@SteveinLC Yeah, fine. The problem with fees is that they obscure the actual cost.
Ticket price listed at $25. Great, I’ll take 4. Then the checkout price is 156 bucks. It’s annoying. Just tell me the price is 39 dollars up front.
@BILLKEANE19@RealBrittHughes What if she actually believes trans folks should be allowed to play sports?
Is she allowed to shut up and play basketball? Life doesn’t seem to be letting that happen.
@MaggieLJohnson@RedditCFB “The Big Ten only took them because they were AAU.”
No, AAU status was a pre requisite but that wasn’t the motivation. They were added because they were a big national football brand (TV ratings) contiguous with the rest of the conference and they were a good cultural fit.
@Klubbermeister@iowahawkblog Twice in the last hour from official WNBA Twitter. They do it all the time. But yes, the original tweet here was from ESPN.
@SentinelNine9@humads@coalcountrywvu Yeah but grok is ignoring the part where the conference would also drop Rutgers and Maryland.
This isn’t a simple addition of Cal and Stanford. They’re replacing two bottom feeders.
@humads@jefferies88@coalcountrywvu Right, but in this scenario, the B1G is dropping Maryland and Rutgers, who were only added because of cable subscriptions which is becoming irrelevant.
So the question in this scenario is whether the Big Ten would trade Maryland and Rutgers for Stanford and Cal.
@humads@coalcountrywvu Eh. I’d bet big ten would be willing to trade Maryland and Rutgers for Cal and Stanford, especially if it meant the SEC was losing Texas and OU for the trash they get in return in this tweet.
@Rj_douce1@stillnothawkize No it’s not. It corrects for the fact that 3s are worth more points but harder to make.
The bottom line is they shoot the same number of shots and Caitlin scores more points. Therefore, Caitlin is more efficient, although it’s so close as to not be a major difference.
@humads@JakeBrendTV So why do we need to get rid of cyhawk if we have so many high profile conference games in the future? That schedule looks tough as hell. I certainly don’t want to add an elite non con game to it. If we’re going to play a mediocre team, why not just stick with the cyclones?
@JeffreyTheGreek@A_Mar32 Just live in the moment. Enjoy watching your team beat the tar out of a hated rival so you can feel superior to your friends, neighbors and coworkers.
I could give a shit about playing Arizona or Duke or Pitt.
@Hassel_Chris@ChrisMWilliams@IowaEverywhere Hassel is correct. Other people (not me) want to end it because they see no benefit in playing ISU. If we win, it doesn’t help SOS or national perception. Losing sucks. No win.
No one said that before McCarney because that was irrelevant to the greater goal back then.
@JeffreyTheGreek We play our conf rivals less frequently. Divisions are gone. So much has changed and most of us think it sucks.
I want to hold on to a game that MATTERS TO ME every year even if we’re bad. I want to beat ISU! I don’t care if SEC fans don’t watch it. Everyone I know watches it.
@JeffreyTheGreek Read it. Don’t get it.
Is the long term goal to just play 12 random teams with the ultimate goal to qualify for the playoffs (then lose) every 5-10 years? That’s why we’re playing? Because we’ll never win a natty. Conf championships are going away. Bowl games don’t matter.