Caroline Forth

[Caroline Forth @ForthCaroline]

@DoctorTurtleboy These are the best days! 🏈

[Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump]

I am proud to announce that, effective immediately, I am banning Fake News CNN, MSNOW (who recently changed their name from MSNBC due to lack of viewership and credibility!), and Politico (The recipients of an illegal and ridiculous $8 Million Dollar subscription, an All Time Record, directly from the United States Government, under Crooked Joe Biden, in order to keep them “alive.” Seems like corruption to me!), from the White House as a result of their constant “reporting” FAKE NEWS! Media Outlets shouldn’t be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they’re covering the President of the United States, the Trump Administration, or the United States of America. Other Fake News Media Outlets to follow. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP

[Caroline Forth @ForthCaroline]

@GlammaSooz @DoctorTurtleboy Yes Sooz! We need a freestyle 🙌🏻 🐢

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

The path of life never gets easier. The climb doesn’t get less steep. Your legs just get stronger.

Never quit.

We have communists to wreck.

[Microdots @DropMicrodots]

The shocking truth about Djuna Perkins and her supporters. Aquamarine blue has become a dogwhistle for internet depravity. Djuna bring your trash somewhere else, Norfolk County is already stocked up.

[Caroline Forth @ForthCaroline]

@ericagurl147 Well said!

[Eric Trump @EricTrump]

Give this 16-year-old lifeguard the highest civilian honor. This is truly the best of America! Well done!

[Brother Counsel @BrotherCounsel]

If @BostonGlobe wants to win back credibility after the debacle with @BostonDefender and @GretchenVoss64 I am offering to write an article for them on the Karen Read case free of charge. I have been covering the Karen Read case extensively since January 2024.

[Caroline Forth @ForthCaroline]

@BrotherCounsel @BostonDefender BC has easily become one of my top Attorneys to watch analyze all the court proceedings, motions, etc.
We live, we learn and we laugh!

[David Yannetti @BostonDefender]

Respectfully, @djunaperkins, this is a political cheap shot and beneath your dignity.

You know nothing about the federal investigation, what evidence they had, how they investigated and why they got involved.

I had never met @adamdeitch before the Read case, but I am supporting him in this race because he has displayed the ethics, judgment and experience that are necessary to be district attorney.

In an office that featured festering incompetence and poor judgment, Adam is the breath of fresh air that is necessary to establish the office’s credibility and commitment to justice.

You owe him an apology.

[Caroline Forth @ForthCaroline]

@DoctorTurtleboy @BostonDefender He doesn’t give a shit about KR! He showed his cards a long time ago.

[Caroline Forth @ForthCaroline]

@DoctorTurtleboy @BostonDefender It’s become clear to me that this is all also very political for MC. He’s pushing for Perkins not Deitch. The Voss article was political propaganda but went too far w all the blatant lies. Trying to dirty up AD’s name by smearing anyone she felt like she needed to is what I read.

[David Yannetti @BostonDefender]

A primer on unethical reporting and the priorities of certain media:

Every publication prides itself on thorough, accurate and ethical reporting. A lot of work — and a system of checks and balances— is supposed to be put into place to hopefully ensure that a publisher will NEVER have to issue a correction. If someone takes issue with an article but the publisher has an out because there was some ambiguity, a publisher will take that “out” and do anything to avoid having to publish a correction.

Issuing a correction is a black eye to the reporter, certainly. It signals to future editors that she cannot be trusted. But it is also embarrassing to the editors and the publisher, who are forced to admit that they failed at their jobs as well.

So now we come to @GretchenVoss64’s agenda-driven hit piece in @BostonMagazine. People ask why someone would not grant an interview to a reporter like her. You don’t grant someone like that an interview because you would be giving an untrustworthy person control over your words. She’s not seeking the truth, she’s advancing her own narrative, irrespective of (and often contrary to) the truth. And given her lack of ethics, she will take a quote from you and publish it out of context to make it appear as though you said something that you didn’t. To try to make you look bad to advance her agenda.

As an aside, those dangers are exactly why any criminal defense attorney will advise a client never to speak to the police.

I chose not to speak with @GretchenVoss6 because I knew her to be untrustworthy. And sure enough, she was so blinded by her own bias that she took an old quote of mine out of context and made it appear as though I said something that I didn’t. In the process, of course, she unwittingly proved what her intentions would have been had I agreed to speak with her in the first place. And by doing so, she put her magazine in legal jeopardy. Shame on her.

You can bet that when @BostonMagazine received my demand for a correction, they panicked. They consulted with their legal department, who advised them that there was no “out.” They recognized that it was one of the strongest defamation claims that could exist, because @GretchenVoss64 acted with actual malice and there was zero defense to what she did. They were loathe to do it but they had no choice. They issued the correction and hoped that would put the issue to bed.

I’m told, however, that the print edition still exists. I haven’t decided yet whether to take any further action regarding that clear defamation. In addition, there are many other inaccuracies in her “article” (although I will likely leave it to others to demand those corrections). For now, it is just satisfying — once again — to have exposed corruption.

[Bederow Law @Bederowlaw]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Yesterday we were notified about an Atlantic County, New Jersey indictment of Aidan Kearney @DoctorTurtleboy. Although this indictment remains sealed, within hours, its existence was improperly leaked to third-parties.

This prosecution stems from the civilian complaint of a New Jersey resident who intentionally contacted Mr. Kearney, hoping that he would publicize her longterm humiliation of a Massachusetts citizen who was the brother of John O'Keefe, the victim in the high-profile Massachusetts prosecution of Karen Read. The complainant contacted Mr. Kearney to generate online attention, hoping this would grant her access to people close to the Read case. Mr. Kearney has never met this woman and he has not stepped foot in New Jersey in years.

The Atlantic County Prosecutor's decision to present this matter to a grand jury is both disappointing and virtually unprecedented. It is clear that the Prosecutor has serious doubts about the merits of the case and the credibility of the evidence. The indictment follows the complainant's voluntary withdrawal of a civil proceeding she brought against Mr. Kearney. She chose to terminate that proceeding rather than be subjected to cross examination, after a respected Superior Court judge entered critical rulings in favor of Mr. Kearney's right to free speech. After the civil matter concluded in Mr. Kearney's favor, the Prosecutor sat on this civilian complaint for seven months.

On July 7, 2026, the assigned prosecutor advised us that she had determined this matter would NOT be presented to a grand jury and a decision was forthcoming about whether the civilian complaint would be dismissed or remanded to the municipal court. Within minutes of this update, the assigned prosecutor reversed course, now informing us that she had been directed to immediately present the matter to the grand jury. She then declined our request to meet with Atlantic County Prosecutor William Reynolds. She further declined our request that Mr. Kearney be afforded the opportunity to testify as a witness before the grand jury.

No citizen should be indicted for speaking freely and expressing his or her opinion about matters of public concern. A grand jury is entirely controlled by a prosecutor. It is a one-sided presentation with a low burden of proof. We are confident that when all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Mr. Kearney's indictment are revealed it will be apparent to any reasonable person that his speech which serves as the basis for this indictment is protected by the First Amendment and New Jersey law, and that he has not violated New Jersey's cyber harassment statute.

Attorneys for Aidan Kearney

Mark Bederow
Linda Kenney Baden
Darren Gelber @dgelber

[Caroline Forth @ForthCaroline]

@Table327

[Aidan Kearney @DoctorTurtleboy]

Now the judge is saying I broke the spirit impoundment order with my June 25 tweet about proctor having a panic attack. I got this information from a source. The same source also saw Brian Higgins and Brian Tully in the same building this week being deposed.

[Caroline Forth @ForthCaroline]

@lau_617_ @caitboogie Setting up your acct to only show when certain accts post & then only looking at those has been the best way to stay on here and not see all the insanity. It took a bit but worth it. If I start scrolling & start seeing the weird accts thats when I shut it down. Protect ur peace🫶🏻

[Marc J. Randazza 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 🇧🇷 @marcorandazza]

We bombed them into the stone age and they love America more than Massachusetts does.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

Pacific Palisades - 18 months after the fire.

Don't let communists run your city.