Excited to announce we're developing version 2 of our Flink network layer, now written in Go! This rewrite will unlock new possibilities for speed and efficiency. Stay tuned for updates!
I joined Bitcoin in 2013 to support economic freedom, censorship resistance & more
I left BTC for the same reasons in 2017
No longer Digital Cash as the Bitcoin whitepaper described
Reduced to just being digital gold; purely speculative, useless & therefore without true impact
PoW and PoS are not consensus mechanisms, but rather Sybil resistance mechanisms for block production
And no, block producers do not control a blockchain unilaterally, they are held accountable by full nodes
At the end of the day, itโs all social consensus
Please follow Ian Scarffe on twitter https://t.co/URgn3L65vg and as Ian Scarffe announces the Advisory role, news and articles, please retweet the posts. It will greatly help us to gain more traction.
Ianโs overall mission is to foster a society of economically independent individuals who are engaged citizens, contributing to the improvement of their communities across the world.
Ian Scarffe is a serial entrepreneur, investor and consultant with business experience from around the world. A leading expert in Startup, Investment, Fintech and Blockchain industries. Ian currently consults and advises for a range of multi-million dollar companies.
Note that cross-rollup apps within one zone of sovereignty are still fine. Not also that this also is a limit to the "modular blockchains" vision: you can't just pick and choose a separate data layer and security layer. Your data layer must be your security layer.
My argument for why the future will be *multi-chain*, but it will not be *cross-chain*: there are fundamental limits to the security of bridges that hop across multiple "zones of sovereignty". From https://t.co/3g1GUvuA3A: