🚨RFK Jr. calls out Bernie Sanders direct to his face! 🔥
"Bernie, you have accepted millions of dollars from the Pharmaceutical industry. In 2020 you were the single largest receiver of Pharmaceutical dollars. $1.5M"
The crowd erupts in applause! LFG!!
https://t.co/ylQezDqyyY
I fought @GaryGensler’s @SECGov on behalf of 75K XRP token holders, including 627 here in MA. I did it all pro bono and spent $75,000 of my own money prosecuting the case. Every time I believed the SEC couldn’t degrade itself any further, the lawyers at the SEC proved me wrong. A lifelong Democrat Judge, appointed by @BarackObama, agreed with me and relied on some of the evidence and briefing that I provided to the court. The judge clearly ruled XRP itself is NOT a security - just as I and others said she would.
During the case, the lawyers at the SEC were found by a federal judge to “lack faithful allegiance to the law.” She also called them a bunch of hypocrites who would say anything just to win an argument.
After that case, the SEC was found by an appellate court to have acted arbitrary and capricious - one of the hardest legal standards to meet.
Finally, in the Debt Box case, the SEC was sanctioned by a federal judge for intentionally lying to the court, as well as committing other misconduct.
The SEC is now👇 ignoring reality, as well as s court ruling, to continue its unethical behavior.
Where’s the outrage from Senators sitting on the Banking Committee overseeing the SEC?
Where is @SenWarren? Wait, I forgot, she doesn’t want to place @GaryGensler “in a tough spot” (her words) despite that being the precise thing she’s supposed to do. But she is good at telling Gensler what to say under oath. 👇
As a Special Assistant United States Attorney, I prosecuted a case of suborning perjury with much less evidence than this.
@MattWallace888 ABC News: ‘There is no evidence of migrants eating pets’
YouTuber: ‘Here’s 30 minutes of firsthand accounts of residents in Springfield Ohio where many who live there say the pets are disappearing’
ABC News: ‘Let’s talk about climate change…’
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
This is not “bias."
It’s much worse.
This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.
When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.
The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.
In this clip:
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.
7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
"They did exactly what their bosses wanted."
Trump's most pro-business policy was his aggressive rollback of regulations.
In his first three years, he reversed 20 years' worth of regulations in the federal register, an unprecedented achievement.
He signed an executive order requiring removing two regulations for every new one introduced.
This progress was reversed during COVID-19 and the Biden-Harris administration.
During Trump's first three years, median household income rose by 10% (about $7,700), compared to just 1% (around $1,050) under Biden-Harris.
Real household net worth grew by only 0.7% during Biden's first three years, compared to a 16% increase under Trump.
Under Biden-Harris, Americans earn and save less while costs keep rising.
Trump's proposal for @elonmusk to lead a commission on deregulation and cutting wasteful government spending would transform the economy and unleash unprecedented growth, benefiting all Americans.
Biden 2022: "We won't send long-range missiles to Ukraine because we don't want to start a war with Russia."
Biden 2023: "We're sending long-range missiles to Ukraine."
Biden 2024: "We're allowing Ukraine to use American long-range missiles to strike Russia."
What happened to not wanting to start a war with Russia?
The death last year of a 14-year-old Irish teen 3 weeks after he received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has sparked a “considerable investigation” that will include requests to Pfizer for safety information.
https://t.co/CqynlCBFYq