T. Rymann

EEEEVERYOOONE KNOWS I’M IN OVER MY HEAD OVER MY HEEEADDD

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@conceptuelx @zuki_2024 It’s just fun genre fiction but yeah I wouldn’t re-read it

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

You know the drill. Want to prove you actually take a debate seriously for once? Debate my hawks. If you can do decently against my hawks, you can earn the opportunity to debate me again.

[alexandria @Lib0fAlexandria]

Grubhub Perks Give you Deals On The Food You Love. The Kind of Deals That Make You Boogie.

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

physiognomy is real. Losers hate the idea of hierarchy bc they're at the bottom.

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

“I move money and people around all day”

[HowlingHudson @alpacaskreet]

Miss my wife, who hates me

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@MikeHoncho5ezc @xwanyex Yes, one’s opinion is not necessarily justified by “the science”lmfao

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@MikeHoncho5ezc @xwanyex No lol if you acknowledge that it’s derived from your own system of values, you just shouldn’t say that it’s justified by “the science”; whether or not morality is objective i.e. subject-independent is a separate question

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@IQWarrior67 Well ya

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

How I be Derp Chungusishly conducting myself 👇🏻

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@MikeHoncho5ezc @xwanyex 95 IQ award

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@MikeHoncho5ezc @xwanyex You said that “the science” supports a normative stance (eugenics); you don’t have explicitly utter the word “normative”.

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@MikeHoncho5ezc @xwanyex Indeed, the basic distinction between descriptive and normative claims is not “profound”, which is why you are stupid for struggling with this for 20 or so replies

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@MikeHoncho5ezc @xwanyex “The science” does not overwhelmingly support any normative claims about abortion you retarded faggot

[HowlingNewton @MikeHoncho5ezc]

@xwanyex The science also supports eugenics. Abortion is overwhelmingly eugenic.

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@MikeHoncho5ezc @xwanyex Excellent. You admit that the foundation of your views is your own value judgements rather than Heckin Science

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

He didn’t discover this and if he were alive today he would be posting on Reddit

[Math Files @Math_files]

While preparing for his U.S. citizenship exam, mathematician Kurt Gödel believed he had discovered a loophole in the U.S. Constitution.

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@MikeHoncho5ezc @xwanyex Yes that is based on a pre-existing moral framework that values certain races over others

[HowlingHudson @alpacaskreet]

2001 Bionicle Wigger Pig

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@MikeHoncho5ezc @xwanyex You said that it supports eugenics, you stupid lobotomized faggot. What is “eugenics” in practice?

[T. Rymann @fox1995langley]

@MikeHoncho5ezc @xwanyex What is this even apropos of? At no point have we ever addressed whether or not the moral claims in question are subject-dependent. The dispute was over whether empirical facts in and of themselves justify specific policy positions. Are you fucking retarded?