Formas

[Formas @formastu]

I agree with Lee.
https://t.co/fom2s2FtJU

[Formas @formastu]

@JimJammyJimbo @NevadaLiberty64 @RadioGenoa You did the meme!

[Formas @formastu]

@Patriot_Gus @RadioGenoa Probably don't want to go to jail for self defense. Sad state of affairs.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty No lol. If that were possibly the case, the rings would go to 20, but they don't. They go to 16. It shows what it means. Which is the peak density of the assigned units, not the peak ring.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty It shows that liberals have a overall stronger concentration of moral concern units in one area than conservatives did. 20 to 12. Meaning conservatives actually distributed their units broader overall. That's not "what I think" it is what it shows.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty Easiest way to convey it to you apparently. We were talking about the heat map, and the fixed budget. It clearly states the rings reflect the amount allocated to each location, not a single highest point.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty No it's where you assigned the highest amount of your tokens.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty Nope. If the terminology was "Furthest allocation point" you would have an argument. Highest allocation is the area where you assigned the highest amount of your points.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty That makes no sense. Highest moral allocation, is the area of highest concentration of the points you were given. if you placed 99 in ring one your highest allocation would be in ring 1.

You would be allocating 99 points into ring 1.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty No lol. The concentration represents the "highest moral allocation" of the units, from the people that participated. If you only counted one data point per person, what would be the point of other units given.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty "Highest moral allocation" yes, not "highest single unit placement"

Unless of course they were only given one unit for the study, which they weren't. But it would still indicate where their moral concern lies more.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty The "highest value" is just the allocation of the end result. So if anything liberals having a 20 solidifies the result of their moral concern placement, and conservatives distributed more evenly with only their most concentrated area being 12.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty According to the study liberals clearly care more about the outer rings. Again you are just disagreeing with the study if you are disagreeing with limitations. I think the limitations represent how the real world works because you can't distribute yourself everywhere evenly.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty No. It represents the aggregate of their placement, not just where they placed their outermost unit. They were given a budget of units to place where they want. Liberals placed more further away, hence the heat map.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty The rings represent the units, which represent moral concern. If you assign 1/3 of your moral units to “all humans” and 2/3 to “immediate family,” you would land in closer the inner circle. Flip that, and you land in the outer circles.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty Exactly. Liberals care more about the outer rings than conservatives do, and conservatives care more about the inner rings than liberals do. You can't have it both ways.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty Participant given finite units can't distribute "more" just decide where they allocate them.

Also "giving a shit" is most definitely a finite resource. You can't "give a shit" about everything and accomplish anything.

So just say you disagree with the study.

[Formas @formastu]

@ABasicAlt @GeordanWithaG @uhtmcs @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty No dingus. The heat map is a visual representation of the data. The data is where the moral units where allocated.

[Formas @formastu]

@GeordanWithaG @uhtmcs @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty Extent in terms of where you distribute it, yes.

[Formas @formastu]

@uhtmcs @GeordanWithaG @ThingBeak @OzzyAussieOtty Not when the moral units were finite. Obviously when given unlimited units you can distribute at will.