@johnstone_mikey@MrStephenHowson@MU_ST As i said i could argue all night but the issue here is broadcasters all fighting over the tv rights. Thats why we pay more and more every years for sky and bt. Amazon, disney and who ever else wants a go will join in soon so it goes up
@johnstone_mikey@MrStephenHowson@MU_ST we are 3rd biggest in the revenue charts yet we lag behind in the game. The glzers are not the issue here. Broadcasting rights are the reason we are arguing. More money more money for tv rights. They are the reason that every club is trying to find alternative revenue sources
@johnstone_mikey@MrStephenHowson@MU_ST In what world would a 50+1 stop united paying over the odds for players and wages? We can only pay those ridiculous fees due to the way united is ran
@johnstone_mikey@MrStephenHowson@MU_ST I could argue about this all night. We go on about the money that the club has lost but if the money we have is not being invested in properly what difference does a change in ownership bring? Throwing money at a problem doesnt fix the issue
@johnstone_mikey@MrStephenHowson@MU_ST No no no united have paid big money for transfers and wages for a long time. Do you want them to keep throwing 300k a week at players and not winning anything? They can do that under what the way united can do commercially but its not winning anything
@johnstone_mikey@MrStephenHowson@MU_ST Financially speaking the glazers have made united a power house in the market. They also took the tamp bay buccaneers to a super bowl. In football terms united have been mismanaged and thats now down to them