The major fault with the argument that the current conflict parallels Gallipoli is that in 1914-1915, Britain was the consumer of the commodity flowing through the checkpoint. This was an existential vulnerability.
But the US is the world's largest oil producer and a net exporter. Britain in 1914 is more analogous to Japan/South Korea/India and China... dependent nations with short term inventory.
In short: the commodity dependency risk simply does not exist for the US in regards to oil. The US attack on Hormuz is motivated by geopolitical control, not existential oil risk. The US can survive a closed Hormuz far more easily than Britain could a century ago.
The second failure point is that Epic Fury is currently in a ceasefire. It is not a military failure by any definition of the word. The US is simply dominant, end of story. Galipolu was about a military operation that failed, this is not that.
There are numerous other reasons why its an imperfect analogy but not sure anyone is reading so I'll cut it off here.
@bridgemindai@bridgebench Every Chinese model I've used has sucked balls in comparison to the glowing reports always planted about them. So... no thanks.
What's wrong with limiting access to such a good (and potentially dangerous) technology to US citizens? While I don't have access to Mythos, I've seen enough to know with high confidence that it excels at finding subtle interactions in complex code that lead to undesired side effects.
Fable is really good but too expensive and burns through credits too fast, even on an enterprise plan. Non-starter, back to Opus. @AnthropicAI you need to fix this.
@Mlke_Mik@daniel_mac8 I've been hitting it hard and it's coding circles around Opus. It also discovered some novel improvements in my trading systems which were immediately profitable.
@MaxTheoKi@MilesCranmer I don't think he's saying that at all. I think the paper explicitly says he's not saying that (IIRC it's not in front of me). He's implying that the substrate matters though.