$MU nationalization and price regulation incoming?
*TRADE GROUPS URGE US TO BOOST MEMORY CHIP SUPPLY STRAINED BY AI
*NINE INDUSTRY GROUPS PRESS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ON MEMORY CHIPS
*TRADE GROUPS SEND LETTER TO BESSENT, LUTNICK ON MEMORY SHORTAGE
Look at that Hyperliquid price action. If there wasn't the bad luck of Bitcoin happening to be dragged to hell at the same time as the Hyperliquid attempted breakout Hyperliquid would be triple digits already for sure...
@Franny8 Also thinking about it. $SPCX demand is kind of secular and not tied to consumers. $TSLA is a consumer product (even robots). Kind of like the AI trade at large...
@RomanSPQR Not in my buy and hold index! ($VT via $WLDU.)
It's highly likely to mechanically go up first, before it then becomes an unattractive long term holding.
Bought a lot of $XOVR calls. Low IV way to bet on SpaceX having a successful IPO. And the rest of the holdings I would expect to have more upside than downside too.
Turduckens getting killed today.
Bought $SATS calls again.
And on $DXYZ there's an interesting opportunity to sell puts where it has to go lower than NAV to lose money...
Deploying AI in enterprise is a mess right now.
We watched one company spend 8 months going in circles:
Month 1: Copilot (bundled in, seemed free)
Month 2: Rolled out ChatGPT to 20% of staff because Copilot underperformed
Month 3: Both tools sitting at ~20% adoption. Reassessing costs.
Month 4: Decided to go all-in on ChatGPT
Month 4-5: A rogue Claude user group quietly formed
Month 6: IT launched a formal Claude assessment
Month 7: Decided to switch the whole rollout to Claude
Month 8: ChatGPT Codex dropped. IT is now running another cost review...
This landscape will continue to change.
Enterprise AI adoption is not a procurement problem. It is a change management problem... And most companies are solving the wrong one.