ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@SeanCarleton I am so sorry you have to put up with all the trolls and bots under your always excellent posts!

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@rosendo_joe This is yet another media piece to encourage people turning on each other rather than the actual culprits: the super wealthy elite, corporations, and the politicians serving them.

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@ColinDMello Well, it's not like Ontario is a democracy anymore.

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@cooleditphoto @Grochowa2 This is way too big for chicken. Veal or pork.

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@PolesWires @MayorOliviaChow @ausmalik Because we are not a world-class city?

[Alex @X_Menace_Al]

@Phil_Lewis_ The future is now, and the era of Slopper is just getting started.

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.

Her name is Audrey van der Meer.

She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.

The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.

Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.

Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.

When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.

The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.

When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.

Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.

Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.

The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.

Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.

Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.

Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.

Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.

Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.

A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.

The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.

The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.

The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.

That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.

Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.

Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.

Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.

You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.

The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.

Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@arnesa_kustura

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@arnesa_kustura I am in awe of your resiliency and strength. And patience in explaining genocide over and over again.

[Nick Kapur @nick_kapur]

An auditor for the Ontario, Canada government found that AI agents tasked with turning doctor/patient conversations into structured notes routinely hallucinated false treatments, replaced drug names with entirely different drugs, and missed crucial information

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@stustin De-risk the projects? WTF? Mark Carney on March 09, 2025: “We think builders should be incentivized for taking risks,” he said on stage in Ottawa, “and rewarded when they succeed" He is making my head spin!

[✦ DANTE 🍉 @Iuckyshots]

ai isn’t profitable. once it collapses theyre going to be making money off of our data

it’s surveillance thats why theyre pushing so hard for digital id and normalizing how invasive everything has become

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@NickofMars1 @corruptario

[Sony Thăng @nxt888]

Let's talk about the word "complex."

The "complex situation in Gaza."

The "complex history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

The "deeply complex geopolitical dynamics."

The situation is not complex.

The situation is: a military force with overwhelming technological superiority is killing a large number of civilians in a territory from which those civilians cannot escape.

They have been doing this for decades at varying intensities.

The people in the territory had their land taken, their movement controlled, their economy strangled, their political choices vetoed by external powers.

That is not complex.

That is a description of power applied to people who have no comparable power to apply back.

The reason they call it "complex" is not because it is.

The reason is that clarity produces a demand.

Clarity produces: then something must be done.

Complexity produces: well, it's very difficult to know what to do.

"Complex" is the word that stands between comprehension and responsibility.

It is a load-bearing word in the architecture of inaction.

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@TomPark1n Alberta, Canadian sacred cow.

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@DesmondCole @atRachelGilmore Is she intend to buy it from Turkey, under the table?

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@camus_absurd @TomPark1n Sure! Can we start with the problem at hand though?

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@GrimKim @mags_mclaugh In Canada or Louisiana?♥️

[ᗴᐯᗩ ᗩᑎᗪ ᕼᗴᖇ ᑕᗩ丅ᔕ @flowinchange]

@Grochowa2 'Canada has become a next great fire sale'