Fishface

Believer in the power of common ground, where truth and fairness thrive, fostering mutual learning and understanding. Politically Homeless. Relax. Take it easy.

[dejanira @dejanirasilveir]

🚨⚠️Von der Leyen cobra 35.800 EUROS al mes, se ha auto subido el sueldo 8 veces en 4 años y nos dice que ahorremos porque gastamos mucho, mientras ella se da la gran vida

¿Alguien la ha elegido?

DEBE LARGARSE Y SE JUZGADA 🔥

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

Listen to Nigel Farage talk about Islam, then listen to Rupert Lowe

Nigel says we can't alienate Islam

Rupert says it's a cult and is completely the opposite of everything our democracy stands for

The choice is clear

[HJB News @HJB_News__]

Never forget in 2003 Keir Starmer won the case that gave illegal migrants access to UK benefits. Twenty three years later, we're living in the chaos he created.

[Daily Mail @DailyMail]

Andy Burnham suggests he will give asylum seekers the right to work...despite warnings Britain will become a bigger magnet for small boat migrants https://t.co/HwBYfi6CB1

[Vivid.🇮🇱 @VividProwess]

Palestinian students at UNRWA schools:

“Stabbing Jews brings dignity to the Palestinians. We have to stab the Jews. They teach us that Jews are terrorists. I am ready to stab a jew and drive a car over them. I am ready to join ISIS.”

Does this seem like a normal society to you?

[Fishface @fishfacejohnny]

@Keir_Starmer Don't bother looking for positive responses @Keir_Starmer.

[Catherine Blaiklock @blaiklockBP]

Brilliant

[Fishface @fishfacejohnny]

@BGatesIsaPyscho @Otagon1

[Fishface @fishfacejohnny]

@Alexandr4Denman So sorry @Alexandr4Denman . There must be many like you. Could you form a group with like-minded folk, pool your talents and ideas on how to proceed. It hurts us to think your skills and dedication is being wasted/ignored. The gov. don't care. 😢

[dejanira @dejanirasilveir]

🚨🚨SE LE ESCAPÓ‼️
Keir Starmer, Primer Ministro británico, hizo una ADMISIÓN⚠️

“Se podrían introducir tarjetas de identificaciónes digitales (ID Digital) para acceder al DINERO”.
O SEA TU DINERO ⚠️

🔴CLARITO COMO EL AGUA; LOS NEGOCIOS DE LA ELITE PERVERSA EN MARCHA ⚠️🔥

[Fishface @fishfacejohnny]

@RupertLowe10

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I am a member of the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament and we have just released our findings on Britain’s broken asylum system. It is beyond damning.

Some extracts from our report…

“…Government departments still do not have a grip on how they will manage asylum as an end-to-end system, or a clear sense of what they are trying to achieve.”

“Major policy risks and operational changes have been pursued without a realistic grip on delivery risks, costs or system-wide impacts.”

“…no single point of accountability for outcomes or a governance structure for the end-to-end system.”

“…absence of a clear strategy, decisions around planning and resource allocation have been reactive and disjointed.”

“The Home Office was unable to show… that it has the commercial capabilities needed to manage asylum accommodation effectively.”

“…weaknesses in its ability to prevent excess profits accruing for contractors…”

“…no evidence that lessons from past mistakes are being used to clearly inform current actions.”

“Poor data quality and weak management information continue to prevent effective management…”

“…current data sharing limitations make it impossible to directly track individual cases through the entire asylum process.”

“The Home Office does not yet have a credible long-term strategy for asylum accommodation…”

“… there is little evidence the Home Office fully understands the impact of its approach on local services.”

“The government is at considerable risk of repeating past failures.”

But don’t worry, the government says it has a plan...

It says it has “learned a lot of lessons”.

And that it’s going to put 10,000 civil servants into what they call an “Asylum Group”.

Funded by us, of course.

How about improving data-linking systems?

The Ministry of Justice says it simply needs more of our money.

And what about ending the use of hotels and transferring to larger, “purpose-driven” sites?

“The Home Office’s own analysis suggests that large sites will cost more than hotels, as seen in previously costly attempts such as Wethersfield.”

The numbers…

£4.9 billion spent on the system each year, including:
£2.7 billion on asylum accommodation
£700 million on cash support
£600 million on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
Nearly £1 billion on casework, appeals, detention, and removal

All spent to produce between 50,000 or so refugees each year.

And of course, these costs don’t include what is then paid by us, the taxpayer, in Local Authority housing, welfare, childcare assistance, and advice and translation services once once they receive their refugee status and are no longer in the asylum system.

Want more?

At the time of the NAO report (December 2025), Home Office reported there were roughly 224,000 individuals still waiting in the system, excluding those awaiting an initial asylum decision.

Further, since April 2024, MoJ say the number of asylum seekers waiting for an appeal decision alone has trebled, from 27,000 to 70,000, with appeals taking nearly 60 weeks to be heard.

Who pays for them while they wait over a year for a decision?

Us.

And the tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers each year - what happens to them?

The Home Office isn’t sure.

It says it knows “where some of them are”, but the rest are “elsewhere in the country”, and that it is possible they “remain in the UK without detection”.

Don’t fear though, because the Home Office won’t guarantee that it will find them, only that it would “seek to find them”. Whatever the hell that means…

And to deal with the backlog of cases and appeals?

“Home Office relaxed its recruitment arrangements, resulting in newly recruited staff being ill-suited to making complex decisions on asylum cases, which in turn affected decision quality.”

The result?

“In a rolling twelve months to May 2025, 42% of sampled decisions had significant or fail errors.”

Astounding incompetence.

But there’s more good news...

The MoJ is recruiting even more over-paid salaried and fee-paid judges, as well as recruiting judges from other chambers to sit in asylum cases.

In other words, MoJ’s response is to spend more of our money and remove judges from other work.

This is because more asylum seekers “are now representing themselves and that this requires additional support from tribunal staff.”

“The system of monitoring failed asylum seekers needs a complete overhaul,” says the report.

I have a better idea. My own view?

Scrap the entire system altogether, and deport every single illegal migrant living in Britain.

And to those of you say that it’s impossible - to any MPs, public servants, or commentators who think I’m cherry-picking information, I implore you to read every word of the PAC report, every word of the NAO report, and to watch every minute of the 2.5 hour PAC meeting from earlier this year…

And then tell me that the system is working, and that’s it’s delivering value for money, and that it’s sustainable.

It isn’t. And it never will be.

It is an intentional, monumental catastrophe designed to cripple the nation economically, socially, and culturally.

A Restore Britain government will crush the entire asylum system as its first duty to the British people.

Deport them all.

[Fishface @fishfacejohnny]

@WatsonEssays @Econosave @Dominic2306 @RupertLowe10 Don't underestimate Rupert.

[Emmett Elvin @ElvinEmmett6556]

@Dominic2306 We have reached that glorious point where almost our every politician have no choice but to parade their rank hypocrisy, tangled as they are in the web of deceit they themselves created.
And it will only get more obvious from here, hoist by their own ludicrous, venal petard.

[The Telegraph @Telegraph]

'If you want to know what sort of man Sir Keir Starmer is, consider these two clues'

'First, note how slow he was to make any public comment about the murder of Henry Nowak. And second, note how quick he was to condemn his political opponents for speaking up about it.'

Read Michael Deacon's full column 👇
https://t.co/rU5639b8pV

[Robert Jenrick @RobertJenrick]

‘I’m sticking with Reeves’s fiscal rules, but I don’t know what they are’.

It’s an insult to the British people that this is the best Labour can offer.

[Steve Howell @FromSteveHowell]

This tells you all you need to know...

Burnham wouldn't have Corbyn back in the party (if he applied), but he "would like to continue working with Simons," who was a key player in the Mandelson-McSweeney-Starmer project.

Burnham is business as usual. https://t.co/XJ6Hutr4of

[Julia Hartley-Brewer @JuliaHB1]

This is almost funny coming from the Green Party deputy leader, pictured here with his wife.

[David Atherton @daveatherton]

Supremely powerful image.

[Fishface @fishfacejohnny]

@bigfanofmykids He doesn't know.