@VladdViever@monolith94@Sierkovitz Sure, if you think Mark is crafting a narrative so they can put more UB in the game despite people disliking it, I can’t disprove that. But to what end? Why is that likely, compared to the totally reasonable thing that lots of people (but not everyone!) actually like it?
@VladdViever@monolith94@Sierkovitz That doesn’t mean those people don’t hate it! It sucks for them! But Mark’s been pretty clear that those people are a small minority, and so they’re not going to change, even though they’ve heard the feedback.
@VladdViever@monolith94@Sierkovitz That’s because people think not changing in response to feedback is the same as that feedback being ignored.
Wizards can only make one Magic. If 90% of players like something and 10% hate it, they’re going to keep doing it.
@patio11 UK government software is surprisingly competent as a general rule! It does have a problem of too many edge cases in the actual regulations meaning a bunch of them end up with “sorry, we didn’t build a flow for that, go find the form”, but the main stuff is good.
@patio11 Relational calculus and SQL are both useful things to teach, but they’re useful to teach to different sets of people with different goals. And the fact that we don’t separate those two and just have faculty fight about which one to teach is silly.
@patio11 This is the science/engineering split, which for some reason is bundled together in one department in computing, much to its detriment. You wouldn’t expect to learn beam loading equations in a physics program, and you’d be horrified not to learn it in a civil engineering one.
@patio11 Also blurry lines are everywhere. Somewhere emails cross from useful product announcements to spam, but nobody agrees where. If someone structures their affairs to legally receive more Social Security income, are they a parasite or are they properly responding to incentives?
@patio11@MrKapitalist@Bootlegregore We already get indictments showing snippets from someone’s Google search history, definitely only a matter of time before ChatGPT logs serve the same role.
@patio11 In the interest of pedantry, your “drafting error” commentary is sadly in error. That’s how lists with a conjunction are commonly written in legal documents. See, for instance, 11 USC 101(9)(A). (https://t.co/pm7w9NYT1F)
@patio11 The UK rates pretty highly here. Faster Payments is approximately instant for most payments, and recent rules changes have made reimbursement for fraud almost universally available up to £85k (customer eats £100).
@patio11 One way to solve the UK immigrant bank address verification catch-22 is to have your US bank mail a replacement statement to your UK address. UK banks trust bank statements, US banks generally will mail a statement anywhere, done.
@patio11 Tradeoffs everywhere. Another one is that an SSN unlocks many government systems because the SSA makes getting one very difficult. If getting a new SSN were easy, then other systems would become harder to interact with to compensate.
@patio11 This reminds me of moving to the UK and being caught in the address verification catch-22. Google had a thing in their relocation docs that basically said “Print this letter, go to this branch down the road from the office, they will give you a bank account.”