Negro Fonseca

Envejezco y feliz morire, agradecido con la vida..loco por comer bien,..opino porque quiero un mundo mejor.

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

😱😱😱

[Juan Burgos🇲🇽🇺🇦🇮🇱🇺🇸 @juanburgos]

Loreto, Mulegé, en Baja California Sur y San Carlos, Guaymas y Ciudad Obregón en Sonora unas de las ciudades que les va a pasar por encima el Huracán Polo. Ojalá estén preparados, es un monstruo.

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

😍😍😍😍

[𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗠𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀 @Old_But_Gold50s]

It’s hard to imagine what it must have felt like to sit in a concert hall hundreds of years ago and hear music like this for the very first time. The music of that era must have felt almost otherworldly, like stepping into another world.

Listen to Vivaldi’s summer through the mesmerizing playing of Mari Samuelsen: “Summer” from “The Four Seasons.”

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@gdehoyoswalther @ceciliasotog @RuffoAppel @VRveritas @SomosMxMexico @acostanaranjo Que hijos de puta !

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@jorgegogdl Cría cuervos 🐦‍⬛ y te sacarán los ojos 👀… dicen

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@cronicabanqueta Lamentablemente ya no hacen el delicioso ALMON RIS ! 😩😩😩

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@IndianaFever Good luck 🍀

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@letstalkksports Yes

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@olipunto 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

Para todos los de la 4T son campañas de difamación ! 🤬🤬🤬🤬

[Melissa Ⓜ️ @Melissa_Bely]

¡ Se puso a chillar !

Octavio Romero se dice víctima de campaña perversa de difamación.

Niega tener ingresos superiores a la Presidenta.

“Yo tengo un sueldo equivalente a un subsecretario de Estado"

Dice...

"No somos iguales"

También dice..

Disfruten.

👇

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@CaitlinClark22 Good luck 🍀!

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@CaitlinClark22 Congratulations, you deserve it !!!

[My name is M. Only M @musicandsoularg]

¿Y si el mayor peligro para nuestra sociedad no fuera la maldad, sino la estupidez?

La alarmante teoría de Dietrich Bonhoeffer que explica el mundo de hoy.

La Teoría de la Estupidez de Bonhoeffer:
El peligro silencioso
Durante los años más oscuros de la Alemania nazi, el teólogo y pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer reflexionó desde su celda sobre cómo una sociedad culta y moderna había caído en la barbarie colectiva.

Su conclusión fue revolucionaria y alarmante:
la estupidez es un enemigo del bien mucho más peligroso que la maldad misma.

👉 ¿Por qué es más peligrosa que la maldad?
Contra la maldad se puede luchar:
se puede denunciar, combatir e incluso legislar en su contra.
El malvado, en el fondo, suele tener conciencia de que está rompiendo las reglas.

Con la estupidez, en cambio, estamos completamente indefensos.
La persona dominada por ella es impermeable a los argumentos lógicos y a los hechos objetivos.
Si se le presentan pruebas que contradicen sus dogmas, simplemente las ignora o las tacha de irrelevantes.
Al sentirse completamente segura de sí misma, se vuelve agresiva y sumamente peligrosa al ser confrontada.

No es un defecto intelectual, sino moral
Bonhoeffer aclaró que esto no tiene nada que ver con el coeficiente intelectual o el nivel educativo. Existen mentes brillantes que operan bajo una profunda estupidez y personas sencillas que desbordan sabiduría moral.
La estupidez ocurre cuando un individuo renuncia voluntariamente a su capacidad de juicio propio.

👉 El contagio social y el rol del poder
Para el pensador, la estupidez es un fenómeno sociológico.
Observó que el ascenso de una fuerte estructura de poder (política o religiosa) infecta de estupidez a gran parte de la población.
Al integrarse a un grupo o adoptar ciegamente una ideología, el individuo sacrifica su independencia interior.

En este estado, la persona ya no piensa por sí misma:
se convierte en un repetidor de eslóganes, consignas y narrativas prefabricadas.
Al delegar su conciencia al colectivo, se transforma en una herramienta dócil capaz de cometer o justificar las mayores atrocidades sin experimentar remordimiento alguno.

👉 La conclusión de Bonhoeffer
La estupidez no se cura con más instrucción o datos, sino con un acto de liberación interna y coraje moral.
Hasta que el individuo no recupere la valentía de examinar sus ideas de forma autónoma y de tolerar la incomodidad de contradecir a su propio grupo, seguirá atrapado en este peligroso letargo.

[Oscar Barbera @OscarBarbera7]

Todos quemaron el video en Wembley, pero la verdadera mística está acá. En este ensayo, #GeorgeMichael ya sabía que su pareja tenía VIH y cantaba con el alma rota. Miren a #DavidBowie al fondo; sabía que presenciaba historia pura. Aprendan lo que es una estrella. 🧵👇

[Revista Nexos @nexosmexico]

Se calcula la llegada de africanos a Nueva España en unos 200 mil. Hubo mulatas que poseían esclavos, esclavas adineradas que tenían comercios, esclavas que exigían escoger el amo al que serán vendidas.

Es un universo más complejo de lo que imaginamos.
https://t.co/gZBxEnc5lh..

[N. Parish Flannery @NathanielParish]

🇺🇸💥🇲🇽The U.S.-Mexico relationship is entering a dangerous period of tension not seen since the Mexican-American War started in 1846.

🇺🇸👉Trump continues to publicly belittle Mexico while also making threats of launching some kind of military strike on Mexican soil. He doesn't seem to understand the potential fallout from ruining the world's most incredible example of cross-border political, economic, & cultural cooperation. Mexico is the U.S.'s most important trade partner and a key ally on so many policy issues ranging from water to migration.

📰 In a recent @HoustonChron opinion column, former members of Congress @CShays and @RichardSwett6 make an important point: before Washington talks about military action against Mexican cartels, it should look much more closely at what is already working — and at the role the U.S. itself plays in the drug trade.

3⃣💡 Three points stand out:

🇲🇽🪖1. Mexico is already taking the fight to the cartels.

The Mexican government has dramatically increased pressure on cartel leadership, infrastructure, laboratories and finances.

Mexican authorities report major drug seizures, the dismantling of more than 1,150 clandestine laboratories, the seizure of more than 1 million fentanyl pills, a roughly 25% reduction in daily homicides and the extradition of high-profile cartel figures to the U.S.

The DOJ has also publicly praised the unprecedented level of security cooperation with Mexico.

None of this means the cartels have been defeated. They haven't.

But the idea that Mexico is simply refusing to confront them — or that the U.S. needs to intervene militarily because Mexico isn't doing enough — doesn't match the evidence.

(💡It is true, however, that President Claudia Sheinbaum could do more to confront politicians from her own party who have been accused of colluding with cartels.)

🇺🇸💰🔫2. The U.S. is part of the cartel business model.

This is the point Americans often overlook.

The drug trade isn't simply a problem Mexico exports to the United States.

American demand creates the market.

💰U.S.-based financial networks help move and launder cartel money.

🔫Large quantities of firearms used by Mexican criminal organizations originate in the United States.

👀Under Trump's watch the U.S. has cut down seizures of U.S. guns & ammo being smuggled into Mexico.

📉"U.S. penalties for money laundering and sanctions violations fell 61% in 2025, amid a broader reduction in financial crime enforcement. Between February 2025 and January 2026, outbound handgun and long-gun border seizures by U.S. Customs and Border Protection fell by nearly 50%, while outbound ammunition seizures dropped by nearly 70%," Shays and Swett explain.

🌎Money & guns flow south from U.S. into Mexico. International supply chains provide the precursor chemicals used to manufacture synthetic drugs.

In other words, the cartel business model depends on much more than what happens on the Mexican side of the border.

Military action against Mexico wouldn't solve any of these problems.

🇺🇸🇲🇽3. The U.S.-Mexico relationship is much more interconnected than the rhetoric in Washington suggests.

Mexico isn't simply America's southern border.

It is America's largest trading partner, a major manufacturing partner and a critical part of North American supply chains.

The security relationship is equally interconnected.

Mexico needs U.S. intelligence, technology and cooperation to dismantle sophisticated criminal organizations.

The U.S. needs Mexico to control its side of the border, disrupt cartel networks and cooperate on extraditions, intelligence and investigations.

That means the real strategic question isn't whether the U.S. can pressure Mexico harder.

It's whether Washington can find ways to make the two countries more effective working together. Right now, discussions about security cooperation are taking place parallel to talks about the future of USMCA.

🇲🇽👀The big takeaway:

The U.S.-Mexico relationship is not a zero-sum relationship in which every Mexican success is somehow an American concession.

Mexico's success against the cartels is an American interest.

More effective Mexican institutions are an American interest. (Even if Trump generally doesn't seem to understand the value of strong institutions and capable, well-staffed, independent government agencies & isn't likely to prod Mexico to take steps he wouldn't push at home.)

Reducing the flow of fentanyl, cartel money & firearms requires cooperation across the border — not pretending that the problem exists entirely on 1 side of it.

Yes, the U.S. has enormous leverage over Mexico.

❌ But, a U.S. military intervention in Mexico would risk provoking President Sheinbaum & poisoning the relationship Washington needs in order to address the problems Trump says he cares about most.

🇲🇽📗On episode 13 of my @ModernMexico Podcast I spoke to historian Peter Guardino about his book, THE DEAD MARCH: A HISTORY OF THE MEXICAN-AMERICAN WAR, which describes how in 1847 when invading U.S. soldiers marched into the Zocalo in Mexico City, residents climbed onto the roofs of buildings in the centro to pelt the U.S. troops with bricks & rocks. It's easy to imagine how unilateral military action against Mexico today could lead to a new "Straight of Hormuz" quagmire for Trump if he blows up cooperation with Mexico on so many key issues.

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@Sophiecunnin7 Yes

[Love Music @khnh80044]

She has one of the most powerful and controlled voices ever, and you can feel her passion pouring through every single note. ❤️🎶

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@CityScapesNC A

[🦋 🌷Love Music 🎶 & Dance 💃🏻🕺🏻 @Tiana_Celine_23]

She Didn’t Try to Own Jolene. She Just Sat Down and Sang It.

Most covers want to prove something. A bigger voice. A new arrangement. A reminder that the singer still matters. Miley Cyrus’s Backyard Sessions version of “Jolene” does none of that.

She sits outside in daylight. No stage. No costume change. No dramatic lighting. A guitar, a chair, and a song written decades earlier by a woman begging another woman not to take her man. That is the whole setting. It should feel too simple. Instead, it feels unfinished in the right way - like you walked in on someone who was already telling the truth before the camera started.

The original song is already bare. Dolly Parton did not hide behind poetry. “Please don’t take him just because you can.” There is nowhere to hide in a line like that. Miley does not add a hiding place. Her voice is lower, rougher, a little worn. She does not polish the fear out of it. She lets the fear stay in the room.

What stays with you is the restraint. She does not climb for a note that will impress anyone. She does not break the song open at the chorus so the audience can clap. She stays close to the lyric, almost as if she is speaking to one person across a table. When she says the name Jolene, there is a small pause, the kind people make when they are about to ask for something they already suspect they will not get.

That is why the clip still works. It is not nostalgia for a younger Miley, and it is not a museum piece for Dolly. It is a woman sitting in ordinary light and admitting a very old kind of helplessness: beauty can take what love is trying to keep. She does not decorate that fact. She does not argue with it. She just sings it until it becomes hard to look away.

A lot of performances ask to be watched. This one does not. It occupies the space so quietly that attention starts to feel like the only honest response. Years later, that is still the reason people come back to it. Not because it is clever. Because it is plain. And plain, when it is true, lasts longer than spectacle.

[Negro Fonseca @flamenconegro]

@Luna_4w A