@TallisFinch Turtleboy is SCUM and everyone from MA, pre-Karen Read craziness, knows it. He was also charged with assault and battery from an ex so he’s one to talk.
I’m living in a simulation. That’s the only explanation. Some people are more pissed at a juror who had previous charges dropped, than they are over a woman who murdered her children. You are effed up if this is your view.
@brndxix There’s nothing saying they can’t once the trial is over. But they definitely made themselves look extremely biased in favor of Lindsay and her defense. They seem like they definitely want the attention, knowing how big the case is now.
@Geauxtgrs66 It’s crazy to me in this day and age, they don’t do a social media check on potential jurors. This should have gotten her disqualified from the start. And she was the foreperson, wasn’t she??
You gotta love the women saying Patrick didn’t do enough. Everybody failed Lindsay. While also saying they don’t need a man is WILDDDDDD….
Let’s get it straight. She had a village. Lindsay failed the children. Lindsay only. The babies paid for it with their lives.
Her husband should have had her forced committed. Maybe then, the kids would still be alive. But then y’all would be screaming that she is being held against her will.
Women need to pick a lane and stay in it. You can’t have it both ways.
Hypocrites.
@JohnDePetroshow The fact that these pink shirt idiots who are supposedly there for “supporting women and women’s mental health” are literally screaming terrible, derogatory things at two women just doing their fucking jobs.
It feels like I am the last female that has zero, and I mean zero sympathy for Lindsay Clancy. May she rot in hell. Please tell me there is someone else?
Somebody actually asked DA Timothy Cruz if the Clancy prosecution was "insensitive."
He had to ask again to make sure he understood the idiocy of the question before responding:
"Insensitive?? Insensitive is killing three children."
Reddington is playing super dirty in the Lindsay Clancy trial.
And more important than who is the hold-out juror, is who the juror foreperson is.
The juror foreperson is playing even dirtier than Reddington.
Another thing. Just because the jury foreperson interprets the holdout as refusing to follow the instructions doesn't mean they are. That's her take on the matter, and that alone is not enough to remove the juror. Under the law, it essentially requires absolute surety that a juror is refusing to follow instructions to remove them. He or she would basically need to admit it to the judge.
Outing that the holdout juror is a man and there’s only 3 men on the jury is absolutely juror intimidation by Reddington. How is this okay? #LindsayClancy