The defamation campaign against former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh by the RSS-BJP ecosystem was a meticulously planned operation that leveraged multiple instruments: institutions, media, social platforms, and populist movements. Here’s a detailed breakdown of how this propaganda machinery worked:
---
1. The Role of CAG Vinod Rai: Manufacturing the "Scam Narrative"**
- The 2G Spectrum and Coal Block Allocations: The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) under Vinod Rai sensationalized presumptive losses of ₹1.76 lakh crore in the 2G spectrum allocation and ₹1.86 lakh crore in coal block allocation. These figures were speculative and later debunked in courts, where all accused were acquitted.
- Purpose: The exaggerated figures were used to paint Dr. Singh's administration as corrupt, undermining his clean image. Rai’s selective leaks to the media fueled public outrage, creating a perception of massive corruption without substantial proof.
---
2. Anna Hazare Movement(Nautanki): The Trojan Horse of Anti-Corruption
- RSS Infiltration: The "India Against Corruption" (IAC) movement, ostensibly led by Anna Hazare, was backed by RSS cadres who mobilized large-scale protests. The movement provided a façade of neutrality while targeting the UPA government exclusively.
- Media Amplification: Godi media gave disproportionate coverage to the movement, broadcasting 24/7 to create a sense of nationwide anger against the UPA. Figures like Arvind Kejriwal and Kiran Bedi, who later aligned with or indirectly benefited the BJP, spearheaded the anti-UPA campaign.
- Impact: The movement discredited Dr. Singh's government and set the stage for BJP to present itself as a "clean and decisive alternative."
---
3. Godi Media: Weaponizing Public Opinion
- Unbalanced Coverage: Channels like Times Now, Republic (later), and Zee News continuously targeted the UPA government while downplaying or ignoring BJP's scandals in states like Gujarat and Karnataka.
- Villainizing Dr. Singh: Despite his impeccable record, Dr. Singh was ridiculed as "silent" and "weak," while Narendra Modi was marketed as a "strong and decisive leader."
- Narrative Control: Every policy failure or controversy during UPA rule was amplified as a scam, while BJP-ruled states' shortcomings were either ignored or spun positively.
---
4. Social Media Propaganda: Manufacturing Consent
- Troll Armies: BJP’s IT cell exploited platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp to spread misinformation about UPA’s alleged corruption. Fake news, memes, and doctored videos were widely circulated to tarnish the image of Dr. Singh and Congress leaders.
- False Promises: Modi was projected as a messiah who would eradicate corruption, bring back black money, and ensure prosperity for all—a narrative starkly opposed to the actual policies BJP later implemented.
---
5. Hindutva Agenda: From Pragya Thakur to Modi
- Pragya Thakur Model: Initial attempts to impose Hindutva using figures like Pragya Thakur backfired.
- Pivot to Modi: The RSS shifted gears, projecting Modi as a "development icon" while subtly embedding Hindutva narratives. Modi's Gujarat model—a concoction of half-truths—was marketed as a panacea for India’s woes.
- Exploitation of Religion: The BJP exploited religious sentiments, using campaigns like "Ram Mandir" and "Love Jihad" to polarize communities and consolidate the Hindu vote bank.
---
6. Post-Victory Reality: The Adani-Ambani Nexus
- Crony Capitalism: Once in power, BJP implemented policies that blatantly favored corporate giants like Adani and Ambani:
- Adani’s meteoric rise in wealth coincided with BJP’s tenure, with favorable deals in coal, airports, and agriculture.
- Ambani benefited through initiatives like Jio, which received tacit support from the government to dominate the telecom sector.
The defamation campaign against former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh by the RSS-BJP ecosystem was a meticulously planned operation that leveraged multiple instruments: institutions, media, social platforms, and populist movements. Here’s a detailed breakdown of how this propaganda machinery worked:
---
1. The Role of CAG Vinod Rai: Manufacturing the "Scam Narrative"**
- The 2G Spectrum and Coal Block Allocations: The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) under Vinod Rai sensationalized presumptive losses of ₹1.76 lakh crore in the 2G spectrum allocation and ₹1.86 lakh crore in coal block allocation. These figures were speculative and later debunked in courts, where all accused were acquitted.
- Purpose: The exaggerated figures were used to paint Dr. Singh's administration as corrupt, undermining his clean image. Rai’s selective leaks to the media fueled public outrage, creating a perception of massive corruption without substantial proof.
---
2. Anna Hazare Movement(Nautanki): The Trojan Horse of Anti-Corruption
- RSS Infiltration: The "India Against Corruption" (IAC) movement, ostensibly led by Anna Hazare, was backed by RSS cadres who mobilized large-scale protests. The movement provided a façade of neutrality while targeting the UPA government exclusively.
- Media Amplification: Godi media gave disproportionate coverage to the movement, broadcasting 24/7 to create a sense of nationwide anger against the UPA. Figures like Arvind Kejriwal and Kiran Bedi, who later aligned with or indirectly benefited the BJP, spearheaded the anti-UPA campaign.
- Impact: The movement discredited Dr. Singh's government and set the stage for BJP to present itself as a "clean and decisive alternative."
---
3. Godi Media: Weaponizing Public Opinion
- Unbalanced Coverage: Channels like Times Now, Republic (later), and Zee News continuously targeted the UPA government while downplaying or ignoring BJP's scandals in states like Gujarat and Karnataka.
- Villainizing Dr. Singh: Despite his impeccable record, Dr. Singh was ridiculed as "silent" and "weak," while Narendra Modi was marketed as a "strong and decisive leader."
- Narrative Control: Every policy failure or controversy during UPA rule was amplified as a scam, while BJP-ruled states' shortcomings were either ignored or spun positively.
---
4. Social Media Propaganda: Manufacturing Consent
- Troll Armies: BJP’s IT cell exploited platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp to spread misinformation about UPA’s alleged corruption. Fake news, memes, and doctored videos were widely circulated to tarnish the image of Dr. Singh and Congress leaders.
- False Promises: Modi was projected as a messiah who would eradicate corruption, bring back black money, and ensure prosperity for all—a narrative starkly opposed to the actual policies BJP later implemented.
---
5. Hindutva Agenda: From Pragya Thakur to Modi
- Pragya Thakur Model: Initial attempts to impose Hindutva using figures like Pragya Thakur backfired.
- Pivot to Modi: The RSS shifted gears, projecting Modi as a "development icon" while subtly embedding Hindutva narratives. Modi's Gujarat model—a concoction of half-truths—was marketed as a panacea for India’s woes.
- Exploitation of Religion: The BJP exploited religious sentiments, using campaigns like "Ram Mandir" and "Love Jihad" to polarize communities and consolidate the Hindu vote bank.
---
6. Post-Victory Reality: The Adani-Ambani Nexus
- Crony Capitalism: Once in power, BJP implemented policies that blatantly favored corporate giants like Adani and Ambani:
- Adani’s meteoric rise in wealth coincided with BJP’s tenure, with favorable deals in coal, airports, and agriculture.
- Ambani benefited through initiatives like Jio, which received tacit support from the government to dominate the telecom sector.
The defamation campaign against former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh by the RSS-BJP ecosystem was a meticulously planned operation that leveraged multiple instruments: institutions, media, social platforms, and populist movements. Here’s a detailed breakdown of how this propaganda machinery worked:
---
1. The Role of CAG Vinod Rai: Manufacturing the "Scam Narrative"**
- The 2G Spectrum and Coal Block Allocations: The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) under Vinod Rai sensationalized presumptive losses of ₹1.76 lakh crore in the 2G spectrum allocation and ₹1.86 lakh crore in coal block allocation. These figures were speculative and later debunked in courts, where all accused were acquitted.
- Purpose: The exaggerated figures were used to paint Dr. Singh's administration as corrupt, undermining his clean image. Rai’s selective leaks to the media fueled public outrage, creating a perception of massive corruption without substantial proof.
---
2. Anna Hazare Movement(Nautanki): The Trojan Horse of Anti-Corruption
- RSS Infiltration: The "India Against Corruption" (IAC) movement, ostensibly led by Anna Hazare, was backed by RSS cadres who mobilized large-scale protests. The movement provided a façade of neutrality while targeting the UPA government exclusively.
- Media Amplification: Godi media gave disproportionate coverage to the movement, broadcasting 24/7 to create a sense of nationwide anger against the UPA. Figures like Arvind Kejriwal and Kiran Bedi, who later aligned with or indirectly benefited the BJP, spearheaded the anti-UPA campaign.
- Impact: The movement discredited Dr. Singh's government and set the stage for BJP to present itself as a "clean and decisive alternative."
---
3. Godi Media: Weaponizing Public Opinion
- Unbalanced Coverage: Channels like Times Now, Republic (later), and Zee News continuously targeted the UPA government while downplaying or ignoring BJP's scandals in states like Gujarat and Karnataka.
- Villainizing Dr. Singh: Despite his impeccable record, Dr. Singh was ridiculed as "silent" and "weak," while Narendra Modi was marketed as a "strong and decisive leader."
- Narrative Control: Every policy failure or controversy during UPA rule was amplified as a scam, while BJP-ruled states' shortcomings were either ignored or spun positively.
---
4. Social Media Propaganda: Manufacturing Consent
- Troll Armies: BJP’s IT cell exploited platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp to spread misinformation about UPA’s alleged corruption. Fake news, memes, and doctored videos were widely circulated to tarnish the image of Dr. Singh and Congress leaders.
- False Promises: Modi was projected as a messiah who would eradicate corruption, bring back black money, and ensure prosperity for all—a narrative starkly opposed to the actual policies BJP later implemented.
---
5. Hindutva Agenda: From Pragya Thakur to Modi
- Pragya Thakur Model: Initial attempts to impose Hindutva using figures like Pragya Thakur backfired.
- Pivot to Modi: The RSS shifted gears, projecting Modi as a "development icon" while subtly embedding Hindutva narratives. Modi's Gujarat model—a concoction of half-truths—was marketed as a panacea for India’s woes.
- Exploitation of Religion: The BJP exploited religious sentiments, using campaigns like "Ram Mandir" and "Love Jihad" to polarize communities and consolidate the Hindu vote bank.
---
6. Post-Victory Reality: The Adani-Ambani Nexus
- Crony Capitalism: Once in power, BJP implemented policies that blatantly favored corporate giants like Adani and Ambani:
- Adani’s meteoric rise in wealth coincided with BJP’s tenure, with favorable deals in coal, airports, and agriculture.
- Ambani benefited through initiatives like Jio, which received tacit support from the government to dominate the telecom sector.
Alexa, can you tell me who Dr Manmohan Singh was in just 250 words?
🪯 A prime minister who didn't have to market his family's poverty
🪯 who had real college degrees from Oxford and Cambridge
🪯 who had a valid US visa before he "accidentally" became @PMOIndia
🪯 who didn't have a home minister or NSA who were named in murder plots
🪯 who epitomised decency and didn't taunt women like a cheap rowdy
🪯 who attended Parliament, and treated Opposition as rivals, not enemies
🪯 who didn't need to brag about working 18-hour days
🪯 who didn't need a teleprompter to demonstratoe his "oratory"
🪯 whose opinion world leaders sought during the 2008 global financial crisis
🪯 whose leadership saw India's GDP grow by 144% GDP over 10 years
🪯 who lifted 250 million out of poverty, and grew per capita GDP by 121%
🪯 who delivered stock market returns of 20.78% and 11.61% in his two terms
🪯 who increased the real income of farm cultivators by 7.5%
🪯 who made food, education employment, info a right of the people
🪯 who didn't make stupid decisions that ruined the lives and livelihood of people
🪯 who didn't function as the commission agent of any corporate
🪯 who didn't need to pose with film stars or watch movies with colleagues
🪯 who didn't need to follow hate-mongers on social media
And, above all, a minority Sikh
🪯 who kept the majoritarian monkeys on leash instead of allowing them to dig under mosques, dance before churches
And a true visionary who saw the future👇🏾
Dear Dr. Mahmohan Singh Sir,
-This post is to Say a Sorry for the Mistakes which We Indians have done in 2014.
-We Made a Meme, Defamed You through our Posts because We were Blinded by the News Channel which Showed You as the Most Corrupt and Weakest PM.
-Despite Insulting, You did not Arrest any of us nor did You Raised Your Voice Against the Common People of India.
-We Became so Blinded by the Fake Narratives of News Channels and the Fake Revolution of Anna Hazare that We Completely Forgot that You Were the Reason for :-
➡️ Saving India from 1991 Economic Crisis by Establishing Liberalization, Privatization, and Globalization.
➡️ Special Economic Zone (SEZ) 2005, Which Enacted IT Companies Growth 📈.
➡️ The Right to Information Act of 2005, Which Promoted Transparency in Government Institutions.
➡️ Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) 2005, Which Provided Livelihood, Sustenance and Employment to Poors.
➡️ Signing of the Indo-US Nuclear Agreement 2008 which made India as one of the Strongest Nuclear Country.
➡️ You Ended the Polio-Pandemic of India in 2012.
➡��� India Clocked it's Highest GDP Growth at 10.08% in 2006-2007.
➡️ Again Saved India from Infamous 2008 World Economic Deflation.
➡️Right to education Act 2009 Which Aims Towards Providing Free and Compulsory Elementary Education to All.
➡️ You Lifted 27 Crore Indians Out of Poverty.
➡️ Taken India to World's 3rd Largest Economy.
-This is Just a few numbers of Achievement You have done for Us Indians.
-In Return We Voted You out and Voted to Most Corrupt Party twice.
-And Now We Realised that Our India is Suffering from Major Communal and Economical Crisis. Our Media has been Sold out, the Pillars of Our Democracy have become Unstable. There are no Rights left for us Common People.
Although We are flawed human being, this does not excuse the mistakes We have done with You Sir !! Only It can be done by Voting Out this Government !!
- Sorry Once Again Respected Sir !!!
Modi's Betrayal of the Armed Forces:
The BJP-led government under Narendra Modi has made several decisions that undermine the welfare and strength of India’s Armed Forces. These actions range from questionable military procurement deals to cuts in budgets and benefits for the armed forces personnel. Below is a detailed look at how these decisions have led to the betrayal of our military, a force that has long served the nation with dedication and sacrifice.
1. Rafale Purchase at an Exorbitant Price: One of the most controversial decisions made under Modi’s leadership was the purchase of the Rafale fighter jets. Despite the much-publicized claims of an agreement for a "better deal," the actual price paid was significantly higher than what was initially projected, and the deal was marred by corruption allegations in France. Instead of prioritizing transparency, the government was embroiled in scandals that tarnished the integrity of the defense procurement process.
2. Reduced Military Budget: While the government claims to prioritize national security, the reality tells a different story. The military budget has seen a significant reduction during Modi's tenure. This move not only affects the procurement of modern equipment but also impacts the overall operational capabilities of the armed forces. The cut in the military budget has forced the forces to manage with outdated equipment and insufficient resources, weakening India’s defense preparedness.
3. Reduction in Benefits: Modi’s government has also implemented cuts in benefits that directly affect the welfare of the armed forces personnel. The reduction in the availability of benefits such as those provided by the Canteen Stores Department (CSD) is a prime example. This, along with other perks, is a betrayal of the commitment made to military personnel, whose sacrifices are now being undervalued.
4. Cuts in Pensions: The government has significantly reduced the pensions for retired military personnel. This move, which directly affects veterans and their families, shows a lack of respect for their years of service. Reducing pensions is not only an economic setback for the individuals who served the nation but also a moral one, as it undermines the dignity of the people who laid down their lives for the country.
5. Reduction in Allowances and Dearness Allowance (DA): The armed forces personnel, who often work in difficult and perilous conditions, have also seen a reduction in their allowances and Dearness Allowance (DA). These cuts have directly impacted their standard of living, further showing the government's disregard for the welfare of the forces. When the country’s defense personnel are made to suffer financially, it speaks volumes about the government’s priorities.
6. The Agniveer Scheme: The Agniveer scheme, presented as a cost-cutting measure, has further reduced benefits for recruits while decreasing the overall number of permanent military personnel. This move has drawn widespread criticism for its focus on reducing recruitment costs at the expense of military strength and stability. The introduction of Agniveers also means that the military now has a shorter-term, less experienced force that may not be as capable of handling long-term security challenges.
7. No Recruitment During COVID-19: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the government failed to recruit new personnel into the armed forces. While many sectors were impacted by the pandemic, the complete halt in military recruitment during such a critical time, coupled with ongoing retirements, has led to a significant reduction in the overall strength of the military. The inability to replace retiring personnel has created a gap in the force, making the military more vulnerable.
1/2
The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has been criticized for its historical stance on India's freedom struggle and its ideological divergence from key freedom fighters. Below is an overview of how the RSS is viewed in relation to these figures and their movements:
---
1. Chandra Shekhar Azad
Opposition to RSS: Chandra Shekhar Azad, a revolutionary leader, was committed to socialist ideals and violent resistance against British rule, which contrasted sharply with the RSS's initial apolitical and Hindu nationalist approach. Azad was part of the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association (HSRA), emphasizing a classless society—an idea not promoted by the RSS at the time.
RSS Role: The RSS did not directly support revolutionary activities, which they viewed as counterproductive to their vision of cultural nationalism. Their focus during this period was building a Hindu society rather than participating in violent resistance.
---
2. Bhagat Singh
Opposition to RSS: Bhagat Singh was an atheist and a Marxist, advocating for a secular, socialist India. In contrast, the RSS has historically promoted a Hindu-centric narrative, which Bhagat Singh criticized as divisive.
In his writings, Bhagat Singh denounced communalism, arguing for class unity across religious lines, which stands in ideological opposition to the RSS's Hindu nationalism.
RSS's Absence: The RSS did not engage in or support revolutionary movements like the HSRA and refrained from direct involvement in anti-colonial struggles.
---
3. Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose
Opposition to RSS: Bose was a staunch advocate of secularism and inclusivity, envisioning a united India beyond religious lines. He founded the Indian National Army (INA) and sought the support of Japan and Germany to fight British rule.
The RSS did not participate in Bose's revolutionary activities. Golwalkar, an early RSS leader, avoided condemning British imperialism and focused instead on cultural nationalism. Bose's emphasis on armed resistance and secular governance conflicted with the RSS's Hindu nationalist goals.
Bose’s Criticism of Communalism: Bose consistently opposed organizations that propagated communal politics, which included the RSS.
---
4. Jawaharlal Nehru
Opposition to RSS: Nehru was a vocal critic of the RSS, accusing it of promoting communal divisions. He held the organization responsible for contributing to the environment that led to Mahatma Gandhi's assassination.
Post-independence, Nehru’s government banned the RSS in 1948 following Gandhi’s murder, citing its role in fostering hate.
Nehru’s secular vision of India was in direct contrast to the RSS’s idea of a Hindu Rashtra.
---
5. Mahatma Gandhi
Opposition to RSS: Gandhi's philosophy of nonviolence, religious harmony, and secularism sharply differed from the RSS's ideology.
Gandhi opposed communalism and worked tirelessly to bridge Hindu-Muslim unity, whereas the RSS focused on Hindu consolidation.
Gandhi on the RSS: While Gandhi acknowledged the discipline of RSS volunteers, he criticized their exclusionary stance. Gandhi’s assassination by Nathuram Godse, who was linked to RSS ideology, deepened opposition to the organization.
---
Historical Context of RSS and the Freedom Struggle
The RSS, founded in 1925, stayed largely aloof from the freedom struggle, focusing on cultural nationalism and Hindu unity. It did not actively participate in mass movements like the Non-Cooperation Movement, Civil Disobedience Movement, or Quit India Movement.
B.R. Ambedkar and other leaders criticized the RSS for its lack of contribution to the independence movement.
The ideological and practical divergences between the RSS and key freedom fighters highlight significant opposition. While these leaders pursued secularism, socialism, and inclusivity, the RSS's focus was on building a Hindu-centric cultural identity, often at odds with their visions for India.
Economic and Governance Trajectory – Comparing UPA vs. NDA Eras
The narrative surrounding India’s economic performance under Dr. Manmohan Singh (MMS) and Prime Minister Narendra Modi (2014–present) requires a closer examination. While the UPA government faced challenges like being part of the "Fragile Five" due to external pressures, the economic and governance indicators under the Modi regime reveal a worrying trend, including rising debt, reduced growth, policy opacity, and questionable economic decisions.
Economic Indicators Under Modi's Tenure
1. Debt Explosion
- India’s national debt has increased manifold since 2014, with the total debt-to-GDP ratio rising sharply. This reflects an over-reliance on borrowing without corresponding investments in growth-oriented infrastructure or productivity enhancements.
- Unlike the UPA era, when deficits were largely driven by external factors like global oil prices, the ballooning debt now is driven by internal policy mismanagement.
2. Declining Growth Rates
- Post-2016, GDP growth has steadily declined, even before COVID-19 disruptions. Growth rates under Modi have consistently been lower compared to the UPA’s average of 7-8%, with a noticeable slowdown in private investment and industrial output.
3. Currency Printing During Demonetisation
- The demonetisation exercise of 2016 resulted in 90% more currency being printed to replace old notes, an exercise that disrupted the informal economy, caused job losses, and failed to achieve stated goals like curbing black money or counterfeit currency.
4. Asset Transfers to Select Corporates
- Critical national assets, including airports, ports, and natural resources, have been systematically handed over to a select group of Gujarati corporates, raising concerns about crony capitalism. This not only concentrates wealth but also stifles competition and innovation in key sectors.
5. FDI and Business Climate
- Despite tall claims, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows have stagnated, with many global MNCs either downsizing or shutting operations in India, citing regulatory uncertainty and lack of ease in doing business.
---
Governance Challenges and Lack of Transparency
1. PM CARES Fund
- The opacity surrounding the PM CARES Fund, which has been exempted from RTI scrutiny, undermines public trust. Despite being a public fund, its operations and audits remain hidden, raising questions about accountability.
2. Dilution of RTI
- The Modi government has systematically weakened the RTI Act, a hallmark of the UPA era, reducing its effectiveness as a tool for citizens to hold the government accountable.
3. Press Freedom and Accountability
- Unlike Dr. Manmohan Singh, who regularly engaged with the media to keep the nation informed, Modi has avoided press conferences entirely, further consolidating power and limiting democratic discourse.
---
While Dr. Manmohan Singh’s government faced global economic challenges during its tenure, its policies fostered transparency, inclusive growth, and economic reforms that strengthened India’s fundamentals. In contrast, under Modi, key economic and governance indicators point to increased centralization, policy opacity, and a focus on benefitting select corporate groups. India’s current trajectory demands urgent course correction to ensure sustainable growth and uphold democratic accountability.
Something very strange has happened. 🧵
We did a story on #Mumbai#Dharavi & the #Adani redevelopment project. It’s a ground report.
My team told me not to use the Adani name or image on video thumbnail, fearing the video reach would get affected but I ignored. 1/3
Sikhs and Sikhism are being unfairly targeted by RSS-BJP propaganda. It’s deeply concerning to see attempts to tarnish the reputation of an entire community by labeling them as Khalistani, based on isolated incidents blown out of proportion by godi media especially by @aajtak@TimesNow@ABPNews@ZeeNews
The narrative of Khalistan is being deliberately amplified to create division, much like how Muslims are linked to Pakistan and Mughals by the same forces. However, targeting Sikhs will not be as easy. Sikhs have always stood for unity, justice, and the defense of the nation, and these attempts to vilify them will not succeed.
The push for a Hindu Rashtra agenda has already sown seeds of division, threatening communal harmony and the fabric of our nation. This political game might temporarily empower Hindutva forces, but it comes at the irreversible cost of India's unity and diversity.
No true patriot can stand by and support such a dangerous agenda. It’s time to reject these divisive politics and work towards a future where all communities thrive together.
https://t.co/lm5byqF8aa
@Cyberdost They go on changing methodology
They know a lot about number they call viz. Family members to businesses.
They also fake as reputed courier company like FedEx employee to tell export shipment to nation we have never exported to have been held at customs to get Adhar details.
@RajputRanjanaa@jatinbhutani92 What’s population of Hindus?
Will Jains be able to grow to make Hindus a minority?
Muslims never will be majority ever then how is this possible?
Hindus are not in danger logic is.
https://t.co/IemHVgJJ5G
Happy Teacher's Day from WizeKart! 🎉 Today, we celebrate the incredible mentors who inspire, guide, and shape our future. Thank you, teachers, for your dedication and wisdom! 🌟 #TeachersDay#ThankYouTeachers#WizeKart
🌺🙏 Celebrating Janmashtami! 🙏🌺
On this auspicious day, we commemorate the birth of Lord Krishna, who taught us the timeless values of love, compassion, and righteousness. May His divine blessings fill our lives with joy, peace, and prosperity.
✨
#Janmashtami#LordKrishna
Kenyan runner Abel Mutai was just a few feet from the finish line, but became confused with the signage and stopped, thinking he had completed the race.
A Spanish runner, Ivan Fernandez, was right behind him and, realizing what was happening, started shouting at the Kenyan to continue running. Mutai didn't know Spanish and didn't understand. Realizing what was taking place, Fernandez pushed Mutai to victory.
A journalist asked Ivan, "Why did you do that?"
Ivan replied, "My dream is that someday we can have a kind of community life where we push and help each other to win."
The journalist insisted, "But why did you let the Kenyan win?"
Ivan replied, "I didn't let him win, he was going to win. The race was his."
The journalist insisted again, "But you could have won!"
Ivan looked at him and replied, "But what would be the merit of my victory? What would be the honor in that medal? What would my mother think of that?"
Your comments on this