@ICT2023Trader yes, I thought this fvg only [leaving other pd arrays] is not a good upgrade to the TTFM model. but It is working good.
Got this idea to work on weekend.
@Sonance_Harsi@JustExecution@CantoIndicators@matt_loeber I dont know about the fractality of that model.
TTFM, CRT are the two i know so far, can be done mechanical. With decent manual intervention, you can have a good profitability.
@Sonance_Harsi@JustExecution@CantoIndicators Well I will give a heads up on what i am working on right now. Its like Gxt model
lets say HTF have SSMT - MTF C2/SMT - LTF continuation CISD Entry. This is the sequence
eg: Daily SSMT - 4h C2/SMT - 15M CISD entry[can refine to 5m]
If anybody else trying it, well and good.
@Sonance_Harsi@JustExecution@CantoIndicators Well I will give a heads up on what i am working on right now. Its like Gxt model
lets say HTF have SSMT - MTF C2/SMT - LTF continuation CISD Entry. This is the sequence
eg: Daily SSMT - 4h C2/SMT - 15M CISD entry[can refine to 5m]
If anybody else trying it, well and good.
I am gonna push an update to my fractal indicator in git repo[in bio]
Which fixes the following things:
1. While turning off the live setups option, the confirmed setup were not shown after c2
2. Setups are getting invalidated after c4
3. And few more performance bugs
@JustExecution Yeah that would be a good integration.
Way before i have improvised a session Indicator[tweaked from TFO's] will plan to integrate but not in this Indicator, will be a new one.
I am gonna push an update to my fractal indicator in git repo[in bio]
Which fixes the following things:
1. While turning off the live setups option, the confirmed setup were not shown after c2
2. Setups are getting invalidated after c4
3. And few more performance bugs