माननीय @myogiadityanath जी
UP में एक आम परिवार के साथ क्या यही न्याय है?
@TataCapital के कुछ अधिकारियों पर गंभीर सवाल खड़े हो रहे हैं। एक बेटे के Personal Loan की recovery के लिए उसकी माँ Shakuntala Gupta की लगभग ₹65-70 लाख की property को ₹35 लाख में बेचने की तैयारी की जा रही है।
सबसे गंभीर बात यह है कि आरोपों के अनुसार Shakuntala Gupta की property को Rahul Gupta के नाम से दिखाकर घर seal कराने का आदेश तक प्राप्त कर लिया गया।
सबसे बड़ा सवाल — क्या Personal Loan recovery के लिए SARFAESI Act जैसी कठोर प्रक्रिया का इस्तेमाल उचित है, जबकि RBI Guidelines recovery के लिए अलग प्रक्रिया बताती हैं?
मामला DRT और High Court में लंबित होने के बावजूद property बेचने की तैयारी जारी है। शायद बैंक को भरोसा है कि कोर्ट में फैसला आने में सालों लग जाएंगे और तब तक घ��� बिक जाएगा।
बड़ी संस्थाओं के पास बड़े lawyers और resources होते हैं, लेकिन एक सामान्य परिवार सीमित पैसों में कितने साल लड़ पाएगा?
यदि कुछ अधिकारी सिर्फ recovery targets पूरे करने के लिए ��िसी भी हद तक जा रहे हैं, तो उन पर कार्रवाई क्यों नहीं हो रही? कुछ अधिकारियों की वजह से पूरी संस्था की छवि खराब हो रही है।
@RBI @FinMinIndia @DFS_India @UPGovt @myogioffice
@dhruv_rathee
@lalantopi
@UPGovt
उम्मीद है प्रशासन और न्याय व्यवस्था इस मामले को निष्पक्ष रूप से देखेगी।
#Justice #UttarPradesh #SARFAESI #RBI #HighCourt #DRT
🔥 Trade setup is playing out exactly as planned.
HTF FVG → 50% discount area → LTF BOS → entry with SL above the high.
🎯 Target: 1:5 RR
Now it’s all about letting the setup play out and not interfering with the trade.
HTF bias. LTF confirmation. Defined risk. Let the RR work. 📉💯
My setup is based on a Higher Timeframe Fair Value Gap (FVG).
First, I identify the FVG on the higher timeframe and wait for price to enter the 50% discount area of that FVG.
Once price reaches the 50% area, I move to a lower timeframe and wait for a Break of Structure (BOS) to the downside as confirmation.
If the lower-timeframe bearish BOS occurs, I take a short trade. My stop loss is placed above the lower-timeframe swing high, while my target is the higher-timeframe low.
In simple terms:
HTF FVG → 50% area → LTF bearish BOS → Short Entry → SL above the high → TP at HTF low.
🚨 If you mention a rule in the terms and conditions but don’t clearly highlight or explain it, most traders won’t pay much attention to it.
So if you’re going to reject payouts for “High Margin Usage” above 80%, why provide traders with that margin in the first place?
Give traders only the margin they’re actually allowed to use.
A trader works hard, makes profits, and stays consistent…
then, at payout time: “High Margin Usage” → Payout Rejected. 🤦♂️
First, provide the margin.
Then punish the trader for using it.
How does that make sense? 🤷♂️
If high margin usage is a serious rule, it should be clearly highlighted, explained, and enforced from the beginning — not quietly mentioned in the terms and conditions and later used as another reason for payout rejection.
@BlueGuardiancom
@ZamcoCapital No intrest in selling on nq becouse no BOS in lower time frame in 50% discount area but in gold looking good for sell Waiting for BOF IN lower time frame
Same shit happening with @QtFunded again.
Just saw that post about the trader who dropped over $6.5k with them across 3 years, requested almost $60k in payouts… and got $0. First the big one rejected, then another $10k rejected, banned, support gone silent.
My turn now.
Account #10308723
$9,000 requested
$7,200 profit share
Status: Rejected
No real explanation. No clear proof. Just rejected.
These people let you pass, let you build profit, take your challenge fees… then the moment a real payout hits they invent some rule violation and cut you off.
New traders — don’t fall for it. They look legit until the money is supposed to leave their account. That’s when the excuses start.
Stay far away from these guys.
🚨 QT FUNDED — THIS IS NOT A SMALL PAYOUT DISPUTE
First $49,863 was reportedly rejected, and now another $10,000 payout has been rejected over an alleged OSB violation.
The trader @aaron_cfd says he has spent around $6,500 with QT Funded over 3 years.
According to the screenshots, when it came time for payouts, he was allegedly banned from the website and Discord, while his support request remained unresolved.
The trader also says QT’s OSB rule had already been removed before he purchased the accounts, and he has repeatedly requested the applicable rule and evidence behind the violation.
QT Funded’s current rules do list one-sided betting as a prohibited practice, so the timing and version of the rules applicable to these accounts are important.
@QTFunded — which rule version applied when these accounts were purchased, and what specific evidence supports the OSB finding?
$59K+ in disputed payouts and $6.5K reportedly spent. This deserves a clear, case-specific explanation. 👀
@QtFunded@AlexQuantTekel
On the lower timeframe I wait for a Break of Structure (BOS).
Once BOS happens — I take the trade.
SL goes on the lower-timeframe high/low
Target is the higher-timeframe level
Full setup:
HTF FVG → 50% area → LTF BOS → Entry → LTF SL → HTF Target
After 5–6 years of searching, this is the one I’m finally going to stick with, collect data on, and actually master.
Maybe this is the setup I’ve been looking for all these years.
Been trading for about 5–6 years now.
Almost every single week I catch myself thinking:
“Okay, this is it. I’ve finally figured it out.”
Then the next week starts.
One or two trades go right, confidence goes up…
and then the losses start again.
I’ve tried so many setups I can’t even count them.
But I never stopped searching.
I think I’ve finally found the one I actually want to stick with.
👇 keep reading
It starts on the higher timeframe.
I look for a Fair Value Gap (FVG).
Then I wait for price to come into the 50% area of that FVG.
I don’t enter just because price reaches the zone.
I drop to the lower timeframe and wait for confirmation.
The chart makes it clear.
👇 now the entry