LittlePepperBall

[🦋Josephine the reforming @countrydancer99]

@thedocespo Incredible this needs to be addressed @SECPaulSAtkins 🚨🚨
What was so important for the commissionners of the @SECGov to have 13 000 pages talking about MMTLP?
Major red flag isn’t it? 🚩

[Chad Wahlquist @chadwahl]

“Nearly 900 lives have been saved at Tampa General Hospital in Florida in the four years since it introduced the “game-changing” Sepsis Hub system, developed in partnership with Palantir.”

[Stephanie 🇬🇧🇺🇸🦍 @stephmase22]

📣📣SEC ADMITTING LACK OF TRUE TRANSPARENCY 🙉🙈🙊

Why has this been allowed to go on for so long when it's clear they were aware the system lacked true TRANSPARENCY ❓️

Now the question is what are you going to do now you can't use the excuse we couldn't see what was going on 🤔

OPAQUE MARKETS ARE CORRUPT MARKETS‼️

[LittlePepperBall @foenander]

MMTLP

[einfachman @_einfachman_]

"At the end of this, if this ends the way that I think it does, which is very favorably for us, it will be well worth the time spent,"-Kurtis.

After 3 years, to hear that come from Kurtis means a lot. I highly value every member of the MMTLP community that has fought and is fighting relentlessly for a resolution. #MMTLP #MMTLPARMY

[LittlePepperBall @foenander]

MMTLP

[zing @zing_leo12693]

@SECPaulSAtkins @SECGov

MMTLP HUGE ADMISSION!!!

Today’s Joint Data Standards rule is the SEC admitting the old system had no common identifiers, no interoperable data, and no real machine-readable transparency.

This is exactly why 65,000+ MMTLP shareholders got stonewalled for 3.5+ years.

Our hundreds of documented FOIA denials, improper closures, and patterns of obstruction directly validate the inability and noncompliance the SEC is now admitting to.

We were victims of the broken framework you’re fixing. Our records prove it.

#MMTLP @JDVance @FoxBusiness @annvandersteel @JasonLeopold

[zing @zing_leo12693]

@SECPaulSAtkins @SECGov

MMTLP HUGE ADMISSION!!!

Today’s Joint Data Standards rule is the SEC admitting the old system had no common identifiers, no interoperable data, and no real machine-readable transparency.

This is exactly why 65,000+ MMTLP shareholders got stonewalled for 3.5+ years.

Our hundreds of documented FOIA denials, improper closures, and patterns of obstruction directly validate the inability and noncompliance the SEC is now admitting to.

We were victims of the broken framework you’re fixing. Our records prove it.

#MMTLP @JDVance @FoxBusiness @annvandersteel @JasonLeopold

[einfachman @_einfachman_]

"At the end of this, if this ends the way that I think it does, which is very favorably for us, it will be well worth the time spent,"-Kurtis.

After 3 years, to hear that come from Kurtis means a lot. I highly value every member of the MMTLP community that has fought and is fighting relentlessly for a resolution. #MMTLP #MMTLPARMY

[Crazy Vibes @CrazyVibes_1]

November 1971. Chiswick, West London.
Erin Pizzey is 32 years old. She is not a lawyer. Not a politician. Not a doctor.
She is a woman who talked Hounslow Council into lending her a cold, rundown building on Belmont Road — a former community hall — for almost nothing. Her original plan was modest. A warm room. A cup of tea. Somewhere for mothers with young children to simply get out of the house.
Then the door opened.
A woman stood in the entrance. She was covered, head to foot, in bruises. She was holding two small children. She was shaking.
She didn't want tea.
She needed somewhere to hide.
Erin let her in. She didn't turn her away. She didn't tell her to call the police.
Because Erin had already called the police. They told her the same thing they told every woman in Britain at the time: they could not enter a private home over a "domestic dispute." That was the law. The home was private. What happened inside it was a family matter.
When Erin contacted a female civil servant to report what she was seeing, the response was astonishing. The woman told her flatly: "There wasn't a problem of battered wives until you made one."
Erin put down the phone. Then she went back to her residents and made sure they were fed.
Within weeks, 40 mothers and children were sleeping in four tiny rooms. No funding. No staff. No legal authority.
She didn't stop.
By 1973, word had spread through quiet whisper networks — one woman telling another, "There is a place. Go to Chiswick. She won't turn you away." That same year, Erin hosted the first National Women's Aid Conference in the UK. Women from across Britain arrived, and they all recognized the same thing at once: what she had built needed to exist everywhere.
In 1974, the council set a maximum of 36 residents. At peak times, 150 women and children were living inside those walls — sleeping on floors, on chairs, in hallways. The building smelled of cooking, fear, and something else entirely: relief.
Erin was taken to court for overcrowding. She appealed all the way to the House of Lords.
She kept the doors open the entire time.
That same year, she wrote a book. Scream Quietly or the Neighbours Will Hear. It was the first published account of domestic violence in British history. It used real stories from real women inside the shelter. Overnight, a problem that had no official name was on front pages from London to New York.
The movement spread. Refuges opened across the UK. Then Australia. Then Canada. Then the United States. The pattern she created in four small rooms in West London — no blueprint, no permission, no funding — had been replicated in hundreds of shelters across the Western world.
MP Jack Ashley stood up in Parliament and said: "It was she who first identified the problem, who first recognised the seriousness of the situation and who first did something practical."
She was ranked 14th in a poll of the 100 women who shook the world. She was awarded the Italian Peace Prize. She received a CBE. The charity she founded — Chiswick Women's Aid, which became Refuge — grew into the largest domestic violence charity in the United Kingdom, with over 460 employees and an annual income of more than £33 million.
Erin Pizzey passed away on October 4, 2025, aged 86.
She never stopped.
It all began with one woman, one borrowed building, and an absolute refusal to say no.
Forty women and children showed up with nowhere to go.
She made room.

Share this if you believe one ordinary person, refusing to look away, can build a shelter that holds the whole world.

Follow us Lost in Yesterday

[Chris G @808CG1]

MMTLP NBH MMAT #SECfraud #FOIAdenials #FINRAfraud

HOT OFF THE PRESS! - Really?

The SEC’s new Joint Data Standards rule quietly confirms what MMTLP investors already knew:

• Regulators lacked interoperable data
• Agencies weren’t aligned
• Machine‑readable oversight didn’t exist
• Investors had no access to consistent info

This rule is a fix — but also an admission. MMTLP happened in a system built before transparency.

Okay. Now what? The World is round? You still have a problem with MMTLP!

@annvandersteel @cvpayne @SECPaulSAtkins @TheRobbCarter

https://t.co/jm7Wag5jQZ

[Senator Cynthia Lummis @SenLummis]

I did not spend years on this issue to watch another country write the rules that govern the assets Americans invented. Let’s pass the Clarity Act.

[Mike @MikeLongTerm]

$PLTR shareholders looking at @PalantirTech winning in UK despite nearly a decade of nonstop attacks from Soro-funded politicians and woke campaigns. Because "Zero to One"/best software wins, eventually!

[Steve @Kestrel0160]

❌ FINRA Lost the Big One: TRF Data

THIS was the MOST BURDENSOME request (25 MILLION items!!!
- FINRA claimed it would take weeks/months and cost hundreds of thousands

Judge said: "Produce it anyway, trustee will pay" 😂🤣 This is what FINRA REALLY cared about.
MMTLP

[Buitengebieden @buitengebieden]

What would you name this dog? 😅

[Chris G @808CG1]

MMTLP #NBH #FOIAdenials #SECfraud

Another day, another step forward in exposing the #MMTLPfiasco manufactured by FINRA and the SEC.

Today I received an Appeal response that included a new batch of documents from a shareholder who chose to remain anonymous. Appreciate your hard work on this FOIA.

The result: 91 additional Congressional & SEC letters tied to MMTLP. All PDFs will be added to the dashboard for full transparency.

The contents of these letters and responses were efforts of shareholders and Members of Congress asking for answers about MMTLP and the U3 halt. Amazing effort!

To everyone pushing for truth and accountability — thank you. Stay locked in.

Focus...

[LittlePepperBall @foenander]

MMAT MMTLP NBH TRCH 💪

[Chris G @808CG1]

MMTLP #NBH #FOIAdenials #SECfraud

Another day, another step forward in exposing the #MMTLPfiasco manufactured by FINRA and the SEC.

Today I received an Appeal response that included a new batch of documents from a shareholder who chose to remain anonymous. Appreciate your hard work on this FOIA.

The result: 91 additional Congressional & SEC letters tied to MMTLP. All PDFs will be added to the dashboard for full transparency.

The contents of these letters and responses were efforts of shareholders and Members of Congress asking for answers about MMTLP and the U3 halt. Amazing effort!

To everyone pushing for truth and accountability — thank you. Stay locked in.

Focus...

[zing @zing_leo12693]

MMAT MMTLP- excellent news!!

This Nasdaq loss is a solid win for the Trustee 🔥 Full discovery is moving forward we’re getting the raw trading data on MMAT/TRCH (orders, cancels, executions over years). Keep fighting for complete transparency, not a quick settlement. The data is what matters. Data = truth. 💪💪💪

[LittlePepperBall @foenander]

MMAT MMTLP NBH TRCH 💪💪💪

[zing @zing_leo12693]

MMAT MMTLP- excellent news!!

This Nasdaq loss is a solid win for the Trustee 🔥 Full discovery is moving forward we’re getting the raw trading data on MMAT/TRCH (orders, cancels, executions over years). Keep fighting for complete transparency, not a quick settlement. The data is what matters. Data = truth. 💪💪💪

[KKep @kimkep4796]

🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️

🦋 $MMAT | In re Meta Materials Inc. (Bankr. D. Nev.)
📅 Filed: May 8, 2026 🌶️
📄 Document 2769 — Stipulated Protective Order Relating to Subpoenas to FINRA

🧠 Layman’s Breakdown

This filing is actually good news for the trustee’s investigation.

In simple terms:

🚨 What just happened?

The trustee and FINRA reached an agreement on the rules for turning over sensitive information.

Translation:

FINRA is preparing to produce documents/data, but wanted strict confidentiality protections first.

This is NOT a fight over whether information can be produced.

This is more of a:

🤝 “Fine, we’ll produce it—but here are the rules.”

That’s a meaningful shift.

⸻
🎯 Why does this matter?

FINRA previously fought hard, arguing:
⚖️ burden
🔒 privilege
📁 confidentiality
🕵️ investigative protections

Now we have a signed protective order.

That usually means:

✅ Production is moving forward
✅ Logistics are being finalized
✅ The trustee is getting closer to actual evidence

⸻
📜 What is a protective order?

Think of it like a court-enforced NDA.

Sensitive material can be handed over, but:

❌ not dumped publicly
❌ not posted online
❌ not used outside this case
✅ only approved people can see it
⸻
📊 What can FINRA label confidential?

A LOT.

Examples:

📂 internal regulatory materials
🕵️ investigation-related information
📈 trading / transactional data
🏢 proprietary business info
👤 customer/member information
💰 investor/fund positions
📨 nonpublic communications

Translation:

The trustee may be getting highly sensitive market data.

⸻
🔐 Two levels of secrecy

🟡 1. CONFIDENTIAL

Can be seen by:
👩‍⚖️ trustee
⚖️ trustee’s attorneys
👥 staff helping the case
📊 retained experts
🛠 litigation consultants

⸻
🔴 2. ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY

Even tighter.

Basically limited to:

⚖️ lawyers
🧠 approved experts
🖥 support personnel

Meaning:

🚫 not broad distribution

⸻
👀 HUGE practical point: Who’s on the trustee team?

This filing specifically identifies outside counsel helping the trustee:

⚖️ Hartman & Hartman
⚖️ Christian Attar
🔥 Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
⚖️ Robison Sharp Sullivan & Brust / SBW
⚖️ Schneider Wallace

Why this matters:

Kasowitz is not your average routine bankruptcy admin firm.

That suggests:

💥 serious litigation preparation
⸻
🛡 What FINRA still protects

Important caveat:

FINRA is NOT waiving privilege.

They specifically preserve:

🔒 attorney-client privilege
📚 work product
🕵️ investigative file privilege
⚖️ other legal protections

Translation:

This is NOT “open the vault.”

⸻
🌐 Can shareholders see this data?

Not automatically.

If filed with court:

🔐 likely under seal
⚖️ public release would require further steps

So:

👀 shareholders probably won’t immediately see raw production.
⸻
🚀 Big strategic takeaway

This strongly suggests discovery is shifting from:

❌ “Should FINRA produce?”

to

✅ “How do we handle what FINRA produces?”

That’s a meaningful procedural win.

The real question now:

🤔 What’s in the data?

⸻
🦋 Quick Summary

FINRA and the trustee just agreed on confidentiality rules for subpoenaed materials. That usually means production is moving forward. Sensitive market/regulatory data may be coming in, heavyweight litigation counsel is clearly involved, but much of the evidence may remain sealed unless used later in litigation.

⚠️ Not legal advice

https://t.co/lRm1xi9kUw

[LittlePepperBall @foenander]

MMAT MMTLP NBH TRCH

[KKep @kimkep4796]

🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️

🦋 $MMAT | In re Meta Materials Inc. (Bankr. D. Nev.)
📅 Filed: May 8, 2026 🌶️
📄 Document 2769 — Stipulated Protective Order Relating to Subpoenas to FINRA

🧠 Layman’s Breakdown

This filing is actually good news for the trustee’s investigation.

In simple terms:

🚨 What just happened?

The trustee and FINRA reached an agreement on the rules for turning over sensitive information.

Translation:

FINRA is preparing to produce documents/data, but wanted strict confidentiality protections first.

This is NOT a fight over whether information can be produced.

This is more of a:

🤝 “Fine, we’ll produce it—but here are the rules.”

That’s a meaningful shift.

⸻
🎯 Why does this matter?

FINRA previously fought hard, arguing:
⚖️ burden
🔒 privilege
📁 confidentiality
🕵️ investigative protections

Now we have a signed protective order.

That usually means:

✅ Production is moving forward
✅ Logistics are being finalized
✅ The trustee is getting closer to actual evidence

⸻
📜 What is a protective order?

Think of it like a court-enforced NDA.

Sensitive material can be handed over, but:

❌ not dumped publicly
❌ not posted online
❌ not used outside this case
✅ only approved people can see it
⸻
📊 What can FINRA label confidential?

A LOT.

Examples:

📂 internal regulatory materials
🕵️ investigation-related information
📈 trading / transactional data
🏢 proprietary business info
👤 customer/member information
💰 investor/fund positions
📨 nonpublic communications

Translation:

The trustee may be getting highly sensitive market data.

⸻
🔐 Two levels of secrecy

🟡 1. CONFIDENTIAL

Can be seen by:
👩‍⚖️ trustee
⚖️ trustee’s attorneys
👥 staff helping the case
📊 retained experts
🛠 litigation consultants

⸻
🔴 2. ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY

Even tighter.

Basically limited to:

⚖️ lawyers
🧠 approved experts
🖥 support personnel

Meaning:

🚫 not broad distribution

⸻
👀 HUGE practical point: Who’s on the trustee team?

This filing specifically identifies outside counsel helping the trustee:

⚖️ Hartman & Hartman
⚖️ Christian Attar
🔥 Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
⚖️ Robison Sharp Sullivan & Brust / SBW
⚖️ Schneider Wallace

Why this matters:

Kasowitz is not your average routine bankruptcy admin firm.

That suggests:

💥 serious litigation preparation
⸻
🛡 What FINRA still protects

Important caveat:

FINRA is NOT waiving privilege.

They specifically preserve:

🔒 attorney-client privilege
📚 work product
🕵️ investigative file privilege
⚖️ other legal protections

Translation:

This is NOT “open the vault.”

⸻
🌐 Can shareholders see this data?

Not automatically.

If filed with court:

🔐 likely under seal
⚖️ public release would require further steps

So:

👀 shareholders probably won’t immediately see raw production.
⸻
🚀 Big strategic takeaway

This strongly suggests discovery is shifting from:

❌ “Should FINRA produce?”

to

✅ “How do we handle what FINRA produces?”

That’s a meaningful procedural win.

The real question now:

🤔 What’s in the data?

⸻
🦋 Quick Summary

FINRA and the trustee just agreed on confidentiality rules for subpoenaed materials. That usually means production is moving forward. Sensitive market/regulatory data may be coming in, heavyweight litigation counsel is clearly involved, but much of the evidence may remain sealed unless used later in litigation.

⚠️ Not legal advice

https://t.co/lRm1xi9kUw

[Love Beyond Color @LoveBeyondCo1or]

White people have been fighting for black people since slavery, and they gave their lives to end slavery when they didn’t even start it. The least I can do is fight for them too. We have to End Racism Against White People Too.
Love Beyond Color