@jackduval@retardmode I love how you don’t address the original point which was that the actual bubble map you highlighted is not even the accurate one.
Faggot.
@gummibear737 I remember years ago you actually used to provide value. Good commentary on Covid, the war on Ukraine, even if I disagreed, I could tell you were being objective in your analysis.
Now your page is just resentment that your genre of conservatism is losing. Shame.
'Experts in Cyber' (who have never got r00t) who are now experts in AI (using AI to write about AI).... is a massive red flag to me.
If you think this is about you either:
a) it is
b) it's not
:P
I hate the word "late stage capitalism", but how much more do they want to bleed people dry? You've got ads, unskippable ads, ads inside of ads, sponsored content ads, YouTube Premium+, now a pseudo-prove-you-are-an-adult tax.
Whats next? Do they want you to submit a blood and stool sample to prove you're a human to combat spam?
Don't worry, Chat. YouTube has a brilliant solution to prove you're sufficiently old enough to view slop content.
If you don't feel comfortable giving YouTube (Google) a photo copy of your driver's license or passport, you can instead just tell them your banking information.
These companies don't give a fuck about you or your children. They want to see your face crystal clear so they can sell it and track you. So instead they've got another option to make your life "better', they'll just get straight to the point and take your money.
It's perfect. It's almost like a "I don't want to show you my face" tax
@gummibear737 What is this nonsense? The U.S. backs sovereignty ONLY when it suits its interests. How many governments has it overthrown. Territorial wars didn’t stop (Korea, Vietnam)
U.S. prioritizes influence over ideals. Sovereignty was and still is conditional, not a universal principle.
@gummibear737@MattyParks12 This is untrue. You engage in performative posturing, feigning intellectual honesty while dismissing any critique of your worldview as mere propaganda or deceitful grifting. This transparent facade is precisely why your audience has dwindled to insignificance.
@EthicalSkeptic@TChapman500 Couldn’t one infer then that the flood narrative as depicted on the Bible is feasible? Pockets of vegetation that persisted or re-emerged in areas not completely submerged would support the biblical timeline (47 days) where the dove finds an olive leaf after the waters recede.
@EthicalSkeptic@TChapman500 I know from personal experience that vegetation, when not entirely inundated, can endure subaqueous conditions and exhibit foliar regeneration promptly upon the recession of water levels. In my view, this is the best explanation, although I admit it's flawed…
@EthicalSkeptic@TChapman500 I agree with you but to play devils advocate.
The "flood" could have been a localized event, the "mountains of Ararat," being considerably lower in altitude allowed flora at lower elevations to either endure or rapidly regenerate post-inundation.
Bro, these folks don’t get this. When the Talibs used to hide in a mosque, we had to let them be. So long as they weren’t actively shooting at us.
I said the same thing about their “boating op” shooting spree. Shooting guys in the water, unarmed, just a few meters from their boat. Not only is that a war crime, it’s terminating potential Intel gathering! Ain’t gonna be an easier detainee than an unarmed person swimming hundreds of meters from the beach.
Lol, lmao even—
Crusaders:
- sell everything
- walk 2000+ miles through strange lands
- nearly starve
- fight enemies in legendary battles
- fight bears
- retake city where Jesus was crucified
- keep fighting
Bharatanubhuti: "What's the big deal?"