Feyi

trying my best or whatever

[Feyi @feyixa]

Sounds like a variability of demand problem. And now that I think about, this can absolutely be modeled

[Ewgi @Ssaasquatch]

I’ve always been curious about the operational logic behind how upscale restaurants work. Say I order jollof rice, why does it take 45 minutes to arrive? Why not prepare it in advance and simply finish and plate it once an order comes in? Surely that would significantly reduce the wait time without materially affecting the taste or texture. Restaurant people, please explain.

[Feyi @feyixa]

I am actually tempted to report all of them 😭. Enough is enough

[gatorade @kadetXx]

so you mean to tell me the intellectually disabled people defending that outlier tweet are the same ones working as “professionals” in data annotation? THIS IS WHY THE MODELS ARE GETTING DUMBER

top companies like meta, microsoft, deloitte, openai and even anthropic rely on data from scale for RHLF fine tuning on existing models + training for future frontier models and people who not only are too daft to understand immigration/tax laws but also cannot pass the skill assessments without cheating, are part of the workforce handling data annotation?

this can’t be good

[Feyi @feyixa]

i regret switching from cursor to claude code/cowork. idk but i get better (and faster) outputs in cursor and I liked being able to to use composer

[Feyi @feyixa]

I hope Dario and co have finally learned their lesson about fear mongering 💀

[Feyi @feyixa]

This is puzzling to me bc every other model can be jailbroken. So are we just going to stop releasing new models? I’m trying to understand what’s really going on here

[prinz @deredleritt3r]

Parsing this evening's events:

- The U.S. government approved the release of Fable 5 to the public, clearly under the presumption that the model's cybersecurity capabilities cannot be accessed by hackers, authoritarian regimes, etc.

- Recently (today?), "another company" showed the U.S. government that a jailbreak of Fable 5 *is possible*. Yes, a minor jailbreak - but how can a non-technical government official be assured that there aren't also other, more dangerous, jailbreaks in this model that won't be discovered by the CCP?

- Anthropic states, completely correctly, that: "We suspect that perfect jailbreak resistance is not currently possible for any model provider. Every safeguard used in the industry is vulnerable to non-universal jailbreaks (which can elicit some cyber information in specific circumstances), and it is likely that universal jailbreaks will eventually be found in the future. We stated this clearly when we released Fable 5."

- My best guess is that the U.S. government did not fully realize this at the time when the release of Fable 5 was approved.

- Per Axios, the government contacted Anthropic and asked to "pause releasing the... models but was unsuccessful" - i.e., Anthropic told the government to pound sand.

- Per Axios, this "prompt[ed] the export control letter".

- Per Axios, the U.S. government is *NOT* looking to restrict access to Fable to U.S. nationals forever. "The model needs to remain locked down until the U.S. governent's national security apparatus is hardened", which "could happen in a few weeks".

- I interpret Anthropic's reaction as challenging the government: "we believe the government should have the ability to block unsafe deployments, as part of a statutory process that is transparent, fair, clear, and grounded in technical facts. This action does not adhere to those principles."

If the Axios article is correct, I do not think any other model providers have anything to fear based solely on this evening's events, because: (1) they would hopefully be smarter than downright rejecting a request by the U.S. government to pause releasing a model, and (2) they will be required anyway under the recent executive order to give the U.S. government at least 30 days to test the model for cybersecurity capabilities - during which time the U.S. government would also be able to shore up its own cybersecurity defenses with the same model.

I remain extremely concerned that actions by one particular U.S. lab over the last few months might be moving us closer and closer to the scenario where at least that lab - and potentially all others - will be nationalized.

[Feyi @feyixa]

Very embarrassing to see these reactions to Monaco. The algo on this site promotes some of the most irritating things lord

[Feyi @feyixa]

How come I never get these credits? 🙄

[Mark Carney @MarkJCarney]

Today, money is going right into the bank accounts of more than 12 million Canadians. 

That’s the new Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit at work — giving a boost to Canadians who need it most.

[Feyi @feyixa]

Before I add this to my AI psychosis folder, did an LLM tell you to send this?

[Feyi @feyixa]

Hmm I know this isn’t true bc my google search results keep defaulting to AI mode

[philip lewis @Phil_Lewis_]

A Google spokesperson responded to this TechCrunch article:

“We’re continuing to display blue links on the search results page in addition to AI responses. If someone chooses to ask a follow-up from an AI Overview, or selects the AI Mode button in the Search box, then that takes them to AI Mode. It doesn’t happen automatically – people have to choose to navigate to AI Mode.” https://t.co/fztU0QzErY

[Feyi @feyixa]

I’ve decided to ignore this hantavirus news while I’m on this cruise 😭. Please I have things to do this summer

[Feyi @feyixa]

Everyone I know is trying to build agents but they don’t even know evals are 😭. Like people planning to package these agents as a service without any guardrails.

[tae kim @firstadopter]

The most ridiculous part of this is that Anthropic employees were repeatedly in people's X mentions, gaslighting customers and telling them they were wrong.

[Feyi @feyixa]

??? This is crazy. What do you mean chats are public? What’s really going on with these AI companies?

[Lovable @Lovable]

We were made aware of concerns regarding the visibility of chat messages and code on Lovable projects with public visibility settings.

To be clear: We did not suffer a data breach.

Our documentation of what “public” implies was unclear, and that’s a failure on us.

Specifically for public projects, chat messages used to be visible — this is now no longer possible.

When it comes to code of public projects: That is intentional behavior. We have experimented with different UX for how the build history is surfaced on public projects, but the core behavior has been consistent and by design.

Importantly, for enterprise customers, being able to set visibility to public for new projects has been disabled since May 25, 2025.

[Feyi @feyixa]

Nah they want to force me to pay for Claude. Still I resist!!!!

[Claude @claudeai]

Introducing Claude Managed Agents: everything you need to build and deploy agents at scale.

It pairs an agent harness tuned for performance with production infrastructure, so you can go from prototype to launch in days.

Now in public beta on the Claude Platform.

[Feyi @feyixa]

Ah i have to go read the system card wtf

[L @lanreadelowo]

Antrhopic made AGI and decided not to release it????

[Feyi @feyixa]

Sorry for them bc I will talk about this in every conversation 😭

[Ava Petrucci @mmeJen]

Believe it or not, your normie friends will not appreciate you warning them that an economic tidal wave is about to hit us and it will last for years.

Ask me how I know.

[Feyi @feyixa]

I’m actually in a good place in life but I’m so scared to admit I’m happy 😩

[Feyi @feyixa]

Almost 2 years without my brother. Feels like I’ve been reincarnated so many times since then but I’m still standing 😭. Like wow I’ve sleepwalked through so much. I pray I can triumph over the menace that is grief

[Feyi @feyixa]

I have to rethink using supabase for my backend with all these breaches. Time to go back to Wordpress or whatever 😂 this is too much

[Feyi @feyixa]

Can’t help but cackle at the developments in the past 24 hours 😭 guess our jobs are safe for now 🤣