I think most people approach trading backwards. They assume profitability *requires* some secret strategy (an edge nobody else has discovered yet). So they spend their time hunting for that hidden key and fail miserably. No wonder, though, because this is quant-fund, PhD, millions-in-research hard.
For the average trader, this is a misguided premise. The information that would actually make you profitable is already out there, freely available. You could probably head to Google, type "trend following strategy" or some other keyword, and find something that works today.
So, the real constraint is not access, but rather one of two things:
• You don't like the risk
Running it means sitting through drawdowns, stomaching volatility, etc. The profit is priced in discomfort and it genuinely sucks ass.
• Capturing it takes infrastructure you don't have
The idea is real, you'd happily take it, but the way it actually pays out demands things you can't put on the table. Data feeds, automation, capital, tooling, etc.
So once you strip away the fantasy of the secret strategy, what you're actually left with is quite simple. It always comes back to risk. Either getting comfortable holding risk you were previously unwilling to hold, or learning to take on the specific risk that actually compensates you for carrying it.
As someone who loves trading technicals
I think learning about markets via technicals (like I did) is one of the worst ways to start
It’s a rigid framework where grown men argue with each other about the exact Japanese name for a specific candlestick or a box they’ve drawn on an arbitrary time frame
It doesn’t teach you the foundations - why markets move, different types of participants, microstructure, order types and their impact, perps vs spot, and all that stuff - market ‘plumbing’ as a category
One of the biggest issues with being hyperfocused on technicals is that they don’t teach you principles and market effects
Most technical setups can be decomposed into broad buckets which are well-established (trend, mean reversion, momentum, order flow / price impact, vol clustering etc.)
A lot of technical analysis is an often unknowing attempt to map those broad market effects into a recognisable pattern
But even a technical-first view is better served by understanding the underlying market effect first and then decomposing it, as opposed to focusing on the specific pattern without ever looking at what’s happening under the hood
“This type of triangle tends to go up” is a lot less useful than “this type of flow tends to resolve higher over N time frame”, even if you use the same triangle to identify it
Another example: if you’re drawing a support level and buying it, you’re assuming some version of buyers being more aggressive than sellers in that area over a given time frame and predicting a higher price as a result - but what does that mean?
Shorts closing / taking profit, allowing for mean reversion? Aggressive sellers being absorbed by passive buyers? Some price insensitive buyer predictably stepping in at a value area? Sellers getting margin called and forcibly trading at bad prices/causing a dislocation? Clustering of orders creating some sort of imbalance? And so on.
There’s definitely a risk of overthinking this stuff, and you can make money from charts alone
But if you haven’t thought about the underlying market effects and ‘plumbing’ for your setups you’ll likely be stuck in rigid pattern matching that doesn’t generalise and isn’t subject to deeper investigation and more nuanced application
Even if your main lens remains TA-focused, there is no harm in understanding the stuff you’re trading on a product level (eg perp contract specs, OI, funding, mark/last/index etc) and on a foundational level (why and how markets move)
Especially now that you can jam this stuff into an LLM and keep saying “dumb it down” until you get it, no excuse not to do your homework
This is something I really wish I did much earlier in my trading life, so hopefully it resonates with a fellow trader stuck in TA psychosis spending his mum’s credit card on a fourth Udemy candlestick course
Anyway GM