🚨The Court of Appeal has dismissed the appeal of Justice Mosley’s decision, confirming once again that invoking the Emergencies Act was unconstitutional.
That is a really big deal and the Court of Appeal was unequivocal:
“We have already found that Cabinet, on the evidence that was before it and on a proper interpretation of the Act, did not have reasonable grounds to believe that a threat to national security existed.”
On the evidence, as many of us said from the beginning, the legal threshold was never met. The federal government knew, or ought to have known, that this appeal was bound to fail. Yet it proceeded anyway, consuming years of time and significant public resources, while hoping the public would simply move on.
And it bears repeating: if anything truly went sideways in Ottawa, the primary failures were local. The City of Ottawa and the Ottawa Police Service grossly mismanaged the protest from the outset, creating conditions that escalated rather, and in doing so played directly into the federal government’s political narrative.
For years, peaceful protesters were disparaged and slandered, portrayed as dangerous and treasonous. Many were beaten, arrested, and jailed.
And we should also be honest about this: what does this say about those who accepted the government’s narrative without question, who repeated claims that have now been judicially rejected, and who looked the other way while fellow citizens were vilified and punished?
Now the responsibility shifts to us.
This confirms, once again, a profound democratic failure: extraordinary powers deployed unlawfully, Charter rights infringed, and citizens met with force instead of dialogue.
Accountability does not end with this judgment. It begins with it.
If governments can misuse emergency powers, disparage their own citizens instead of engaging with them, and then attempt to run out the clock through prolonged litigation, democratic accountability survives only if the public actively enforces it.
Let’s not fall for this trap again. Let’s stop before fear, propaganda, and politics are weaponized to turn Canadians against their neighbours, friends, and families—while those in power evade scrutiny and consequence.
We deserve better. But we must demand better.
🚨Shocking Revelation from 5th Gen Cattle Rancher Braden Jensen: mRNA Vaccines Tested on Livestock!
They injected 525 hogs with a live mRNA vaccine. In just 21 days:
- 25 died outright
- 55 became anorexic & near death
- 20 suffered lameness
- 12 lost condition
- 25 more had near-death symptoms
That's 30% with severe issues! Autopsies even found vaccine remnants in the meat. As consumers, are we eating this? As producers, is this destroying our herds?
What do y'all think? How sinister is this?! Drop your thoughts, RT if this alarms you, and tag a friend! Let's spread awareness. Buy American, buy local! 🇺🇸
If taxes on fertilizer, farm equipment, and fuel weren't enough, now the Liberals are planning on amending the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Regulations on Identification and Traceability regulations this spring, adding endless red tape on farmers and ranchers across Canada.
This is all while Canadians are struggling more than ever to put food on the table.
It's time to cut the taxes and slash the red tape on those who grow, ship, and sell food so Canadians can afford to eat.
@ChanLPfa I don’t know about you, but I was born in Canada over 40 years ago. Where am I supposed to go if we “give the land back” ? I’m so confused. I’d have to become an immigrant! Maybe I could apply for government benefits 😆
the thing about calling DEI 'economic genocide' is that it undersells it
yes, young White men were systematically excluded from careers during their peak marriage years, but that's just first-order effects.
second-order: marriage market collapse. women date across and up. men without careers become invisible to the women who would have married them and disappear. the "eligible bachelor" pool shrinks.
third-order: fertility crisis. fewer marriages, fewer children. but it's worse than just men not marrying or having families. the women who "won" the DEI lottery got careers instead of families, delayed fertility until it was too late. DEI attacked family formation from both sides, excluded men from provider roles AND diverted women from their fertility window. everyone lost.
fourth-order: psychological. young men couldn't even name what was happening to them. the same institutions that excluded them told them they were "privileged", that complaining was proof of weakness. so they internalized failure as personal inadequacy rather than systemic rigging, retreated into depression, video games, porn. the symptoms we then pathologized as "male failure". the system broke them (on purpose) and blamed them for being broken.
fifth-order: institutional trust gone. once you know positions are filled by demographics rather than competence, every credential becomes suspect (if not a priori worthless). is your doctor qualified or a diversity hire? your pilot? your engineer? you can't prove any individual is incompetent, but you can't trust any individual is competent either. medicine skepticism, academic failure, media skepticism, none of this emerged organically. it was manufactured by the DEI hire you can't be sure is qualified to treat you.
sixth-order: reality became unspeakable. noticing any of this was a fireable offense. pointing out the obvious got you called a bigot, deplatformed or fired. pure totalitarian censorship and the problem couldn't even be acknowledged (until now, finally)
men knew they were being cheated but couldn't say it. women sensed something was wrong with the men but couldn't identify it. relationships poisoned by a dynamic neither party could name.
seventh-order: the feedback loop. fewer eligible men means more women competing for a shrinking pool, more women losing the marriage market, more resentment, more "men are trash", more support for DEI, fewer eligible men and the system accelerates itself.
and the worst part is that DEI was just the economic arm. the same people and institutions pushed the complete package
"toxic masculinity" to pathologize male identity
"the future is female" as explicit zero-sum framing delusion
"believe all women" to weaponize trust against men
"men are trash" to normalize open contempt
a coordinated ideological assault on family formation.
and it even had a business model. HR departments exploded (millions of jobs invented to administer the regime). DEI consultants became a multi-billion dollar industry. politicians got voting blocs dependent on racial grievance. established boomers kept their positions while their competition was eliminated.
the architects knew what they were doing
you don't accidentally build a system that specifically targets men during peak marriage years, tells them they deserve it, makes it unspeakable to complain, attacks their identity as toxic, promotes women into career tracks that burn their fertility, then acts confused when society collapses
if you wanted to suppress the fertility of a specific demographic, engineer the breakdown of trust between the sexes, and make it illegal to notice, the playbook would look exactly like this.
DEI should be held responsible for the fertility crisis, the marriage collapse, the epidemic of male depression and suicide, the destruction of institutional trust, the atomization of society, and the manufactured war between men and women
but DEI was the weapon
the people who designed it, funded it, made it mandatory, enforced it through HR, fired anyone who resisted, called all opposition hate and racism, built careers and industries on its maintenance, they knew. and they're the ones who should be remembered as the architects of one of the worst crimes against humanity
🚨BREAKING: Campbell Soup’s VP and Chief Information Security Officer, Martin Bally, was secretly recorded saying the company uses bioengineered meat, their products aren’t healthy, and that it’s mostly poor people who buy them.
"We have shit for fucking poor people. Who buys our shit? I don’t buy Campbell’s products barely anymore. It’s not healthy now that I know what the fuck‘s in it. Bioengineered meat! I don’t wanna eat a fucking piece of chicken that came from a 3-D printer."
The Campbell Soup scandal isn’t just another corporate embarrassment. It is a window into the rot that has been fermenting inside America’s food conglomerates for decades. When a top executive is caught on tape admitting that the company’s products amount to “shit for poor people,” he isn’t revealing a moment of drunken exaggeration—he’s revealing the contempt that the corporate caste has for the very public that keeps them alive.
This is what happens when monopoly power, cheap science, and moral bankruptcy collide. A vice president—one sitting at the top floor, insulated from the real world—spills out the truth in a private meeting: he doesn’t eat the products. He knows what’s in them. He knows what corners are cut. He knows what kind of engineered mystery-slurry gets passed off as nourishment in the name of shareholder value. And he knows who buys it: the people living on the margins, the families stretching every dollar, the households that still treat a can of soup as a meal.
And behind the curtain, the man admits he wouldn’t touch the stuff with a ten-foot pole.
Bioengineered meat.
Lab-designed protein blocks.
The whispered specter of 3-D printed chicken.
He speaks about it like a man confessing to a crime—because in his world, these are normal ingredients, accepted practices, cost-saving miracles. The public was never supposed to hear this. This was the private language of the corporate priesthood.
Then comes the most predictable chapter of the entire saga: the employee who reported the behavior gets fired. Retaliation masquerading as “policy enforcement.” The old corporate playbook never changes—punish the messenger, bury the scandal, polish the boilerplate “these comments do not reflect our values” statement, and hope the media cycle forgets before the next quarterly earnings call.
But this time, the comments are too grotesque, too revealing, too aligned with what millions of people already suspect about the modern American food machine. The truth slipped out: the executives don’t eat the products. They don’t trust the ingredients. They don’t respect the customers. They see the public the way an aristocrat sees the peasants—useful only as long as they keep buying the gruel.
This is not a Campbell problem alone. It is systemic. It is cultural. It is the inevitable outcome of a nation that turned its food supply into a chemical engineering contest and its citizens into unwitting test subjects.
The corporate giants build their fortunes on low-grade inputs and high-octane marketing. They hire scientists not to improve nutrition, but to enhance shelf life, reduce cost, and mimic flavor. They hire lobbyists to rewrite regulations. They hire executives who speak about the public with seething disdain behind closed doors.
And when the truth leaks out—it always leaks out—they call it an “isolated incident.”
No.
This was not an incident.
This was an accidental confession.
The real question isn’t whether Campbell’s uses bioengineered or lab-printed meat in its soups. The real question is how many other corporations do—and how many executives privately avoid the very products they push onto the population every single day.
When a VP rants that he doesn’t eat the food because he “knows what’s in it,” you’ve been given a glimpse into the American food pyramid’s darkest secret: the people designing the system do not live inside it.
And that is the scandal.
Not the vulgarity.
Not the rant.
Not the lawsuit.
But the admission that the system is so rotten that even the architects refuse to eat from their own assembly line.
Once a truth like that escapes, it cannot be stuffed back into a can.
@CursingCalendar I missed the Lloyd Craft Fair this year as I was in Calgary. Went to theirs at Spruce Meadows. I will say, it wasn’t the same as Lloydminster and I actually prefer Lloyd. Hope to catch you next year!
The Undisputable Truth! 🧵
Ever hear of Dean French? It is imperitive you do!
He was the mediator between Tamara, the Convoy, the City of Ottawa and the Trudeau Government. He explains first hand exactly how the @liberal_party acted in bad faith and broke Canadian Law!
-Share🙏
@TaraBull808 Many rides have a 48” minimum height requirement so Universal Studios may be a place where families choose to go when the kids are older so they don’t waste their time/money.
This is my livelihood, the breadwinner that has kept my family fed for years, and the crown seeks to destroy my life and future because we took a stand against tyranny. Government overreach at its finest. Our Canada under #Liberal rule!!!!! Vote smart #Canada