@GreyKnight8008@DirtySweetStyle@TurningPointOU Peer reviewed psychological studies are usually replicated. You’re right that there are variances in data, but general trends in observations tend to hold. Larger p-values are usually reported in modern studies.
Point is theological arguments aren’t really relevant in such papers
@ApoloJedi_ Also I just want to add that under quantum physics, nothingness is inherently unstable at >vacuum energy. (Philisophically, no rules on existence quickly devolves into existing states)
@creation247 Don’t get triggered tbh. Just recognize that material reality is the only one that exists. I don’t “scroll past” because I care about people embracing reality.
@StardustBunney Or, perhaps it’s because we live in a society that benefits from cooperation.
If your morals were sound, why don’t you listen to the Bible and stone divorcees?
Because you know it’s wrong by current standards. You have no sense of time or malleability of societal standards.
@creation247 Nope. Quantum physics asserts that nothingness is inherently unstable.
(Side philosophical) nothingness would assume no rules. No rules naturally degrades into something existing.
@flock49600209@kareem_carr Exactly.
Tbh I support rigorous subject material testing so that this BS is debunked. Hard to argue persecution when the question is “According to empirical evidence, which of the following is correct? .. A, B, C, D”
@creation247 Null hypothesis asserts that burden of proof is always on the affirmative.
It’s why we say “prove it” when someone claims there’s a teapot around the moon, or monkeys on Jupiter. It’s why we say innocent until proven guilty.
The null is default until positive is proven.