@125Anderu@DailycuteNfunny@memethief90@Assamdanny1104@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews Different topic entirely, my point was that if your sexually attracted to a character because they are a child, it is pedophillic. Regardless, you can enjoy media without validating the actions of characters or sexually being attracted to said characters.
@DailycuteNfunny@Assamdanny1104@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews its still pedophilia because the attraction is to the same child like traits, proportions, age markers, that would be present in a real child. drawn or not, the trigger is "this reads as a child" which is literally the definition of the attraction.
@DailycuteNfunny@Assamdanny1104@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews dsm criteria are written for the disorder part, real world distress, because its a clinical manual not a science textbook. researchers who actually study this stuff, use non real images in studies because what matters is which age cues get someone turned on, not if its fictional
@DailycuteNfunny@Assamdanny1104@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews depiction is literally just visual cues for example height, signaling an age. that's the entire basis of character design. if age cues were unreadable you wouldn't be able to distinguish a child character from an adult one, ever, in any art style. you clearly can tho
@DailycuteNfunny@Assamdanny1104@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews If someone is sexually attracted to a fictional character specifically because they're depicted as prepubescent, then the attraction is pedophilia in nature. It doesn't have to be a real child to be pedophilia retard
@Assamdanny1104@DailycuteNfunny@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews You're confusing the disorder with the attraction. Pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children; the disorder is a clinical diagnosis. Fiction doesn't change what the person is attracted to.
@MayoiDesu_@thatconcorddude@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews If you actually looked instead of being a pedophile retard you'd see that I was replying to someone who was critcizing Chibi's sexual attraction to incest of underage kids
@MayoiDesu_@thatconcorddude@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews Who's even talking about loli? Last time I checked the post is criticising Chibi for liking incest between little children? Loli being pedophillia is another topic entirely
@CankleMonitor@thatconcorddude@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews Nobody said fiction is reality. The point is that fiction doesn't make the attraction unrelated to reality. If you're sexually attracted to a character because they're depicted as a child, the fact they're fictional doesn't change that.
@thatconcorddude@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews I could give a single fuck about Jidion, you retard, nor am I defending him or his actions. Jidion existing does not negate Chibi being a pedophile.
@Assamdanny1104@DailycuteNfunny@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews You can’t prey on a fictional character since there’s no victim. But pedophilia describes attraction, not an act. If someone is sexually attracted to characters because they’re depicted as children, calling that attraction pedophilic is reasonable, even if it isn’t abuse.
@CankleMonitor@thatconcorddude@Official_KingVL@ChibiReviews Nobody’s saying fiction and reality have identical consequences. The point is that being fictional doesn’t magically change what the attraction is. You can distinguish the harm without pretending the attraction itself is something different.