@manumerous@breadli428@zhaomingxie Also, I saw in many cases the RL policy makes use of knees or other parts of the body pretty well, which is not yet within the reach of MPC (if we refer MPC to solving OCP with SQP or DPP) since contact-implicit MPC is hard. Sampling-based might be more appealing in these cases
@antoine_leeman@breadli428 Maybe it's possible to learn a residual model to capture the aerodynamic effects using Gaussian Processes and run GP-MPC?π
@antoine_leeman@breadli428 Well if the aerodynamics model is differentiable, NLP solver can handle it quite well. But contact results in combinatorial nature, which is mixed-integer programming. Guess MPC can really play a big role in the control pipeline.
@antoine_leeman I'm always curious how do define robustness in legged locomotion. In locomotion tasks the goal is to maintain the pose of body frame, which seems to be more related to stability. But robust MPC aims to satisfy constraints under uncertainties. I wonder how to relate themπ