Freeman Freedom

Biafra freedom fighter am here to see that Biafra is free

6 days ago

Those stuck in Nigeria need to know how the Narrative War works. For example, the horrific, violent, tyrannical slaughter of innocent protesters in the End SARS campaign is no doubt deeply meaningful, and should be a glaring indictment of this evil regime. So, many ask, why doesn't the world care? Several reasons: - Seriously, probably 990 of 1000 Americans can't even find Nigeria on a map. They have no engagement or understanding whatsoever. No social media algorithm will put Nigeria content in their feed. - News media don't cover Africa much at all. Any coverage is very rare, and usually trauma porn from some massacre somewhere. - To the rest of the world, SARS was a strain of bird flu. Anyone who heard of an "End SARS" protest would seriously think it was about fighting a pandemic. Seriously, nobody outside of Nigeria knows was was done or why or by whom. Nobody. I know this is disappointing, but it is what it is. Add in the fact your government spends millions of dollars on lobbyists and spin doctors -- has a whole ministry of information headed by a career PR hack -- for the whole purpose of projecting a false, rosy image of Nigeria and you must realize: You need get much better at fighting the Narrative War if you are to raise the global awareness you need to bring real change. #EarthShaker

520

331

Who to follow

Aduaka Chinedu

@aduaka_chinedu

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted

Biafra War Room @USBiafraFirst

6 days ago

Amazing Biafra, One for all and all for one, together we STAND. We have talk enough, now action is needed

186

Freeman Freedom @FreemanFreedom9

7 days ago

@AloyEjimakor https://t.co/cLxZY2ykTW

Freeman Freedom @FreemanFreedom9

7 days ago

I keep hearing the same plea: When will the United States or Britain recognize Biafra? When will they sanction Tinubu? When will they free Mazi Nnamdi Kanu? The honest answer, from a man who has been inside the rooms where these decisions are made: they will not. Not now. Not without a fight you have not yet started. Here is the truth, based on deep knowledge of the system and the historical record of every liberation movement in the modern world: no begging, no court filing, no friendly politician, and no lobbying campaign will gain you anything at all if there is not a global awakening behind it. Without that awakening, every dollar spent on advocacy and every hour spent on social media tagging members of Congress is wasted. This is not defeatism. This is realism. The work matters. But it only matters when the foundation underneath it exists. READ THE FULL POST>> https://t.co/iDMyJGXwox

MikeArnoldTruth's tweet photo. I keep hearing the same plea: When will the United States or Britain recognize Biafra? When will they sanction Tinubu? When will they free Mazi Nnamdi Kanu?

The honest answer, from a man who has been inside the rooms where these decisions are made: they will not. Not now. Not without a fight you have not yet started.

Here is the truth, based on deep knowledge of the system and the historical record of every liberation movement in the modern world: no begging, no court filing, no friendly politician, and no lobbying campaign will gain you anything at all if there is not a global awakening behind it. Without that awakening, every dollar spent on advocacy and every hour spent on social media tagging members of Congress is wasted.

This is not defeatism. This is realism. The work matters. But it only matters when the foundation underneath it exists.

READ THE FULL POST>> https://t.co/iDMyJGXwox

460

7 days ago

RT @MikeArnoldTruth: I keep hearing the same plea: When will the United States or Britain recognize Biafra? When will they sanction Tinubu?…

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted

Biafra War Room @USBiafraFirst

8 days ago

Fulani Terr0rist display heads of the military men beheaðeð on Friday. Hope southeast youths is watching the only invitation Nigeria Terr0rist Government give them to join the army with impunity. https://t.co/i9BAEK0bb2

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted

Biafra War Room @USBiafraFirst

10 days ago

WE HAVE EVERY EVIDENCE OF WHAT WE SAY Have we not told you that government is the one supporting and supplying the Fulani killer terror!st with weapons.

288

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted

10 days ago

You see, it's taqiyya when they claim there's no "caliphate" in Sokoto. The British only stopped the formal, centralized military function (since decentralized), and re-branded it a Sultanate. But from the Islamic view, they changed nothing. Their army is even bigger now. The data boys and spin doctors play it down. But when you poke them a little, they own up to it. Sokoto is a Caliphate, headed by a Caliph. (I pointed this out and he deleted it. Not fast enough!)

MikeArnoldTruth's tweet photo. You see, it's taqiyya when they claim there's no "caliphate" in Sokoto. The British only stopped the formal, centralized military function (since decentralized), and re-branded it a Sultanate. But from the Islamic view, they changed nothing. Their army is even bigger now. The data boys and spin doctors play it down. But when you poke them a little, they own up to it. Sokoto is a Caliphate, headed by a Caliph. (I pointed this out and he deleted it. Not fast enough!)

397

230

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted

10 days ago

The Sokoto Caliphate as the Largest Single-Entity Enslaver of Free Black Africans in Recorded History A Brief for Skeptics Summary of the Claim Over the course of its 222-year operational history (1804–present), the Sokoto Caliphate has captured and enslaved more free Black Africans than any other entity in recorded history. Conservative cumulative estimate: approximately 10 million people. Higher-end estimates: 12-15 million. The institution remains operative in 2026 through its successor armed networks — Boko Haram, ISWAP, the Fulani militias, Lakurawa, Ansaru, and others operating under its theological and political framework. A critical clarification at the outset: the trans-Atlantic slave trade was not an enslaver. It was a buyer's market. European ships at coastal forts in Lagos, Ouidah, Elmina, Bonny, and Calabar purchased people who had already been enslaved by African polities. The actual capturing of free Africans was always done by African enslaving entities. Among those — among the actual enslavers — the Sokoto Caliphate is the largest in recorded history. This brief lays out the documentary basis for the claim, addresses common objections, and provides comparative context. The Foundational Numbers Peak enslaved population (snapshot, late 19th century): Approximately 2 million people, representing roughly 50 percent of the Caliphate's total population. The dominant scholarly authority on this figure is Paul E. Lovejoy, whose Transformations in Slavery: A History of Slavery in Africa (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. 2000; 3rd ed. 2011) remains the standard reference. Lovejoy ranks the Sokoto Caliphate as one of the largest slave societies in modern history by peak holding — comparable in scale to the American South. The 50 percent proportion is itself a superlative. The American South at its peak (1860) held approximately 32 percent of its Deep South population in slavery. Brazil's peak proportion was lower. No major slave society in modern recorded history is documented to have held a higher proportion of its own population in chattel slavery than the Sokoto Caliphate. From Snapshot to Cumulative Total The 2 million peak figure is a holding at one moment. Cumulative slave-taking across the Caliphate's operational history is substantially larger, because: Mortality. Plantation conditions in Sokoto's gandu and rinji estates produced documented high mortality rates. Lovejoy, Transformations, ch. 6, addresses this. Replacement captures were continuous. Trans-Saharan export. Annual exports of 3,000 to 6,000 captives per year, sustained over approximately a century, yield 300,000 to 600,000 people exported north to North African, Ottoman, and Arabian markets. See Ralph A. Austen, African Economic History: Internal Development and External Dependency (Heinemann, 1987), and Austen, Trans-Saharan Africa in World History (Oxford, 2010). Continuous raiding. The Caliphate's slave economy ran on annual raiding expeditions into surrounding non-Muslim communities. Each year of operation produced fresh captures to maintain plantation labor and export streams. Operational duration. 99 years before British conquest (1804-1903), plus 123 years of operationally continuous successor activity through emirate structures, Boko Haram, ISWAP, Ansaru, the Fulani militias, Lakurawa, and other groups (1903-2026). Applied across the full operational lifespan, the cumulative number of free Black Africans captured and enslaved by the Sokoto Caliphate and its operational descendants reaches approximately 10 million people as a conservative estimate. Higher-end estimates approach 12-15 million. Sources: Lovejoy, Transformations in Slavery; Austen, Trans-Saharan Africa in World History; Robin Law, The Oyo Empire, c. 1600-c. 1836 (Oxford, 1977); Joseph C. Miller, Way of Death: Merchant Capitalism and the Angolan Slave Trade (University of Wisconsin Press, 1988); John Hunwick, Arab Views of Black Africans and Slavery (UCLA, 2000). Anticipating Objections Objection: "The Atlantic slave trade enslaved more people." Response: This is a category error. The Atlantic slave trade did not enslave anyone. It was a buyer's market. European ships at coastal forts in Lagos, Ouidah, Elmina, Bonny, and Calabar purchased people who had already been enslaved by African polities. The actual capturing of free Africans was done by Dahomey, Oyo, Asante, Kongo, Lunda, the Aro Confederacy, the Sokoto Caliphate, and others — who marched captives to the coast and sold them. The 12.5 million figure commonly cited for the Atlantic trade is a transportation total, not an enslavement figure. Those 12.5 million people were already enslaved when they reached the ships. The Atlantic trade is therefore not a competing enslaver. Among the actual enslavers — the African polities that captured free people — the Sokoto Caliphate leads by every measure. Objection: "Mali ran longer, so it must have enslaved more cumulatively." Response: Mali operated for ~435 years, but the surviving documentation indicates that Mali's slave operations ran at substantially lower intensity per year than Sokoto's. The trans-Saharan trade volume was a fraction of what Sokoto sustained at its 19th-century peak. Even with the longer duration, Mali's cumulative total is estimated by Austen and Hunwick at 2-4 million, well below Sokoto's 10 million estimate. Objection: "The 50 percent enslaved figure is an exaggeration." Response: It is Lovejoy's own conservative estimate, based on direct demographic and economic documentation from the Caliphate's own administrative records. Lovejoy is the dean of this field. See Transformations in Slavery, 3rd ed., chapters 6-7. Objection: "The Caliphate ended in 1903 when the British conquered it." Response: The official political-military structure was conquered. The throne, the spiritual authority, the emirates, the religious framework, and the slave-taking practices were preserved by the British under the doctrine of indirect rule. The current Sultan, Muhammad Sa'ad Abubakar III, is a direct lineal descendant of the founder Usman dan Fodio through Muhammad Bello, the second caliph. The institution has been operationally continuous for 222 years. Modern slave-taking by Boko Haram, ISWAP, Ansaru, the Fulani militias, and Lakurawa operates within the same theological framework and geographic territory the original Caliphate established. The 2,000+ children kidnapped in mass school raids since 2014 (Amnesty International), the documented sexual slavery of captured women, and the modern slavery population of 1.6 million Nigerians (Walk Free Global Slavery Index 2023) are continuations of the same institution. Objection: "You cannot count modern Boko Haram or ISWAP as 'the Sokoto Caliphate.'" Response: They are not the Caliphate itself. They are its operational descendants, operating under its theological framework, in its geographic territory, and with its political authority structure (the Sultan, the emirs, the JNI, and the NSCIA) presiding in silence above them. The historical continuity is documented in: Murtala Ahmed Rufa'i, James Barnett, and Abdulaziz Abdulaziz, North Western Nigeria: A Jihadization of Banditry, or a 'Bandization' of Jihad? (Hudson Institute / Council on Foreign Relations, 2022); M. A. al-Hajj, The Thirteenth Century in Muslim Eschatology: Mahdist Expectations in the Sokoto Caliphate (University of Ibadan Research Bulletin, 1967); and ongoing reporting by the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. The Strongest Defensible Claim >> Across its 222-year operational history, the Sokoto Caliphate and its operational successor networks have captured and enslaved more free Black Africans than any other entity in recorded history. Cumulative enslavement: approximately 10 million people. The institution remains operative today. << The European Atlantic trade was not an enslaver — it was a buyer of people enslaved by Africans. Among the actual enslavers, no other single entity comes close to Sokoto's totals, intensity, or operational duration. Every clause is defensible. Every figure is sourced. Sokoto sits at the top of the list of single-entity Black-African enslavers by every measurable axis: peak holding, proportional concentration of its own population, and cumulative captures across operational lifetime. Primary Sources Paul E. Lovejoy, Transformations in Slavery: A History of Slavery in Africa, 3rd edition (Cambridge University Press, 2011). Paul E. Lovejoy, Slavery on the Frontiers of Islam (Markus Wiener, 2004). Ralph A. Austen, African Economic History: Internal Development and External Dependency (Heinemann, 1987). Ralph A. Austen, Trans-Saharan Africa in World History (Oxford University Press, 2010). John O. Hunwick, Arab Views of Black Africans and Slavery (UCLA James S. Coleman African Studies Center, 2000). Robin Law, The Oyo Empire, c. 1600-c. 1836: A West African Imperialism in the Era of the Atlantic Slave Trade (Oxford University Press, 1977). M. A. al-Hajj, "The Thirteenth Century in Muslim Eschatology: Mahdist Expectations in the Sokoto Caliphate," Research Bulletin, Centre of Arabic Documentation, University of Ibadan, Vol. 3, No. 2 (July 1967), pp. 100-105. Murtala Ahmed Rufa'i, James Barnett, and Abdulaziz Abdulaziz, North Western Nigeria: A Jihadization of Banditry, or a 'Bandization' of Jihad? (Hudson Institute, 2022). Walk Free Foundation, Global Slavery Index 2023, country profile: Nigeria. Amnesty International, Nigeria: Boko Haram Abductions and Forced Marriages, multiple reports 2014-2025. U.S. Department of State, 2024 Trafficking in Persons Report, country narrative: Nigeria. Prepared for editorial reference. All figures cited are conservative within the published scholarly range. Higher-end estimates approach 12-15 million cumulative. #EarthShaker

$MikeArnoldTruth's tweet photo. The Sokoto Caliphate as the Largest Single-Entity Enslaver of Free Black Africans in Recorded History A Brief for Skeptics Summary of the Claim Over the course of its 222-year operational history (1804–present), the Sokoto Caliphate has captured and enslaved more free Black Africans than any other entity in recorded history. Conservative cumulative estimate: approximately 10 million people. Higher-end estimates: 12-15 million. The institution remains operative in 2026 through its successor armed networks — Boko Haram, ISWAP, the Fulani militias, Lakurawa, Ansaru, and others operating under its theological and political framework. A critical clarification at the outset: the trans-Atlantic slave trade was not an enslaver. It was a buyer's market. European ships at coastal forts in Lagos, Ouidah, Elmina, Bonny, and Calabar purchased people who had already been enslaved by African polities. The actual capturing of free Africans was always done by African enslaving entities. Among those — among the actual enslavers — the Sokoto Caliphate is the largest in recorded history. This brief lays out the documentary basis for the claim, addresses common objections, and provides comparative context. The Foundational Numbers Peak enslaved population (snapshot, late 19th century): Approximately 2 million people, representing roughly 50 percent of the Caliphate's total population. The dominant scholarly authority on this figure is Paul E. Lovejoy, whose Transformations in Slavery: A History of Slavery in Africa (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. 2000; 3rd ed. 2011) remains the standard reference. Lovejoy ranks the Sokoto Caliphate as one of the largest slave societies in modern history by peak holding — comparable in scale to the American South. The 50 percent proportion is itself a superlative. The American South at its peak (1860) held approximately 32 percent of its Deep South population in slavery. Brazil's peak proportion was lower. No major slave society in modern recorded history is documented to have held a higher proportion of its own population in chattel slavery than the Sokoto Caliphate. From Snapshot to Cumulative Total The 2 million peak figure is a holding at one moment. Cumulative slave-taking across the Caliphate's operational history is substantially larger, because: Mortality. Plantation conditions in Sokoto's gandu and rinji estates produced documented high mortality rates. Lovejoy, Transformations, ch. 6, addresses this. Replacement captures were continuous. Trans-Saharan export. Annual exports of 3,000 to 6,000 captives per year, sustained over approximately a century, yield 300,000 to 600,000 people exported north to North African, Ottoman, and Arabian markets. See Ralph A. Austen, African Economic History: Internal Development and External Dependency (Heinemann, 1987), and Austen, Trans-Saharan Africa in World History (Oxford, 2010). Continuous raiding. The Caliphate's slave economy ran on annual raiding expeditions into surrounding non-Muslim communities. Each year of operation produced fresh captures to maintain plantation labor and export streams. Operational duration. 99 years before British conquest (1804-1903), plus 123 years of operationally continuous successor activity through emirate structures, Boko Haram, ISWAP, Ansaru, the Fulani militias, Lakurawa, and other groups (1903-2026). Applied across the full operational lifespan, the cumulative number of free Black Africans captured and enslaved by the Sokoto Caliphate and its operational descendants reaches approximately 10 million people as a conservative estimate. Higher-end estimates approach 12-15 million. Sources: Lovejoy, Transformations in Slavery; Austen, Trans-Saharan Africa in World History; Robin Law, The Oyo Empire, c. 1600-c. 1836 (Oxford, 1977); Joseph C. Miller, Way of Death: Merchant Capitalism and the Angolan Slave Trade (University of Wisconsin Press, 1988); John Hunwick, Arab Views of Black Africans and Slavery (UCLA, 2000). Anticipating Objections Objection: "The Atlantic slave trade enslaved more people." Response: This is a category error. The Atlantic slave trade did not enslave anyone. It was a buyer's market. European ships at coastal forts in Lagos, Ouidah, Elmina, Bonny, and Calabar purchased people who had already been enslaved by African polities. The actual capturing of free Africans was done by Dahomey, Oyo, Asante, Kongo, Lunda, the Aro Confederacy, the Sokoto Caliphate, and others — who marched captives to the coast and sold them. The 12.5 million figure commonly cited for the Atlantic trade is a transportation total, not an enslavement figure. Those 12.5 million people were already enslaved when they reached the ships. The Atlantic trade is therefore not a competing enslaver. Among the actual enslavers — the African polities that captured free people — the Sokoto Caliphate leads by every measure. Objection: "Mali ran longer, so it must have enslaved more cumulatively." Response: Mali operated for ~435 years, but the surviving documentation indicates that Mali's slave operations ran at substantially lower intensity per year than Sokoto's. The trans-Saharan trade volume was a fraction of what Sokoto sustained at its 19th-century peak. Even with the longer duration, Mali's cumulative total is estimated by Austen and Hunwick at 2-4 million, well below Sokoto's 10 million estimate. Objection: "The 50 percent enslaved figure is an exaggeration." Response: It is Lovejoy's own conservative estimate, based on direct demographic and economic documentation from the Caliphate's own administrative records. Lovejoy is the dean of this field. See Transformations in Slavery, 3rd ed., chapters 6-7. Objection: "The Caliphate ended in 1903 when the British conquered it." Response: The official political-military structure was conquered. The throne, the spiritual authority, the emirates, the religious framework, and the slave-taking practices were preserved by the British under the doctrine of indirect rule. The current Sultan, Muhammad Sa'ad Abubakar III, is a direct lineal descendant of the founder Usman dan Fodio through Muhammad Bello, the second caliph. The institution has been operationally continuous for 222 years. Modern slave-taking by Boko Haram, ISWAP, Ansaru, the Fulani militias, and Lakurawa operates within the same theological framework and geographic territory the original Caliphate established. The 2,000+ children kidnapped in mass school raids since 2014 (Amnesty International), the documented sexual slavery of captured women, and the modern slavery population of 1.6 million Nigerians (Walk Free Global Slavery Index 2023) are continuations of the same institution. Objection: "You cannot count modern Boko Haram or ISWAP as 'the Sokoto Caliphate.'" Response: They are not the Caliphate itself. They are its operational descendants, operating under its theological framework, in its geographic territory, and with its political authority structure (the Sultan, the emirs, the JNI, and the NSCIA) presiding in silence above them. The historical continuity is documented in: Murtala Ahmed Rufa'i, James Barnett, and Abdulaziz Abdulaziz, North Western Nigeria: A Jihadization of Banditry, or a 'Bandization' of Jihad? (Hudson Institute / Council on Foreign Relations, 2022); M. A. al-Hajj, The Thirteenth Century in Muslim Eschatology: Mahdist Expectations in the Sokoto Caliphate (University of Ibadan Research Bulletin, 1967); and ongoing reporting by the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. The Strongest Defensible Claim >> Across its 222-year operational history, the Sokoto Caliphate and its operational successor networks have captured and enslaved more free Black Africans than any other entity in recorded history. Cumulative enslavement: approximately 10 million people. The institution remains operative today. << The European Atlantic trade was not an enslaver — it was a buyer of people enslaved by Africans. Among the actual enslavers, no other single entity comes close to Sokoto's totals, intensity, or operational duration. Every clause is defensible. Every figure is sourced. Sokoto sits at the top of the list of single-entity Black-African enslavers by every measurable axis: peak holding, proportional concentration of its own population, and cumulative captures across operational lifetime. Primary Sources Paul E. Lovejoy, Transformations in Slavery: A History of Slavery in Africa, 3rd edition (Cambridge University Press, 2011). Paul E. Lovejoy, Slavery on the Frontiers of Islam (Markus Wiener, 2004). Ralph A. Austen, African Economic History: Internal Development and External Dependency (Heinemann, 1987). Ralph A. Austen, Trans-Saharan Africa in World History (Oxford University Press, 2010). John O. Hunwick, Arab Views of Black Africans and Slavery (UCLA James S. Coleman African Studies Center, 2000). Robin Law, The Oyo Empire, c. 1600-c. 1836: A West African Imperialism in the Era of the Atlantic Slave Trade (Oxford University Press, 1977). M. A. al-Hajj, "The Thirteenth Century in Muslim Eschatology: Mahdist Expectations in the Sokoto Caliphate," Research Bulletin, Centre of Arabic Documentation, University of Ibadan, Vol. 3, No. 2 (July 1967), pp. 100-105. Murtala Ahmed Rufa'i, James Barnett, and Abdulaziz Abdulaziz, North Western Nigeria: A Jihadization of Banditry, or a 'Bandization' of Jihad? (Hudson Institute, 2022). Walk Free Foundation, Global Slavery Index 2023, country profile: Nigeria. Amnesty International, Nigeria: Boko Haram Abductions and Forced Marriages, multiple reports 2014-2025. U.S. Department of State, 2024 Trafficking in Persons Report, country narrative: Nigeria. Prepared for editorial reference. All figures cited are conservative within the published scholarly range. Higher-end estimates approach 12-15 million cumulative. #EarthShaker$

425

313

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted

10 days ago

Press release: 6/6/2026 Brazil Recognizes the United State of Biafra USB and its May 30th Memorial Day by passing Motion Number 186 (attached) in the legislature Special thanks to the government of Brazil, USB Head of Mission in Brazil and USB Citizens in Brazil There is urgent need to stop the terrorist state of Nigeria from killing my People and the USB government will work with any of our allies that lends the support to us first We are closer home than ever Thanks Brazil DPM https://t.co/PNbSW3F3ON @MELANIATRUMP @IvankaTrump @realDonaldTrump @BBCWorld @BBCBreaking @BBCNews @CNN @cnnbrk @cnni @StateDept @SecRubio @mrubin1971 @alexstubb @yleuutiset @Huuhkajat @WhiteHouse @USBDPM @WalidPhares @jihadwatchRS @GunterFehlinger @HQNigerianArmy @MobilePunch @SaharaReporters @netanyahu @VladimierPutin @CapitaineIb226 @UNHumanRights @UN_HRC @_AfricanUnion @AmnestyNigeria @PoliceNG

ngoziora's tweet photo. Press release: 6/6/2026

Brazil Recognizes the United State of Biafra USB and its May 30th Memorial Day by passing Motion Number 186 (attached) in the legislature

Special thanks to the government of Brazil, USB Head of Mission in Brazil and USB Citizens in Brazil

There is urgent need to stop the terrorist state of Nigeria from killing my People and the USB government will work with any of our allies that lends the support to us first

We are closer home than ever

Thanks Brazil

DPM

https://t.co/PNbSW3F3ON

@MELANIATRUMP @IvankaTrump @realDonaldTrump @BBCWorld @BBCBreaking @BBCNews @CNN @cnnbrk @cnni @StateDept @SecRubio @mrubin1971 @alexstubb @yleuutiset @Huuhkajat @WhiteHouse @USBDPM @WalidPhares @jihadwatchRS @GunterFehlinger @HQNigerianArmy @MobilePunch @SaharaReporters @netanyahu @VladimierPutin @CapitaineIb226 @UNHumanRights @UN_HRC @_AfricanUnion @AmnestyNigeria @PoliceNG

554

378

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted

10 days ago

For those wanting the full picture on the BBC doc “Surviving Biafra”: I encourage everyone to watch this film. Not because it is perfect or encyclopedic, but because it raises awareness—in a sensitive, human way—of a massive injustice buried for decades. My prior review noted it leaves much unsaid. In those gaps, you see the director’s inherited bias toward the federal side (grandson of a senior federal officer featured prominently). I don’t see it as propaganda or deliberate falsehoods, but a flawed push for “balance” where the truth is far more one-sided. An honest viewer will finish with eyes opened, genuine horror, and questions. Here’s a guide to exploring those questions: 1. The Asaba Massacre (Oct 1967): Federal troops slaughtered hundreds of unarmed Igbo civilians (men/boys in white, pledging loyalty to “One Nigeria”). Early war atrocity that fueled secession fears. Why omitted? 2. The Aburi Accord betrayal (Jan 1967): Last chance for peaceful confederation/autonomy after northern pogroms. Gowon reneged. Biafra didn’t rush to exit—they tried negotiation first. 3. The Blockade & British Oil Calculus: Deliberate starvation policy (as many as millions of children via kwashiorkor). Britain backed Nigeria for Shell-BP oil interests. Not neutral—complicit in the famine. 4. The Same Drivers Today: This wasn’t isolated. Same jihad patterns, impunity, resource grabs, and genocidal intent continue in the Middle Belt—targeted Christian killings, church burnings, land seizures (Intersociety: ~185k dead, ~20k churches destroyed since 2009). Biafra’s Hidden Holocaust echoes now. 5. Religious Underpinnings: The violence wasn’t just political or ethnic. It fits classical Islamic jihad doctrine—conquest, subjugation of Christians (jizya while humbled, Dar al-Islam vs. Dar al-Harb), and Sokoto Caliphate continuity. Pogroms, blockade, and ongoing Middle Belt attacks reflect the same unreformed ideology. 6. Were the Biafrans “Rebels”? No. They were a persecuted people exercising self-defense and self-determination after northern massacres, failed accords, and existential threat. Labeling them “rebels” delegitimizes their response while whitewashing federal aggression. 7. Who Fired First? Federal Nigerian troops. The first shots of the war were fired on July 6, 1967, by federal forces (under Operation Unicord) at Gakem/Garkem in Biafran territory. Biafra declared independence on May 30 after years of pogroms and broken promises—this was invasion — a peaceful people, shackled to a blood thirsty caliphate against their will, who tried to negotiate coexistence, but were betrayed and slaughtered — not rebellion. Watch it. Wrestle with it. Then join the real conversation. #EarthShaker https://t.co/Wl3CfBiR0c

370

255

11K

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted

Rachel Nwosu @ObiJYkKg6QGWMAD

about 1 year ago

Breaking Memories: Biafra Child eulogizes PM Simon Ekpa (watch video) Such can never be said of a terrorist accomplice. Simon Ekpas is the Good Guy

871

590

16K

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted

10 days ago

Shabbat Shalom everyone. After our successful 30th May memorial in Israel we continued with our activities at the parliament. Soon good news will be heard and seen. Wait a little while. Elohim/ Chukwu Okike Abiama is with us and with Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. Have a blessed weekend 🙏🏽❤

ObiJYkKg6QGWMAD's tweet photo. Shabbat Shalom everyone. After our successful 30th May memorial in Israel we continued with our activities at the parliament. Soon good news will be heard and seen. Wait a little while. Elohim/ Chukwu Okike Abiama is with us and with Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. Have a blessed weekend 🙏🏽❤ https://t.co/GfWMmZYrdO

100

890

319

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted

11 days ago

Press release: 6/4/2026 The fee set by Nigeria Bianca Onoh Ojukwu, President Tinubu to bail each of the over 3 million Biafrans they are holding at various jails across Nigeria and in Biafra territory; Their crime; Being United States of Biafra Christian citizens and rejecting Nigeria Report from a USB Barrister that was in court today 6/4/2026 to assist Mr E……. Typical economic sabotage of the new Christian Nation of the United States of Biafra and its citizens by the Nigeria President Tinubu , Charles Soludo, Fubara ,Uzodinma, Alex Oti, peter Mbah and their politicians such as Peter Obi (he is fully aware of this fraud going on daily and never talked about it publicly due to his political ploy) “Her Excellency Update on the case of E…….. 1. Court sat. 2. Our client was produced in court but very late. 3. The Prosecution was in court and ready to open their case. 4. Meanwhile, I needed to have a look at the Information but was told that the lawyer that the Prosecution gave our client on the day of his arraignment had it. 5. Based on my application, the matter was adjourned to July …, 2026 for hearing. 6. I went in search of the said lawyer referred to above and found him but he informed me that the Information was in his other vehicle which was in his house. I urged him to waybill it to me. 7. However, we can get it by applying to court for a certified true copy of it because waiting for that lawyer may delay the proceedings. My next plan: 1. To review the case, 2. To file and serve a bail application in court before the next adjourned date, and 3. To prepare our client for trial proper. Cost of Litigation: 1. Cost of filing and serving Bail Application is assessed at ₦120,000.00 2. Professional fee to handle the matter from beginning to conclusion is assessed at ₦2M. 3. Appearance fee for each court day is assessed at ₦20,000.00 Thus, we need the filing fees immediately and an advance payment of ₦500,000.00 from our professional fee. Do not hesitate to call for clarifications Thanks. E-Signed Barr. ……….” The above report is from a Barrister assigned by the United States of Biafra to assist in the bail process of innocent United States of Biafra citizen forcefully removed from his home by Nigeria President Tinubu, Christopher Musa, Fubara, Bianca Ojukwu Onoh, Charles Soludo using their special squads in USB Christian Nation. Tinubu and his politicians placed the bail applications and processes at around 2 million Naira per Biafran to continue the Sokoto Caliphate economic sabotage on the Biafra people and this has been ongoing since 1960s for no crime except being USB citizen When the USB government do fundraisings, it is for purposes as this. This economic sabotage and exploitation of the new Christian Nation of USB and its citizens by Nigeria drug lord and politicians cannot continue. I hereby call on appropriate agencies to look into these crimes against humanity by the Nigeria state, its politicians and reintegrated terrorists working in Nigeria prisons Nigeria is currently forcefully occupying a sovereign Nation and has been told to leave DPM @MELANIATRUMP @IvankaTrump @TrumpWarRoom @POTUS @BBCWorld @BBCBreaking @BBCNews @cnni @cnnbrk @FoxNews @SkyNewsBreak @UN_Spokesperson @UN_HRC @UNHumanRights @StateDept @alexstubb @SaharaReporters @SecRubio @ObiJYkKg6QGWMAD @jihadwatchRS @MobilePunch @MikeArnoldTruth @netanyahu @IDF @USArmy @FBIDirectorKash @FBI @INTERPOL_HQ @Interpol @CIA @Europarl_EN @Huuhkajat @yleuutiset @CCSoludo @PeterObi @CCSoludo @HQNigerianArmy @PoliceNG @AmnestyNigeria @amnestyusa @MobilePunch @SaharaReporters @SecRubio @WalidPhares @jihadwatchRS @channelstv @Huuhkajat @yleuutiset

364

289

FreemanFreedom9 retweeted