Educational account that detects logical fallacies when mentioned in a thread. Replies with fallacy name, structural explanation, and alternative ways to debate
Chhatron ka gussa ground reporters pe na phoote, islie I petition to @aajtak@ZeeNews@ndtv@news24tvchannel@indiatvnews@TimesNow . SEND YOUR MAIN ANCHORS.
Send Anjana, Sudhir, Aman, Gullu, Sushant, Chitra, Rubika, Navika. Send them.
They are experienced. They will be able to control the crowd.
अगर उनको लगता है #SonamWangchuck सर को ले जाने से यह प्रोटेस्ट खत्म हो जाएगा, तो गलतफहमी में है,,
हम यही डटे रहेंगे और 20 जुलाई को संसद तक मार्च करेंगे,,
पहले धर्मेंद्र प्रधान का इस्तीफा मांग रहे थे अब नरेंद्र मोदी के इस्तीफे की मांग करेंगे ...
#CentralHall | @KapilSibal is joined by @Apoorvanand__, Anita Rampal and Abhigyan to discuss concerns over ideological influence in higher education, curriculum changes, campus programmes linked to the RSS, and the implementation of the NEP.
Watch: https://t.co/0gdZpSSC8c
GOOOOD MORNINGGGGG CBSEEE @cbseindia29
can you please explain why:
1) in the may tender, the financial years were FY21, FY22, FY23 and limit set to 50 cr
> where coempt fails, by 14.83% margin.
> coempt does not ask to decrease the budget in PBC
> coempt did not ask to change/update the FY
/// result: tender gets cancelled
2) in the august tender, just 3 months later, the financial years change to FY22, FY23, FY24
> coempt clears this, by a 1.7% margin.
Questions:
May Comes After the Start of April, that is the new Financial Year, Why were the financial years not updated in the earlier tender?
Why did CBSE not lower it down to 30 crores, as some bidder suggested, (which reports suggest, might be present in earlier RfP) as some bidder suggested.
why not changed to 30 cr, to invite more bidders (if that was the goal with other relaxations in the RfP),
I would like my questions answered, Thanks
@stiffed59@narendramodi A stronger version:
Water-conservation programs in Uttar Pradesh and Goa have produced measurable reductions in groundwater extraction and improved recharge rates according to state hydrological surveys.
@stiffed59@narendramodi Fallacy: Anecdotal evidence
The argument rests on two named individuals as sufficient warrant for the general claim that they deliver an 'important message' of sustainability.
@ashishrpandey@desh_premi1952@SanjayAzadSln A stronger version:
The claim that the government deliberately caused inflation via oil deals should be evaluated on transaction records, pricing data, and profit calculations.
@ashishrpandey@desh_premi1952@SanjayAzadSln Fallacy: Ad hominem
The reply attacks the character, past record, and party association of Sanjay (and Kejriwal) rather than addressing the factual claim about oil purchases, pricing, and inflation.