@glosterpatriot@AlekYerbury I decided to ask the question partly because abortion policy was raised, but also because Demand 1 of the NRP manifesto, with its citizenship limits, implies that strong pro-natalist policies should also be in place to help improve the native birth rate
What is required in Britain is national, rather than international, solidarity with an economy free from the overwhelming burden of usury-based finance. We should honour the farmer and worker as the Third Reich did
@Angloxander I know I mentioned that I appreciate a good edit, but as someone who is middle-aged I’m afraid the swastika flag propaganda is rather ineffective on me 😂
Thanks for citing those, it took me a minute to get my thoughts together as it’s rather late in the evening.
Demands 1 to 4 and 18 do support the national rather than international point, so that part is fair.
On the usury and economy claim, Demand 17 talks about ending endless debt accumulation and making the elimination of debt and prevention of inflation the main fiscal goals. It also wants stronger state scrutiny of banking. Demand 14 supports private enterprise guided by national goals and Demand 16 nationalises utilities along with transport.
None of them mention usury or interest, and together they don’t amount to a fully nationalised economy free from usury based finance.
On honouring the worker, Demand 15 and Demand 6 do stress the value of productive work and put the state in charge of protecting the worker. But there is still zero mention of farmers, farming or agriculture anywhere in the document, so that part of the original statement isn’t covered. Although you have implied their inclusion under the blanket of workers so maybe an update is required to the relevant Demands to reflect that.
Overall it overlaps on national solidarity and valuing productive work, but it doesn’t fully match the points about usury or currently farmers specifically. I was raised in a farming community so supporting farmers is of particular interest to me, therefore I’d be interested to see any agricultural policy the NRP could provide in future. I also have some further questions related to Demand 1 but those are hopefully being addressed in a different thread
@glosterpatriot@AlekYerbury I seem to have inadvertently started a mini policy debate 😅. Aside from the abortion question, what are both your parties’ goals for encouraging family formation, motherhood, and population growth through native births?
I do appreciate a good edit. Saying that though, I do prefer Hitler. I see remigration came up during it, and this may not be an official party production, but are you planning to make that policy? I asked the @natdisparty the same question earlier on their own remigration-related post so it would be interesting to compare stances
I do apologise for my delayed response. X flagged your comment as probable spam.
As suggested I’ve gone through the NRP’s Twenty Demands and there’s some overlap with the points I raised, particularly on national solidarity over internationalism and the value of productive work.
That said, the manifesto doesn’t actually cover everything. There’s no policy at all on farmers or agriculture, and while Demand 17 talks about ending debt accumulation and controlling inflation, it never mentions usury or interest. So it lines up in places, but not fully. Granted, I did only skim the document and may have missed something pertinent
I’ve finally found some time to listen to this podcast. It’s hosted by two very interesting and engaging ladies and I heartily recommend it to the folkish-minded
Episode 1 We're Back!
Make Tradwives Great Again/
Make Crunchy Moms Radical Again
Then & Now
Herbal remedies, AI, raw milk...
Back alley herb shops, off grid living, moms vs algorithms 💪🏼
https://t.co/1PPpLFzHbV
Sounds familiar? One hundred years ago, ordinary people and farmers popularised the slogan "Germany Awake!" to oppose the globalist agenda. The mainstream media mocked them as "conspiracy theorists" and for being poor because they wore second-hand clothing: "brownshirts".
@glosterpatriot@WasAcop I’m no huge fan of Mr Fox. However, the fact they reacted in that manner without knowing the contents of the envelope proved his point without him having to be crude. It was actually rather English of him. One does not always have to sink to the level of the barbarian