Dino Felluga

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@jbond77 @NYBrowning1907 Looking forward to the conversation!

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@VicPoetryCaucus Anyone who needs the Zoom link at the last minute can email: [email protected]

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@Adamson_CW @navsa Yes, indeed!

[Dr Sasha Dovzhyk @sasha_weirdsley]

My article 'The Queer Little Grove: The Adoption of Aubrey Beardsley by Mikhail Kuzmin' has been published on BRANCH: Britain, Representation and Nineteenth-Century History: https://t.co/E9xZlzgssW

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@triproftri Anyone can email me to request our guidelines, if this interests you: [email protected]. It's also fun to annotate with students without the intention of publishing.

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@triproftri @mandellc happy to talk it over!

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@triproftri That is a possibility. Lorraine Janzen Kooistra did that successfully with a grad class; Ed Jacobs has a Le Fanu edition going through peer review that attempted the same. There is no guarantee that the editions will make it through peer review but students learn tons regardless

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

In the case of COVE, feedback on the platform, UI/UX are directed to me and I share it with our programmers and take it into consideration as I prepare new grant applications.

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@triproftri @dtracy2 Second, I provide guidance to the peer reviewers and make sure they read the intro and the submission paperwork, thus taking into account the intention of the work (is it for undergrads, scholars or the general public, for example?).

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@triproftri @dtracy2 To answer your question, I feel that there needs to be info that is clear on both sides: I provide authors with guidelines about how to prepare for peer review (what they should include, especially an editorial introduction that basically functions as a contract with readers.

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@triproftri Always thinking of how best to make use of existing platforms, with hopes to expand as funds allow.

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@triproftri Anything submitted for publication (including timelines, maps, galleries, annotated editions and supplemental essays) is peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field, as with all BRANCH material, then revised and copy-edited.

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@alisonfchapman @aktange @taliaschaffer1 @MVSA_77 @VISAWUS And password-protected—only accessible to other members.

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@alisonfchapman @aktange @taliaschaffer1 @MVSA_77 @VISAWUS The idea is not to record the talks (or to record just plenary talks). We would use COVE tools to comment on each other's papers, which would be uploaded (not recorded)

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@taliaschaffer1 @aktange The idea is not to record the talks (or to record just plenary talks). We would use COVE tools to comment on each other's papers, which would be uploaded (not recorded)

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@Cheeryble2 @AdrianWisnicki Adrian had to edit down so he may have taken out the slide that illustrates how COVE is the first instance. The long-term goal is to have multiple nodes (other field sites, other subject areas), all sharing authoritative content.

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

I'm happy to announce the next round of publications at BRANCH: by Martin Danahay (Brock U); Shannon Draucker (Boston U); Nathan K. Hensley (Georgetown U) and John Patrick James (Georgetown U); and Jonathan Mulrooney (College of the Holy Cross): https://t.co/AGE05Mti4w.

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@mwidner Hi Michael, an email to you at Stanford got bounced back to me. Do you have a new address?

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

New BRANCH articles at https://t.co/AGE05MbHcY by Nicholas Daly, Jill R. Ehnenn, Shanyn Fiske, Kathleen Frederickson, and Peter H. Hoffenberg!

[Dino Felluga @felluga]

@maryeborgo #NAVSA2017 Make sure you check out this BRANCH article by Christopher Rovee: https://t.co/GZ5hIIQr83