4MANGANG

Constitutional Conservative, Originalist, Patriot, Christian, Father, Husband, Coach. A handful of common sense goes a long way...no feels allowed.

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@BuckSexton @kenzie45230 @CNN

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@HighRawMama @inittowinit007 @realDonaldTrump @DonaldJTrumpJr

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@TrumpsGAGirl @gatewaypundit If Obama and the gang wont for treason and all of their crimes, no chance in hell these 2 get convicted of anything!

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@MBOKSR_MAGA @JoVotes45

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@RealPeachyKeen2 @TinaMowery2 @danabrams Biggest political scandal in history
https://t.co/jgHG7QCIKk

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@seanhannity @Anon_decoder https://t.co/0JD76D5fxY

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@Anon_decoder

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@TomCottonAR @GenFlynn https://t.co/vb4qy8wBuF

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@Heywood98 @cjdtwit @dawg_lb @GenFlynn @GoJackFlynn @SidneyPowell1 @POTUS The Constitution makes clear that judiciary has no business second-guessing prosecutorial decisions; upheld by the Fokker case just a few weeks ago. That’s what Michael Flynn judge Emmet Sullivan decided to do. Exec branch sole right and power to prosecute no one else can!

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@joegooding @TinaMowery2 @POTUS @realDonaldTrump @IamMonicaRae @RoseDC11 @cjdtwit @DGPurser @Julietknows1 @MAGAGwen @nina14p @vaxchoiceeast @MaryMargaretTK @plantlady293 The U.S. Constitution makes clear that the judiciary has no business second-guessing prosecutorial decisions; upheld by the Fokker case just a few weeks ago. That’s what Michael Flynn judge Emmet Sullivan decided to do.

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@pvtjokerus @kimmi_chelle Sullivan should know better. In 2008, he threw out a corruption charge against Alaska Republican Sen. Ted Stevens based on prosecutorial misconduct. “For 25 years I've told defendants they'd receive a fair trial… I've never seen such mishandling or misconduct.”

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@mattgaetz @RNcat50 @CNN @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/tlW4NVmlBT

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@TrumpsGAGirl The U.S. Constitution makes clear that the judiciary has no business second-guessing prosecutorial decisions; upheld by the Fokker case just a few weeks ago. That’s what Michael Flynn judge Emmet Sullivan decided to do.

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@catturd2 @realDonaldTrump @LindseyGrahamSC Grenell done more in 3 weeks than Republican senate has done in 3 years!

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@RealMattCouch Grenell has done more in 3 weeks than Republican senate has done in 3 years!

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@seanhannity @Anon_decoder Under the Fokker Case, the DC Circuit which governs Judge Sullivan made it very clear if the government (DOJ) wants to dismiss a case, the District Court (Sullivan) cannot refuse to do so just because he doesn’t like the government’s theory. Unconstitutional!

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@AmericanGrit365 @polishprincessh @gatewaypundit @GenFlynn @SidneyPowell1 @realDonaldTrump Under the Fokker Case, the DC Circuit which governs Judge Sullivan made it very clear if the government (DOJ) wants to dismiss a case, the District Court (Sullivan) cannot refuse to do so just because he doesn’t like the government’s theory. Unconstitutional!

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@RealMattCouch Under the Fokker Case, the DC Circuit which governs Judge Sullivan made it very clear if the government (DOJ) wants to dismiss a case, the District Court (Sullivan) cannot refuse to do so just because he doesn’t like the government’s theory. Unconstitutional!

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@dbongino Under the Fokker Case, the DC Circuit which governs Judge Sullivan made it very clear if the government (DOJ) wants to dismiss a case, the District Court (Sullivan) cannot refuse to do so just because he doesn’t like the government’s theory. Unconstitutional!

[4MANGANG @garyjf75]

@dbongino Under the Fokker Case, the DC Circuit which governs Judge Sullivan made it very clear if the government (DOJ) wants to dismiss a case, the District Court (Sullivan) cannot refuse to do so just because he doesn’t like the government’s theory. Unconstitutional!