Fed Up, and Back...

My politics dont define me, I only trust my immediate family and my dog.

Pronouns: ...are for losers

[Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio @LeoKearse]

The classroom social media ban is to stop children sharing images of the adult refugees who've been placed in their classrooms.

[Eamonn Butler @eamonnbutler]

Only a matter of time now.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

Former TMZ Insider who worked at TMZ and has nearly a decade in New York News experience is speaking out

She says the mail in ballots in Los Angeles are very clearly fraud but TMZ won’t cover it because of the ‘TMZ News Directors’

She explains that if Leftist news directors don’t support a story, it won’t get covered

“Let me tell you, one thing I've learned is that if a news director does not support what is going on or what needs to be reported for the truth, they're not going to investigate it. They're not going to. It will not be on their network, period”

This TMZ insider is telling us to our faces that both news and major shows will not cover stories if the director doesn’t support the story politically

So that got me thinking, which shows and news have “left leaning” directors that would ignore stories like voter fraud? Here’s the list

• TMZ
• People Magazine
• Us Weekly
• E! News
• Access Hollywood
• Entertainment Tonight
• The View
• Extra
• BuzzFeed Entertainment
• HuffPost Entertainment
• Daily Mail US
• Page Six
• Vibe Magazine
• Rolling Stone
• The Hollywood Reporter
• Variety
• IndieWire
• Deadline Hollywood
• CNN
• MSNBC
• ABC News
• CBS News
• NBC News
• PBS
• NPR
• BBC News

This needs attention. We can’t survive as a country with this much coordinated misinformation

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@EmmanuelMacron Oh fuck off

[Count Dankula @CountDankulaTV]

This all seems to be a ploy to link IP addresses and online activity directly to an identifiable person to make them easier to catch and track down. The government falsely assumed that everyone watches porn and they thought they would get everyone that way. It obviously did not work as well as they were hoping so they are now expanding it. (I have always said that initial laws are just a foot in the door, those laws will always be expanding after the fact into their true original intended purpose).

So their plan now is if you want to use any social media or much of the internet in any way, you will need to prove that you are over 18 which means submitting an ID. This will require far far more ID submissions which will massively expand the government database, which was the real plan all along, not the safety of children.

The funniest thing about this is after all the fuss about the Online Safety Act, this blanket ban on kids using social media pretty much renders the entire act pointless and made it a giant waste of time. Which to be honest, proves that the act was never about protecting children but was really about building a giant database that links all online activity directly to a person.

This database would then be constantly poured over by AI to flag "citizens of concern" to the government who may be potential political dissidents, saying naughty anti-government things etc so the government can pre-emptively act against them.

Minority Report. This is literally the plot of Minority Report.

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@Conservatives Piss off, uniparty scum!

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@BBCBreaking Yeah, sure they were, like the Trump - Russia hoax I guess?!?

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@Nigel_Farage Uniparty

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@Polymarket Funny that....

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@KemiBadenoch @LauraTrottMP This is why you'll lose future elections, no fucking sense.

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@AndrewHWestern Shut it, Chubby.

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@RobertaFresque2 "Ask"

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@10DowningStreet https://t.co/Xwdagynvg7

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@BigPaulieDoyle State of this....

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

The Epstein Class at it's finest: if you don't agree with this 'under 16s ban' then you're defending pedophiles and groomers online.

Coming from a literal pedophile protector... Mandelson and Saville come to mind.

Look at this little rat scumbag - he can't even hide his glee. The face, the laugh, the inner demon is on full display for everyone to see. He is absolutely loving every single second of selling you out.

This has absolutely nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with total, calculated control. The 'save the kids' narrative was always the bait; the real prize is absolute surveillance and the total destruction of an adult's right to a privat life.

Worse than that; the sheep have signed us up for a real time, real world panopticon. It is not just online anymore - it is the physical rollout of automated 'social credit scores,' mandatory digital IDs, total biometric surveillance, and state-enforced behaviour management. They have handed this regime the keys to track your wallet, your movement, and your mind, ushering in a brutal era of dystopian control where stepping out of line means being deleted from society with a single keystroke.

First step: they are stripping away online anonymity so they can harvest, track, and log every single move you make. Why else do you think they are aggressively building massive data centres across the country? It's not to host gaming servers - it's the storage infrastructure for a 24/7 wireless digital dragnet.

It never has been, and never will be, about the children.

While you are forced to submit facial biometrics and digital IDs just to open an app, MPs, Lords, civil servants and government allies will inevitably be exempt from having their phones screened and monitored. Rules for thee, but never for them.

Well done, Britain. You had a golden opportunity to see through the 'save the children' lie and stop this dystopian lockdown in its tracks. Instead, you were far too busy falling for fake 'movements' designed to distract and divide, and sleepwalking straight into a digital cage.

You stripped us ALL of our privacy, anonymity and freedoms and now you have exactly the totalitarian state you deserve. Enjoy the surveillance.

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@MumsnetTowers Liberals promoting Bluesky and what happens on that platform....why am I not surprised?!?

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

Apple built this exact tool in 2021. Within weeks, security researchers showed it could flag innocent people's content. Apple killed it 16 months later. The UK just gave tech companies three months to build it anyway, threatening prison for executives who refuse.

The proposal is for something called client-side scanning. End-to-end encryption (the technology that protects your WhatsApp or Signal messages) works by scrambling your messages on your phone before they leave it. Nobody intercepting them can read them. Client-side scanning changes that sequence: your phone checks every image and message against a database of prohibited content before encrypting it. The lock stays in place, but the inspection happens first. When the government says "scan for nude images," technically they mean "scan everything."

The people who invented internet security have already ruled on this. Ronald Rivest helped create RSA encryption, the system behind every padlock icon you see in a browser. Whitfield Diffie invented public-key cryptography, the math that all web security is built on. In October 2021, both co-signed a paper with twelve other leading cryptographers, concluding that device-level scanning undermines security for everyone while giving law enforcement only unreliable gains. Once that infrastructure is on every phone, any government can point it at whatever they decide to ban next.

The EU spent three years trying to pass something identical. Germany blocked a Council vote in October 2025. On March 26, 2026, the European Parliament voted 307 to 306 to reject it. One vote. German federal police data from those debates showed roughly 48% of the 300,000 chats reported annually under existing scanning rules were false positives, innocent people's messages treated as criminal evidence.

There is one more consequence the announcement left out. The government wants to block nude images on children's devices but not adults'. Enforcing that line means every device in the UK needs to know whether its owner is a child. The only way to do that is mandatory age verification. Signal pointed out where this lands: every UK resident would need to prove their identity just to communicate privately. That means 67 million people submitting identification to use software they already own.

The EU rejected this by one vote two and a half months ago. The UK is now attempting it alone.

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

I've just heard 3 people who were reporting on riots in Northern Ireland using their YouTube accounts have been arrested.

They were not involved in any rioting, they are not involved in any criminal activity.

They are looking to do anther Southport to clamp down on free speech.

#TwoTierKeir

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

@BearJFK Its just the left, being the left.

[Fed Up, and Back... @FedUpandBack]

LOL!!!

[TONY™ @TONYxTWO]

OMG 😭

“AND LASTLY, MICHELLE OBAMA IS A MAN! AM I RIGHT AMERICA?!”

😭😭😭😂😂😂