To put in perspective how rediculous the Tyler Robinson case is, let’s take a look at the Scott Peterson case.
- Peterson was having an affair with a woman. He told this woman that his wife had died one week before her murder.
- His affair partner worked with the police to record months of incriminating phone calls with Peterson
- Peterson bought a boat right before the murder and didn’t tell anyone. He also never fished. On the morning of her murder his story was he was fishing for hours in his boat.
- her body was found where he was “fishing.”
- he had made several homemade cement “anchors” right before the murder
- despite the current “everyone grieves differently” narrative, police actually take note when the spouse of the victim are caught fake crying and not really caring that much about the murder. Scott Peterson was observed acting like Erika Kirk for months.
- there was no alternative theory to her murder or any alternative suspects.
- his story changed several times and it appeared he was planning to flee to Mexico.
Here’s the kicker. The court recently opened the case up to allow new evidence on an appeal.
At no point did he media say “how dare you attack a widower. Everyone grieves differently.”
Tyler Robinson:
- Is not identifiable on camera shooting or even holding a weapon in an area with lots and lots of cameras.
- there’s never been a demonstration officially or even on any YouTube channel that shows that the 30-06 could have possibly been the murder weapon.
- it’s claimed he was hiding a 46 inch rifle with a scope in his skinny jeans.
- he did not confess to police or any friend or family member outside of extremely suspicious text messages sent to a very suspicious guy who has been given immunity who’s dna is on the claimed murder weapon.
- the crime scene was paved over 4 days after the event.
- TPUSA employees are observed removing evidence from the crime scene.
- Charlie Kirk’s body is not available for any testing. Neither are his clothing. Or any aspect of the crime.
- no one was tested for gun powder or bomb residue
- Tyler Robinson has no military experience and has been described as “not political.”
- the states only witness has testified that Tyler Robinson “never mentioned Charlie Kirk.”
- the entire investigation into the Charlie Kirk murder lasted a little over a day despite two other people confessing on the day of the killing.
- the wife of the victim has been caught lying about the doctor, stating that he said “Charlie had a neck of steal” which explained why there was no exit wound. The doctor has denied that.
- the testimony of turning point USA employees have changed several times since the event, and at no point do they appear to be curious who actually killed Charlie Kirk.
- Erika Kirk is very angry about people trying to figure out who killed her husband. She feels really bad for the guy she claims killed her husband.
- when Charlie Kirk was “shot” we can observe his security behave in a way that suggests they knew there was no longer any threat whatsoever that there could possibly be more shots. Several employees are seen quickly getting on their phones and not taking cover.
- the victims wife has openly bragged about how much merch she sold the week of the murder after presenting herself to the world the fireworks dressed like a promiscuous Disney princess.
- Charlie Kirk was publicly very against a war that started pretty soon after his murder.
- his close circle of friends and political allies have made billions of dollars in profit from the war that started right after his murder.
- TPUSA pays and requests influencers to attack anyone suspicious of their behavior, or anyone trying to figure out who actually killed their friend.
The people directly profiting from the murder of Charlie Kirk, despite this overwhelming doubt, insist that Tyler Robinson be executed by the state. This proves they are completely capable of first degree murder.
Hmmm
La deuda pública sostenible no existe. Es expropiación diferida.
El mecanismo es simple: el Estado gasta más de lo que recauda, emite bonos para cubrir la diferencia, y cuando el mercado deja de absorberlos voluntariamente, el banco central los compra con dinero creado de la nada.
Cada bono es un reclamo futuro sobre recursos reales que todavía no se produjeron. Eso no es financiamiento, es una promesa de expropiación sobre quienes todavía no votan o todavía no nacieron.
Cuando esos reclamos se acumulan más rápido que la capacidad productiva real, el ajuste llega igual. Pero llega por la vía más regresiva posible: inflación, que destruye primero el poder adquisitivo de quienes menos capacidad tienen de protegerse.
Italia es el caso de manual. Su deuda llego en torno al 130% del PBI (2025), crecimiento real cercano a cero durante décadas. Los intereses consumen una porción creciente del presupuesto, lo cual exige más deuda para pagar la deuda anterior.
La espiral solo se posterga mientras el BCE siga monetizando bonos italianos a costa de diluir el euro para todos los europeos. No es estabilidad, es un default en cámara lenta disfrazado de política monetaria.
Grecia ya mostró el final de la película. Décadas de déficit financiado con deuda barata bajo el paraguas del euro, hasta que el mercado cortó el crédito y la ficción se derrumbó. Los rescates no rescataron a los griegos sino a los bancos acreedores franceses y alemanes.
La austeridad posterior no recortó el Estado, subió impuestos al sector privado ya asfixiado. El PBI cayó un 25% y la deuda, después de todo, terminó más alta que antes. Lo que llaman gestión responsable de la deuda es administración de la decadencia.
Japón es el que usan como contraejemplo, y es su peor argumento. Más del 260% del PBI en deuda, el Banco de Japón convertido en el mayor tenedor de sus propios bonos, tres décadas sin crecimiento real.
Que no haya habido colapso abrupto no demuestra sostenibilidad. Demuestra que la destrucción puede repartirse en forma de décadas perdidas y una demografía que colapsa en parte porque la carga fiscal hace inviable formar una familia.
Mises explicó por qué nada de esto puede funcionar. Sin precios de mercado genuinos para el crédito, no hay forma de distinguir inversión productiva de consumo de capital disfrazado.
Cuando el Estado se endeuda a tasas artificialmente bajas sostenidas por la autoridad monetaria, falsifica la tasa de interés, que es la señal que refleja la preferencia temporal real de la sociedad. Todo lo que se construye sobre esa señal falsa es malinversión que tarde o temprano se liquida.
La solución no es reestructurar plazos ni inventar ratios mágicos de deuda sobre PBI. Es dejar de gastar lo que no se tiene. Recorte drástico, eliminación de déficits, y que los Estados insolventes enfrenten el default como lo enfrentaría cualquier actor privado en un mercado libre.
El privilegio de endeudarse indefinidamente sin consecuencias no existe en la realidad económica. Solo existe en la fantasía de quienes controlan la máquina de imprimir billetes.
No hay deuda pública sostenible. Hay deuda pública cuyo costo todavía no se hizo visible. Y la deuda pública no debería existir.
Great article by @gladstein focusing on a point that gets little mention: fiat is the only reason predatory lenders like the IMF & World Bank can carry out their crimes against the world's poor.
Heart disease is the leading cause of death
But it’s insulin resistance that causes heart disease, strokes, cancers and other inflammatory conditions
Since your doctor won’t help you avoid it, here are 42 sentences that will:
@CarlsoRamrezR@MeVacuno@ministeriosalud@ximenaguilera@CCuadradoN@AraosFernando me imagino que al ministerio también se le puede preguntar por los contratos. No creo que te respondan el tweet pero a menos que con las vacunas hayan hecho una excepción, aquí en la ley dice que sí te deben mostrar el contrato. https://t.co/C3wuDImQug
Only parasites who benefit from inflation believe there's a trade-off between inflation & recessions.
Anyone with a brain understands inflation is itself the cause of recessions & the only way to fight recessions is to stop inflation.
#ReadRothbard
@sinnombre1974@ximenaguilera@gabrielboric dónde se puede ver este video entero? es bien poco serio cortar la frase ahí mismo. démosle el beneficio de la duda a la nueva ministra para que demuestre que está por Chile y no por otros intereses
TIME spoke to "Gender Queer" author and illustrator Maia Kobabe on about eir work, the efforts to restrict access to eir writing, and what ey make of the current cultural moment https://t.co/JLdmgu5lCL