Felipe Nunes

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@stats_feed

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

Fux: Ai a minha esposa entrou no banheiro e eu tava cantarolando Alexandre de Moraes no tema do osmarzinho
é Alexandre de Moraes! tan tan tan tan tan

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@leiatheinvestor Não. Daniel é apelido do José Dirceu

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@Mozartinhu @olabocos Sote e Scelesio
Alix 2

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@republiqueBRA Lembro das mensagens da Letícia Sallorenzo falando sobre uma tal "PF confiável"

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@josiasteofilo Era só o que me faltava!
Além de pagar pelo show dela, eu tenho que assistir também?

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@ivanildoiii 🧑🏻‍🦲

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@CentralDireitaB @JornalOGlobo Já podemos substituir esse meme

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@sensoinc #ninguemsoltaamaodeninguem

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@JoaquinTeixeira Eu tenho certeza que essas campanhas com dancinhas boiola foram ideia do Renan.
Ele ta curtindo d+ pra alguém que foi convencido de que isso era uma boa idéia

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@ophello @TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer Credible evidence more than just credible witnesses. Witnesses are important, but based on them alone, I could speculate about gov psyops, time travelers, demonic mind control, and so on. Any hypothesis requires verifiable evidence; otherwise, you’re just choosing what to believe

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@ophello @TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer I’m not judging the topic itself. I cited a concrete case showing the consequences of accepting accounts as evidence. The audience consisted of believers who had paid to attend and likely would’ve swallowed the story whole without outsiders questioning it.

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer I’m not trying to be offensive or anything like that. It’s a joke. But it’s a joke that a lot of people are taking seriously. As I said, ufology has ceased to be a matter of science and has become a matter of belief. I detest people who exploit others' beliefs.

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@ophello @TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer Ok, i will.
This course was recommended to me. What do you think?

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@ophello @TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer "bombshell reports" which even ufologists have been calling a load of bullshit. There is also the issue that the reports seek to present evidence for something that "leaves no evidence behind."

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@ophello @TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer Doesn't it strike you as odd that, in every case, the lack of evidence becomes grounds for believing a cover-up is taking place? Not to mention the speculation about technology that can be neither proven nor falsified.

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@ophello @TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer The point is: "without leaving evidence behind" is a convenient speculation for "there is no evidence."
If all this is actually happening, eventually some evidence SHOULD remain.
A major problem with ufology is that it is generally more a creed than methodology

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@ophello @TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer Crash sites with no traces. Collected bodies with no pics or vids. Implants that vanish. Mental contact only among believers. Alien pregnancies with not a single cell left behind. Any ONE of these would be strong evidence.

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@ophello @TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer That is where an important difference lies: the claim is almost always highly speculative and never falsifiable, whereas the debunking is almost always quite evident and falsifiable.

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@felipe_son @TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer And he admitted it was a mistake.

You can’t just judge the entire topic based on the inevitable false positives that are impossible to eradicate.

You’re looking at the noise while ignoring the signal.

[Felipe Nunes @felipe_son]

@ophello @TBrighamPhd @DrBeaVillarroel @MiddleOfMayhem @ProfAviLoeb @michaelshermer Statement highly speculative, and even the reliable sources are questionable. Speculation is fine, but this leads to cases like this where no camera or radar detected it, nobody saw it in the city. Yet Lu tells hundreds at a conference he got the info from a “reliable source.”