Just give us an incline. A tiny sliver of indication that you believe in your own company…..
@evanspiegel any ceo should care about share price!!!
all it takes is a reetweet to make wall
street aware that contrarian to public opinion you do care about the share price!
@ncaioalves@evanspiegel@specs@specsfordevs Just give us an incline. A tiny sliver of indication that you believe in your own company…..
@evanspiegel
all it takes is a reetweet to make wall
street aware that contrarian to public opinion you do care about the share price!
@BoxLongs Specs failing is probably more bullish than Specs mildly succeeding. Whatever leads to them shutting it down quicker
Turn on profitability engine, layoff 50%
We’ll pre-order a set of $SNAP specs for the kids to play with it and keep people updated on timeline.
Im very neutral on this so will give honest opinions when I try them out myself. Programming seems too geared around kids. I don’t expect to be able to see an addition on my home, because Evan is too dumb to come up with a practical idea and developers will focus on nonsense kid stuff.
My 3 year old will love them.
Want to expand further into my thinking here.
A decade from now, the most valuable asset will be users’ attention and time.
There will be an abundance of advanced chips, AI, and software, and there won’t be the excess demand we see today, for the primary reason that tech has gotten so saturated.
But large-scale social media companies will be few and far between.
Creating an installed user base with over a billion people using your app is nearly impossible, which is why it makes an entity like $SNAP so valuable for decades to come.
I’m talking about a trillion-dollar valuation at some point, regardless of the debacle of @Specs.
@Specs is a side quest. A Hail Mary.
Wall Street is overfixated on that and is missing the truly valuable part of the business, which is the app.
I’m confident it will hit a trillion-dollar valuation in the next 30 years.
That’s 100× its current value.
Want to expand further into my thinking here.
A decade from now, the most valuable asset will be users’ attention and time.
There will be an abundance of advanced chips, AI, and software, and there won’t be the excess demand we see today, for the primary reason that tech has gotten so saturated.
But large-scale social media companies will be few and far between.
Creating an installed user base with over a billion people using your app is nearly impossible, which is why it makes an entity like $SNAP so valuable for decades to come.
I’m talking about a trillion-dollar valuation at some point, regardless of the debacle of @Specs.
@Specs is a side quest. A Hail Mary.
Wall Street is overfixated on that and is missing the truly valuable part of the business, which is the app.
I’m confident it will hit a trillion-dollar valuation in the next 30 years.
That’s 100× its current value.
I’ll say it $SNAP should be (and will be) worth 10 times $PLTR
They have a billion more consumers and nearly double the revenue of $PLTR
A decade from now the most valuable asset will be consumer eyeballs and time
come back to this tweet….
I’ll say it $SNAP should be (and will be) worth 10 times $PLTR
They have a billion more consumers and nearly double the revenue of $PLTR
A decade from now the most valuable asset will be consumer eyeballs and time
come back to this tweet….
I’ll say it $SNAP should be (and will be) worth 10 times $PLTR
They have a billion more consumers and nearly double the revenue of $PLTR
A decade from now the most valuable asset will be consumer eyeballs and time
come back to this tweet….