Here is one of the many videos I took during a human-initiated contact event (or HICE).
Multiple bright UAP making an appearance, including one on the ground wanting my attention. We know we aren't alone, we just want to show people the truth about what's out there. More videos ahead (1/3) @rosscoulthart@AlchemyAmerican@mufon@disclosureorg@RepEricBurlison #ufotwitter
#uapX
Nobody is saying every single person who attended or spoke at APEC is malicious. That is not the point.
The point is that there are serious public allegations and concerns raised by former insiders and associates involving intimidation, character assassination, foreign funding connections, alleged espionage-linked behavior, attempted harm against individuals like Aidan Shaffer, and years of documented psychological targeting and harassment surrounding certain figures connected to these circles.
You having a “good experience” at APEC does not magically erase the testimony, public statements, screenshots, conflicts, legal disputes, or accusations raised by people who were much deeper inside the ecosystem than you were.
Amy Eskridge publicly expressed fear and distress regarding people around her. Bernard Konkin publicly raised concerns after allegedly being pushed out and smeared. Multiple people have described patterns of manipulation, narrative control, and suppression once they became inconvenient.
And instead of these concerns being transparently addressed, what do we constantly see?
Mockery. Blocking. Smears. “They’re mentally ill.” “They’re grifters.” “Conspiracy theorists.” Endless character assassination.
The lying is incredible at this point.
Yesterday she claimed to have never so much as heard Jeremy's name. Today she admits to a hour long beach walk with him a year ago.
I realised quickly yesterday, that there is no reasoning with Jenny. I told her that she cannot be engaged with productivly for that very reason. To which she went on a spam rampage on my posts, and made multiple personal attacks and allegations against me.
I did not sling insults at her, I tried to be reasonable, I tried to inform her that she unnessescarily inserted herself into an exchange to call 'bullshit' as she put it, on words Mark himself does not deny saying because the screenshots of him doing so are everywhere.
Her conclusion, was that 'she woke up to some blonde woman on the internet yelling at her for being nice to APEC'. That is so outside of the reality of what happened, it almost causes concern.
The scale of circular logic, contradiction, deflection and outright lying from this women is so painfully transparent, that to expend any further energy on dealing with her nonsense, is a waste.
He shared the attached image with me from an encounter with what he described as an almost godlike being that wielded a device that was seemingly manipulating the time and reality around it.
In September of last year, in a conversation on Signal, Michael Battista from Skywatcher described events to me in which he, and others witnessed and documented multiple craft landings, and the subsequent interactions with non-human entities that arose from those landings.
@karenmitchell__ It’s always DARVO with them. @FalconSpaceLabs@altpropulsion
And they’re the ones in the scientific alt propulsion research community, running a whole intelligence op.
You should see the individuals he works/associates with! Birds of a feather!
@UAPLuigi@QualiaQuanta Look at all of her vile responses, immediately hopping aboard the “lets slander and character assassinate Amy Eskridge and others!” train. It’s sick. They all show their true colors though.
Then this isn’t about public disagreement anymore. There’s a difference between arguing with someone on X and obtaining their private email through a third party to continue the conflict.
If Sarfatti gave Jenny Franc’s email, then used to troll, harass, or provoke him, then this no longer is “scientific discourse” this is personal targeting.
.@JackSarfatti@JSarfatti , this doesn’t add up.
Three days ago you said you had no professional association with Mark Sokol or Jeremy Rys. Yet you’ve acknowledged meeting with them through Tim Ventura, and there are public photos and appearances placing you in the same circle. Then there’s the Christmas stream you did with @JeremyRys2@HoverBrothers .
So which is it?
Instead of attacking critics, why not explain the timeline clearly?
When did you first meet them?
How often did you interact with them?
What exactly was your relationship with Tim Ventura, Mark Sokol, and Jeremy Rys?
I’m calling out narcissist/psychopath “experts” who are misleading humanity…
This is an obvious case of dangerous manipulation of our perspective.
Professor Sam Vaknin @narcissismwithvaknin is a self-confessed narcissist who has milked the “narcissism market” through his books, lectures & podcasts.
Vaknin refers to narcissists like this:
“50 Shades of grief”
“Constant abuse”
“Constant belittling, & denigrating & degrading & shaming”
“Threatens & blackmails”
“Ruthlessness”
“Lack of empathy”
Look how he becomes a victim though when he is challenged/exposed.
This is a textbook case of a dangerous narcissist/psychopath faking being a poor, sad, at-risk, victim.
Narcissists don’t target people randomly.
They systematically target and smear campaign the people who see thru them most clearly.
The ones with strong intuition, pattern recognition, and the ones who don’t tolerate dishonesty are the biggest threat to a malignant narcissist.
The more messages and accounts that surface from people inside this Falcon Space / APEC circle, the more obvious it becomes that this was anything but a safe or stable work environment.
People describing emotional abuse. Extreme work hours. Stimulant use. Psychological breakdowns. Fear. Isolation. Serious interpersonal allegations. Escalating paranoia and conflict.
This does not look like a healthy scientific environment. It looks like a socially and psychologically volatile ecosystem built around secrecy, pressure, and unstable personalities.
And now after multiple deaths connected to the same small circle, people are expected to just accept one clean narrative without asking questions?
Everyone here in the UFO community has the ability to make the decision of whether to stand up against the inhuman abuse conducted by individuals who hold platforms and influence, yet actively misguide and divide us rather than lead with truth, integrity, and moral courage.
We do not need more division, ego, manipulation, or exploitation disguised as leadership. We need honesty. We need accountability. We need people willing to stand on principle, even when it is uncomfortable.
The future of this community REALLY depends on the choices we- YOU— make now. NO complacency!
@QualiaQuanta@fratersolis The documented harassment, threats, symptoms, and incidents Amy herself recorded deserve investigation, not ridicule. If your argument relies more on insults than evidence, you’re defending a narrative, not establishing facts.
@QualiaQuanta@fratersolis If the claim is that her work was insignificant, that should be argued on its merits, not by appealing to personal conversations, attacking Frank Milburn, or speculating about her mental state. Evidence should matter more than personalities.
@QualiaQuanta@fratersolis Amy’s publicly documented work focused on gravity modification and advanced propulsion concepts, not mainstream academic quantum gravity research.