fast & slow

[fast & slow @fast1slow]

@aakashgupta If the decision-maker is an agent, a layer’s survival reduces to three qestions:
1) Can its function be absorbed by the agent?
2) If so, does the layer still coordinate or standardize between agents?
3) If not, does it control a hard primitive agents cannot rationally bypass?

[fast & slow @fast1slow]

5/ The problem? It ignored everything in between. PTM fixes that by tracking what happens before the final outcome. This means:
🔹 Borrowers who miss payments but catch up are now accounted for.
🔹 Loans that are delinquent but never defaulted aren’t just written off.

[fast & slow @fast1slow]

4/ ✅ PTM (Partial Time Model): Think of a loan as a journey. The old way of predicting outcomes only looked at the final stop:
🔹 Was the loan fully repaid early (prepaid)?
🔹 Did the borrower default (charged off)?

[fast & slow @fast1slow]

4/ Eric Schmidt (@ericschmidt) ex-Google CEO, was shocked by DeepSeek R1’s potential—and @wesroth caught his take early. 👀 This seismic shift in the LLM world didn’t go unnoticed.
https://t.co/9iNaxuGLvZ

[Wes Roth @WesRoth]

Ex-Google CEO (Eric Schmidt) "SHOCKED" by new AI capabilities

00:00 Eric Schmidt is Shocked
00:33 DeepSeek R1
05:19 Eric Schmidt on Chinese Open Source AI Models
06:36 Military AI
10:35 AI Threat vs Nuclear Threat
12:24 AI Influencers
14:34 AI Agents
16:25 Social Simulacra
18:04 Genesis

[fast & slow @fast1slow]

2/ First up: @_philschmid, who called it early. 🚨 Described DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview as ‘mind-blowing’ and noted it matches OpenAI’s O1. Philipp knew the game was changing before most of us. 👀
https://t.co/IWXkpULQUm

[Philipp Schmid @_philschmid]

Mindblowing! 🤯 New reasoning model preview from @deepseek_ai that matches @OpenAI o1! 🐳  DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live to test in deepseek chat designed for long Reasoning! 🧠

> o1-preview-level performance on AIME & MATH benchmarks.
> Access to CoT and transparent thought process in real-time.
> Open-source models & API coming soon!

My test prompt:
Can you crack the code?
9 2 8 5 (One number is correct but in the wrong position)
1 9 3 7 (Two numbers are correct but in the wrong positions)
5 2 0 1 (one number is correct and in the right position) 6 5 0 7 (nothing is correct)
8 5 24 (two numbers are correct but in the wrong

Correct answer is 3841