@gameyaaad Is this not simply reflecting a cluttered timetable. Players simply do not have enough time with franchise cricket and extra tours to rack up the time in all formats to make the "top 10".
@MaysaDiye If negative numbers are not allowed you can make 1 by creating 9 to the power of zero (put the bottom part of the four across the top to make the zero)
@OllieAFCB What are we doing is defining something statistically hard. They are co-dependent. For someone to come in on election and leave, his predecessor needs to leave on one, and next guy start on one, so you have 2 pts/2 people and any failure breaks. If it flips, you may get a streak
@Ken_Stonger@DanNeidle@ToryFibs@BBCPolitics try googling the GLA and see how many times the word "political" comes up. I suspect there is reasonable grounds to call it factual and not opinion.
@geoffbanksbet May I suggest a sizeable number of people ask directly for comment at :
https://t.co/yIzNoyRcCu
It does show both a huge lack of respect for the industry at the department level, and also zero self-awareness at the personal level.
@brucemillington I love to slate bookmakers, but for once this is a punter issue. A race with 20 runners at 16/1 each (without any more information) is very well defined. Takes a lot of work to start discounting all the other runners, and introducing a new finishing line, to make it unclear??
@TheNotoriousSKi@nickwhite1995 Suspect the reason they void whole market is cos those who take out the wrong price, also close it out when normality returns. If they just voided the "odd" bit and left them with the cover that would be very harsh on them, so they have no option really. Void has to be immediate.
@slbsn Its interesting that no one has mentioned Boro "double dipping" - have nothing against the club, but from an academic perspective they had a chance to progress on the field, and a second go off it. Much like having a shot on goal, and only when it didnt go in, getting a penalty.
@MercuriusFilius All horses run in heats, then run winners to get heat order A-E by speed of winners. A1 is clearly fastest so rest him. Then race A2,A3,B1,B2,C1 who are the only remaining who could be "top 3".
@kieransopinion@DanNeidle@mccleangreen not if the authority are unaware. They cannot seek something they dont know exists. There certainly wont be a huge budget for council wide forensic inspection. The onus must therefore be for people to (reasonably) register something so fundamental.
@DanNeidle@XplodingCabbage more interestingly where did the 3m come from on a company that size. Probably unlikely to get much security based on the sale price, so would have to introduce his own money into the company. My guess would be it was actually 30k and its another tax scam
@that_stocks_guy@currys Would not be at all surprised if they train their staff this way. I had the full lecture about "the law" requiring me to speak to the manufacturer. Seemed way too structured to be a personal opinion of counter staff or something rogue. Was clearly company policy to lie.
@nishikoripicks is flat stakes the same stake for all bets, or the same total value (bet+win) for all bets? given the implied curve seems that you could fix it simply by modifying stakes (ie you are betting too much at higher prices - which would be the case for the same stake all prices)
@Golfpunter1 Ive seen a bar-code corrupt before. Ticket reads as a completely different one. Its possible another punter scanned the barcode, got a happy surprise when he saw the "wrong" outcome, cashed it and kept schtum.
@betangel not sure it counts as abuse if you choose to stop betting for a period to manage your P/L. Guys who get hit hardest are ante-post traders who bet all year but settle the lot in a couple of weeks at season-end. Their thresholds could even be 52 years !
@CaanBerryTrader@chrisgambler247@Golfpunter1 Heres a (very late) thought. This EF is really bad for ante-post traders. Since they only use 52 active weeks, if you trade all year but settle all at the end, this is only 1 "active week" and all the thresholds are over decades not 1 year.