chang wook said his first step is winning over the people he works with through sincerity, then admitted yejin was the one person he failed to win over 😭 and she really said “i didn’t feel it.” 🤣 they’re too funny pls 😭
mc: if you have your own secret weapon for winning someone over, could we hear them one by one, from actor ji chang wook himself?
chang wook: i actually think about that a lot when i’m on set. if i can’t win over my fellow actors, staff, or directors, if i can’t earn their trust, i feel like being on set becomes really difficult and scary. so, for me, winning over the people i work with is always the first step. it’s really important, but honestly, i think all i have is sincerity. i invest my time, show them who i really am, and show them how hard i’m working. i think people eventually feel that.
yejin: (joking) i didn’t feel it. 🤣🤣🤣
changwook: ah… well, i guess i failed for the first and only time this time. i tried to win senior yejin’s heart..
yejin:🤣🤣🤣 ah, i’m just kidding
nana: but honestly, i don’t think i’ve ever seen him frowning on set, or looking tired or exhausted.
chang wook: i only curse in the car.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
#nana #jichangwook #sonyejin
ソンイェジンとチチャンウク、『スキャンダル』の10代の姿はすべてCGだった···「『クラシック』の時の姿を参考に」
손예진·지창욱, '스캔들' 10대 모습 모두 CG였다…“'클래식' 때 모습 참고”('홍건데')[셀럽캡처]
https://t.co/vGDXetZIvx
21日に公開された『宣伝しに来たのは確かだけど』
JI CHANG WOOK HAVE TO PRESS THE BUTTON AT TEN SEC TO GET SOFT TOY BUT EVERYONE SAID ITS IMPOSSIBLE, BUT HIS COMPITITIVE ASS GOES TO TRY AND HE RELLY STOP THE TIMER AT 10 SEC.
LOOK HOW MICH EVERYONE SHOCKED LOL
MIT published a brutally honest report on what AI is doing to students.
A committee of professors and students spent five months studying how AI changed learning on campus, and the findings read like a warning to every university on the planet.
Study groups are disappearing. Office hours are emptying out. Problem sets and take-home exams no longer prove anything, because AI can produce credible solutions to almost any written assignment in the undergraduate curriculum. Students who lean on chatbots lose mastery and confidence, and some slip into what the report calls cognitive surrender, reaching for AI at the first hint of struggle.
The numbers are rough. 46 percent of surveyed MIT undergrads use LLMs daily. 90 percent worry about their own overreliance. Undergrads who feel AI makes them replaceable now outnumber those who feel it makes them capable.
The committee's answer surprised me. They refused to fight AI with surveillance. The report calls AI detectors unreliable, says lockdown browsers feel like spying, and warns that policing students builds a classroom atmosphere of mutual distrust.
Instead, MIT wants to rebuild education around the things AI can't replace. That means oral exams, semester portfolios, in-person project work, and a required social component in every subject. The report even floats the idea of rethinking grades entirely, since without a GPA to optimize, much of the incentive to cheat with AI evaporates.
The committee warns professors against replacing undergrad research assistants with AI agents just because they're cheaper, because a university exists to grow people, not output.
The most famous tech school on earth admitted the machines broke its way of teaching. Its answer is more humans, not more software.