❌One quarter, different methodologies and no context — that’s not a meaningful comparison. Easy to create an #AlbertaIndependence narrative with selective data. 👇
@ikwilson ❌One quarter, different methodologies and no context — that’s not a meaningful comparison. Easy to create a narrative with selective data. 😉
#AlbertaIndependence
John, John, John, that’s exactly why support for #AlbertaIndependence is declining, there are no arguments and no real plan behind it.
Representation differences in #Canada are intentional they balance population with regional influence, like in most federations.
But #AlbertaIndependence doesn’t fix that. #Alberta wouldn’t suddenly gain influence — it would lose representation in national institutions entirely.
And more importantly: the #AlbertaIndependence argument assumes new partners, trade deals with #Canada and #US, better oil prices and additonal favorable negotiations. ❌None of that is guaranteed — all of it depends on others agreeing.
@DanielMacl1n So now it all depends on negotiations?
The whole #AlbertaIndependence plan basically assumes everyone else will agree. It assumes #Canada, the #US and other partners will all cooperate on Alberta’s terms. There isn’t even a fallback scenario, it only works if everything goes right.
And now you’re shifting to negotiations, so the #AlbertaIndependence plan doesn’t actually work as described?
Also, negotiations don’t override federal law. National parks are Canadian federal land — why would #Canada agree to hand over major tourism assets.
@AngetheBrave72 It’s great your business is doing well — but this says more about your guest mix than about any “narrative.” Tourism is volatile relying heavily on one country is a business risk, not a political argument. ✅
🚩Even more unrealistic if you @TerryHethering9 consider that #Banff, #Jasper and other national parks are federal land — they would remain part of #Canada, not #Alberta.
So #Alberta would actually lose its biggest tourism draw.
Tourism doesn’t “explode” just because a place becomes a country. You need infrastructure, branding, access, stability and years of investment.
#AlbertaIndependence 👇
Calling that “disgusting” while suggesting Canada should become the #51stState is quite the double standard. So booing is unacceptable, but giving up sovereignty is fine!
That’s the same flawed logic you see with the #AlbertaIndependence "movement": it relies on the assumption that the #US would suddenly be a stable and favourable partner — while at the same time expecting #Canada to concede to #Alberta’s demands and future partners to pay more for its oil. 😂
@myabradshaw78 is already failing at basic geography. 🌍
For @myabradshaw78 everything is a conspiracy. 😁
Flying from Ireland to southeast #France, #Geneva is simply the closest major airport and logistical hub. Geneva is the main arrival airport for the #G7 summit — all delegations arrive there.👇
@myabradshaw78 It’s called geography. Flying from Ireland to southeast France, Geneva is simply the closest major airport and logistical hub.
Not everything is a conspiracy. @myabradshaw78
@MrJoKeR604 Well, the whole #Canada#MAGA plan has major gaps and it largely relies on the idea that the #US 🇺🇸 would be a stable and favourable partner — which is a risky assumption at best. 😉
That’s not a strategy, that’s wishful thinking.
@DanielMacl1n You’re making a lot of claims and assumptions. That’s still not a plan. ❌
Saying “nothing is solvable within Canada” isn’t proof, it’s a blanket assumption. If that were true, there wouldn’t be ongoing policy changes, negotiations, and provincial influence at all.
Calling institutions “corrupt” doesn’t solve the problem either replacing them means building a currency, central bank, regulatory system, courts, and international credibility from scratch. That’s not simpler, it’s significantly harder and riskier.
On trade: if CUSMA isn’t renewed for Canada, it doesn’t magically exist for Alberta either. Trade agreements are negotiated by sovereign countries a new Alberta would start from zero, with less leverage, trying to secure access it already has today.
Equalization also isn’t one-dimensional — it ignores federal spending, investment, infrastructure, and guaranteed access to the Canadian market.
#AlbertaIndependence
@Lailapolooza_5D@therealmrbench@saltiflo@Lailapolooza_5D That argument falls apart the second you include actual facts. You’re focusing on one #Trump narrative while ignoring external factors like #US trade actions. That’s not reality, that’s selective outrage.
📍One single poll from one source change the reality. The broader data tells a very different story. For example, Ipsos recently had it at 18%, and Angus Reid shows clear majorities (60-67%) wanting to stay.
#AlbertaIndependence Support has actually dropped in more recent polls. That’s not momentum — that’s a consistent minority position.
But if you prefer to rely on a single poll (40.9% isn’t minority) with unclear methodology, go ahead.