Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος)

Orthodox Catholic Christian ☦ 🇧🇷

[Mikko @blessedmikko]

Another one for the Hall of Fame.

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@theorthobear1 @Zalmoxis7534 Agree. I've never been particularly fond of the term "PSA", but dismissing the obvious juridical aspects of the atonement found throughout Scripture, the Fathers, and the Catechisms is indefensible.

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@GnomeRad @Zalmoxis7534 This is the fruit of Truglia horrendous cope about the juridical aspect of atonement (just to be refuted in a live by his own priest).

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@deadseascrollls @Mattza1 Juliano de Eclano.

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@LatinAcolyte @Tawadros15 They're just jealous, it's funny to see. The papacy feeds them with clown masses and guitar, while hunting down those who wish to maintain the authentic Roman rite.

[Cassian (Kyle) King @barrelagedfaith]

(On Papacy/Primacy Debate) The Orthodox Catholic Church early on was generally unified on basic ecclesiology but there continued to be debates about the nature of primacy and there existed a spectrum of views on it particularly in its limitations. Here is what they held in common.

1. Laity to Deacons to Presbyters to Bishops to God (See St. Ignatius)

2. A bishop is limited to his own see/diocese and cannot interfere in other diocese unless invited ((see Sardica canons 1,2, 3, 4 & accepted by Trullo)

3. A regional council of bishops can judge a bishop in their own region for heresy, corruption, canonical violations.

4. A bishop can appeal to a higher court (Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, Seleucia-Ctesiphon in Persian empire) in exceptional situations (see Sardica canons 1,2, 3, 4 & accepted by Trullo)

Here is what is debated among Catholic & Orthodox:

1. A general council of bishops can discipline/judge the the 'first/protos' bishop among them in extreme situations (see 5th Ecumenical Council); The Post-Schism Western Council of Constance voted in agreement with this principle. (Orthodox say 'yes', Roman Catholics today say 'no.')

2. The first primate/patriarch/pope/bishop CAN interfere any diocese at any time without an appeal. (Orthodox say 'no', Roman Catholics say 'yes') *Conflicts w/ #2 above?

3. The first primate/patriarch/pope/bishop CAN make a binding irreformable dogmatic claim on the entire church outside of an ecumenical council (Orthodox say 'no', Roman Catholics say 'yes') *Conflicts w/ #2 above?

4. The first primate/patriarch/pope/bishop CAN overhaul an entire historic liturgy, overhaul entire canon law, and bind the conscience of all the faithful alone. (Roman Catholics say 'yes' Orthodox say 'no' as liturgy and canon law is the entire inheritance of the church handed on by the fathers).

-A dominant Roman Catholic position states that Christ intended Papal Supremacy through Peter and onto the Bishops of Rome as the Prime Minister (i.e. New Eliakim) of the entire Church. The Pope is the successor of Peter while the bishops are the successors of the apostles and only a kind of Peter (anagogically) but are ultimately subject to the head of the Church who had universal, immediate jurisdiction and a special protection to always bind the whole church to correct doctrine.

-A dominant Orthodox Catholic position states that Christ first gave the sacramental keys of the priesthood to Peter & these passed onto to the apostles and bishops. The principle of Peter's primacy among the apostles is also applied anagogically to archbishops/metropolitans/patriarchs & authorized by the canons. The original primatial sees were the 3 largest cities (or close i.e. Antioch) in the Roman empire and also happened to be in historic successors from St. Peter (Rome, Alexandria, Antioch) and so they were given a wider influence in their respective regions (See Nicaea I). Among these large administrative sees, Rome was considered the first (as the largest city was sanctified by the blood of the two chief apostles, Peter & Paul) and so was the 'first church' among many sister churches and 'first bishop' and among many brother bishops.

*Both Orthodox and Roman Catholics continue to have disputed questions in regards to the nature of primacy among the bishops. Many Roman Catholics would like to see the papacy more limited today. Many Orthodox would like great clarifications in regards to primacy among autocephalous churches and the historic sees. *None of this is from CHATGPT and is only my reflection on the matter after reading loads of Catholic & Orthodox literature on the matter. This summary should also included alot more information =)

[Scholarius @Scholarius1]

The earliest polemical arguments against the Roman papal authority by the Reformed were taken from Nilus Cabasilas.

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@KalebAtlanta @Hleowstede How do you square this with the position of Mark of Ephesus in Florence?

[Fr Justin Slaughter Doty @DotyFr20509]

A Western Rite Orthodox wedding & nuptial High Mass, concelebrated between AWRV clergy and our brother Heiromonk James of Botel Abbey (Scotland): A 🧵

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@MateyYanakiev I think Papyrus was cheaper at that time, but later, especially after Islam and in western Europe, they had to rely more and more on parchments.

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@KlausSonder @avongard2001 "Paróquia de pessoas normais"

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@Yan1984_ @Eschlastic Isso não é recomendado pra ninguém. O discernimento da vocação monástica é muito individual.

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@Yan1984_ @Eschlastic «E assim foram alguns de vós [efeminados, sodomitas, adúlteros, etc.], mas fostes lavados, mas fostes santificados, mas fostes justificados em nome do Senhor Jesus e pelo Espírito do nosso Deus.» (1 Coríntios 6:11)

[Mikko @blessedmikko]

‘St. John of Damascus defines in his theological writings that the Virgin Mary was not without participation in the sin of Adam (δὲν ἦτον ἀμέτοχη ἀπὸ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν τοῦ Ἀδάμ); that is, she was indeed virgin, and pure, and undefiled, yet she too was born from the intercourse of Man.
Christ alone was sinless; He was born also without sin, whereas the Virgin participated in that original sin (ἡ δὲ Παρθένος ἐμέτεχεν ἀπὸ τὴν προπατορικὴν ἁμαρτίαν). Since, therefore, she too had need to be liberated (ἐλευθερωθῇ) from the sin of Adam, for this reason she was evangelised.’
–St. Damascene (Stouditis), Thesaurus, On the Mother of God: Preface

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@cardcajetanus Dá uma olhada no nosso canal:

https://t.co/ykNWwuOnTS

Fala com o @servoBasilio também ele fez uma boa thread sobre primazia/eclesiologia recentemente.

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@El_Casmurro Romanideanismo delenda est.

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@starless_king @TheiosGregorios Submeta-se à "Roma Eterna" que subsiste no mundo das ideias. kkkkkkkk

[Galadhrin @Galadhrin1]

After this, I really dont want to hear SSPX adherents lecture the Orthodox about Papal supremacy or the necessity of communion with Rome. Sort out your own ecclesiological problems first.

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@El_Casmurro Truth Nuke!

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@OrthoFrog_ @HesychiaTheosis The golden overlay added in 1597 followed the same pattern of the icon, it depict The Lord Sabaoth because it is present in the icon itself .

[Lucas Falango (Ἱερώνυμος) @Falango1993]

@OrthoFrog_ @HesychiaTheosis From a russian website:

https://t.co/R1UBGa07Ku