Did you know neural networks have a frequency bias when they learn? Namely, they learn low frequencies before high ones.
We explain this phenomenon and offer tools to eliminate/control it.
➡️ Learn more: https://t.co/Cz9AVM5mf8 🔥
Thread 🧵 (1/7)
@fcosahli@MirceaSci
@ohowell123@ParisPerdikaris@SimPezzu yes, we only do the eigenfunction computation once and it's pretty fast compared to the training time. We have a Figure in the paper regarding this. The mesh discretization influences the results, but it's not too critical for the low freq. eigenfunctions.
new #preprint:
Δ-PINNs: physics-informed neural networks on complex geometries
We encode the domain using the Laplacian eigenfuctions, then we solve forward and inverse problems on any geometry, like geodesics on a bunny!👇
https://t.co/GQAcX2i7si
@ParisPerdikaris@SimPezzu
New #preprint:
Probabilistic learning of the Purkinje network from the electrocardiogram
We identify potential representations of ❤️the cardiac conduction system❤️that explain patient's electrocardiogram with and without pathologies.
https://t.co/Jk2MqdsCqL
@SimPezzu
🚨New #preprint 🚨
https://t.co/26fzsywAxk
'Generative hyperelasticity with physics-informed diffusion fields'!
with @fcosahli@tajtac @ProfRausch @BilionisIlias
We use diffusion for uncertainty quantification in material models.
A 🧵👇
New #Preprint “Unsupervised reconstruction of cardiac cine MRI using Neural Fields”
We reconstruct dynamic images of the ❤️ with fully connected neural networks using only a fraction of the data, reducing acquisition times ⏳
https://t.co/4J1rR4PRai
#neuralfields#MRI
New preprint work from the lab by @tajtac in collaboration with @fcosahli and @ProfRausch: Data-driven anisotropic finite viscoelasticity using neural ODEs https://t.co/PH1e8ap8bO #MachineLearning#DataScience
new #preprint!
WarpPINN: Cine-MR image registration with physics-informed neural networks
We learn the deformation of the♥️using a continuous space-time NN, informed by the mechanics of cardiac tissue.
https://t.co/CrkL144zpq
@ArratiaLo1 @DanielEHurtado1@hernan_mella
@keenanisalive@unsorsodicorda@ParisPerdikaris@SimPezzu@NVIDIAAI yes! I have your method implemented and I use it quite a bit.
In this paper we attempt to learn the location of the b.c. from observed distances.
In my experience, the heat method does not satisfy the Eikonal equation as well as the exact geodesics, which may be an issue here.
@unsorsodicorda@ParisPerdikaris@SimPezzu@keenanisalive@NVIDIAAI this is problematic because the operators of the pde are not defined on the surface when you use automatic differentiation in standard PINNs.
5) thanks! I think there are a lot of new things to discover in this area.
@unsorsodicorda@ParisPerdikaris@SimPezzu@keenanisalive@NVIDIAAI 4) thanks for the reference, and the main difference is that we work on surfaces rather than volumes, so you can see it more as a re-parametrization of the domain rather imposing b.c.s. The main issue that we tackle is that the input of the nn is (x,y,z) but the surface is 2D.
Yesterday, @fcosahli opened the Fall '22 season of the Closer Look 🧐 journal club. Its a beautiful talk on his recent paper (👉https://t.co/NH8cZqet0H), which also includes a neat review on Gaussian Processes! If you missed it, watch it here:
https://t.co/0FO5yI1Jkx
Welcome back to school 🎒🏫! We are back with more journal club, join us tomorrow Wednesday 24th at 11:30am ET to learn from @fcosahli about 🫀🩺📈. More info about our Fall lineup: https://t.co/njOWDQnSeM