Instead of this format where dumb people and opinions gets over-represented we should have a jubilee video where 20 climate scientists bully a climate change denier until they cry.
This thread is very astute: the scholars and intellectuals who predicted the rise of Trumpism were largely humanists with training in philosophy, history, etc. NOT quantitative social scientists. To use one of myriad examples, Richard Rorty had this pegged three decades ago.
The rise of MAGA should inspire a massive paradigm shift in the study of U.S. political science towards more historical & cultural approaches. The reigning schools—institutionalism, behavioralism & rat'l choice—all failed to grasp the biggest event in US politics in a generation
The neo-Nazis told police they had never received such a violent response as the one they received in Columbus, and claimed people threw cans and veggies. https://t.co/8iorwSfn9R
Ohio is in population decline, continues to fall in all education metrics, and like half the state is employed by auto manufacturers about to get slammed with tariffs….and this is what our state government is worried about
Surprised, Outraged and Can’t Understand What is Going On
I used to have a ritualistic argument with my partner concerning her affective politics. Whether she is talking about coal mining, abortion, Zionist colonialism or opposition to bike lanes in the city, she always expresses
Sherrod Brown has done nothing but work his ass off for Ohioans and will lose his seat to a car salesman whose entire platform is “I hate trans people and I love Donald Trump” I am disgusted
It is the most egregious ballot language manipulation ever pulled off in Ohio. But when you have a state supreme court that determines boneless wings can have bones and laws limited to a single subject can have multiple subjects, you can kinda do what you want.