@inquisitor111@Prita_o81@Se_Railway I didn't ask you to try and tell me this was how it's set up. You engaged with me. Fact is, if you have a virtual monopoly you should be controlling the situation, if you're not then you're failing
@inquisitor111@Prita_o81@Se_Railway Then you have reaffirmed my belief that management, by not exerting their position when taking a virtual monopoly, are incompetent
@inquisitor111@Prita_o81@Se_Railway Unfortunately, your views seem common across the Rail system with little desire to make the necessary improvements and defending the status quo
@inquisitor111@Se_Railway Nothing you have said has changed my mind. This is simple incompetence and apologists will not improve matters, only support its continuation
@inquisitor111@Se_Railway Apologetic responses like that will continue holding back vital infrastructure and just show there are those who want to ensure the trains continue to be incompetently managed
@inquisitor111@Se_Railway You can keep repeating this, however it doesn't change that if you operate a virtual monopoly and allow this to happen the blame is with SE - it's incompetent management. No proper business would allow this.
If you love @Lost___London, share this post and help others find a page that's dedicated to our beloved city.
Thank you for the support.
Hesperus Crescent, Isle of dogs, london, 1940. โณ๏ธ
@inquisitor111@Se_Railway No. You're fundamentally approaching this wrong. This shouldn't even be happening in the first place, with SE operating a virtual monopoly and giving this up on this is incompetent management.
@shjdj691953@Se_Railway Yes it is. Freight trains shouldn't be interfering with critical commuting infrastructure on this network. It's designed to cause maximum disruption any time there is an incident.