ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ.

Apostolate of irēnic discrimination ✄ Determination ist Negation ᛣ 'Awake! strengthen what remains and is about to die' ᛣ no peace without truth ᛣ #SiegHeiland

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

No consciousness - no conscience - without discrimination, no dignity - indeed no destiny - without difference, no identity - yea, no humanity - without honesty.

Endeavour over indulgence, strive over restraint,
piety over morality, virtues over values,
venture or perish.

Omnis determinatio est negatio
et gratia not tollit naturam,
sed perficit.

𐌰𐌲𐌰𐍀𐌴
ΙΧΘΥΣ
ᛟ ᛞ ᚨ ᛚ

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

@MT_Neumann Es zu sagen würde, gemäß der eigenen Einordnung, heißen, die betreffenden (vielen) Deutschen böse zu nennen, es nicht zu sagen heißt indessen unweigerlich, sie dumm zu nennen; beides ziemlich dreist aus dem Mund eines Türken.

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

@MartinSellner_ humanism killed him.

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

Contemporary third world mass-migration is an industrial scale violation of the 10th commandment; they're not indigent but insolent. All proportion suited for biblically wholesome sojourning, apart from visiting friends and family (speaking of peoples), has been destroyed.

With foreignness becoming the most social-cognitively pervasive phenomenon, it has also become the only pertinent social-/moral-epistemic category; it's not a woman, it's not a child, it's not a neighbour, it's not human - it is but foreign flesh.

No one likes what this implies, but this is the fatigued thymotic-syneidetic status quo; and if we don't act accordingly (that is, do what we must now because we failed to do what we ought then), no one will.

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

Magnanimity is genuine only as the quintessence of humility.

This principle is psychologically reflected in how greater talents, in light of genuine self-reflection/examination of conscience, entail more humility, not less (popular conscience also registers this, as evidenced by how people who are elected for some office or chosen for a leadership role almost reflexively profess that they're "humbled" by it); and also how a gifted person who is arrogant is pretty much the most despised creature imaginable:

"𝘔𝘢𝘯 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘳𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴; 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵, 𝘪𝘯 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭-𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘤𝘺, 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴, 𝘪𝘯 𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦, 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳𝘴, 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘧���𝘳 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴—𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘢𝘸𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘶𝘭𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘴 𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦, 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴. 𝘛𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦, 𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘫𝘰𝘺𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘪𝘮, 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘧𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘰𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘳 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘢 𝘯𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘺 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘵, 𝘣𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘳 𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘩 ����𝘰 𝘩𝘪𝘮. 𝘗𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘈𝘯 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭, 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘴𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘺𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘥𝘶𝘴𝘵-𝘤𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘵. 𝘖𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘩𝘪𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘶𝘯𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘣𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘦 𝘸��𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘣𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘵—𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘸𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴, 𝘧𝘰𝘳 ��𝘹𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦. 𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘮𝘦𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘧 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦; 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘭𝘪𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺."

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

A guilty conscience, it seems, only arises when the actor perceives their actions as violations not just of nature, but of 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 nature; which is an instructive notion and working hypothesis for the peculiarist/ethno-traducianist investigation of differences in "in-group honour."

Speaking pastorally rather than polemically, this speaks to why christian conscience has the legitimate moral highground: it registers violations against the "new nature." Not just the old nature, which is not erased but enhanced, not eliminated but elevated, not purged but perfected, by grace.

Violations/transgressions against such new nature, nature enhanced/perfected/corrected by grace, are called sins.

Such conscience is also, of course, the condition of the possibility of the best thing in the world - repentance.

- 死ね!同人 𝗦𝗛𝗜-𝗡𝗘 𝗗ō𝗷𝗶𝗻, 𝗜𝗡𝗣.
𝘷 𝘦 𝘯 𝘵 𝘶 𝘳 𝘦 𝘰 𝘳 𝘱 𝘦 𝘳 𝘪 𝘴 𝘩

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

The more impotent the many, the more important the few. Never despair at the quantitative aspect of the struggle. Keep the fire, for the best, when corrupted, becomes the worst.

P.S.: Honest conflict is more wholesome - and, to those who care, more holy - than lying peace. God himself links peace to justice - peace has been sown only where there's a harvest of righteousness, whereas the mere absence of outward conflict is everywhere secured and sustained by injustice.

And if you find yourself leaning on your own understanding with some poor-souled probability computation of whether virtue will be fertile or futile, know, Anon, that the prime purpose of evil is soulbuilding - the wicked prosper so that the righteous flourish. This has become counterintuitive solely because we refuse to fight, that is, because we do not hate evil as confidently - or rather competently - as we ought.

It is the-good-fight, the fight itself is good.

- 平和同人 𝙃𝙀𝙄-𝙒𝘼 𝘿ō𝙟𝙞𝙣, 𝙄𝙉𝙋.
συνέτριψα δὲ μύλας ἀδίκων·
ἐκ μέσου τῶν ὀδόντων αὐτῶν
ἅρπαγμα ἐξήρπασα. ≠ 𝖌𝖆𝖛𝖓𝖙𝖑𝖊𝖙

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

Ultimately, "wokeness" is eugenic; the ideology reproduces, its holders do not. Always prioritize what you are for over what you are against. If you must, focus on enemies that get stronger, not those who disappear on their own. In fact, discipline yourself to see the latter not as enemies at all, but, whenever appropriate, as lost brethren (for example, underpinning the unbecoming gender wars on the right is an insufficient understanding of how the women in question do not rebel but comply with rebellion; and how they will always fall in line - any line - but of course only if a line - any line - is formed (by men.)) It lies in the nature of our cause that, while our strategy must be elitist, our sympathy must be populist.

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

For all intents and purposes, there are two types of foreign flesh enemy aliens under conditions of mass migration:

- Those to whom, because they want to be liked, merely being loved feels worse than being hated. Because, while having no reason to be proud yet being the most prideful, they can not endure being pitied; because it exposed both the former defect and the latter excess.

- Those who, when we heap hot coals on their heads, do not even notice they've been burned. Because, being incapable of self-reflection and effectively lacking moral faculty, essentially possessing conscience only in a sort of zoological sense, they naturally will not even feel spoken to.

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

One can not insult whites, one can only hurt them; which is how those who are easily insulted, indeed insulted by their own face in the mirror, take revenge. Our (human) dignity is truth, our (personal) honor is virtue. We care about 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 we are precisely to the extend that we are engaged in becoming 𝘸𝘩𝘰 we are. Those with ears, let them hear.

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

"Human rights"©™ do not apply to germans; and, by proxy, to whites. That's the humility with which our magnanimity is being met; that's what you get for affording human rights to everyone else while assigning human duties only to yourself (a pathological disposition epitomized in the german soul, which is most - and only, it seems - thymotically confident precisely when it is most syneidetically competent, and vice versa.) Put less scandalously than plain truth: "liBerAL fRaMewORks LaCk rEcIpROciTy"...or whatever.

Insofar as we are sustaining unilateral humanity toward those who do not - and largely can not - reciprocate it, for better or for worse, the better man must also be the stronger one, whether we will or no; because, by nature and by grace, the value of our love lies in the fact that we treat humanely even those who do not act humanly, i.e. that we do not conflate charity and sympathy. Of course one can not 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 muslims, or indians, or negros - one can only love them. Alas, to those who want to be liked, merely being loved is worse than being hated.

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

@MT_Neumann Es zu sagen würde, gemäß der eigenen Einordnung, heißen, die betreffenden (vielen) Deutschen böse zu nennen, es nicht zu sagen heißt indessen unweigerlich, sie dumm zu nennen; beides ziemlich dreist aus dem Mund eines Türken.

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

@TRobinsonNewEra @RupertLowe10 The sikhs you love so much are not assimilated by any definition of the word.

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

Die Dezentralität der Organisation der germanischen Stämme war nicht das, woran Rom gescheitert ist. Es war nicht ein mal irgendein Aspekt ihrer Organisation - es waren diese Stämme selbst. Aber wer in dieser (Janichs) Weise nur von Organisationsformen und nicht von der organisierten Substanz reden will, der wird den Deutschen beliebig lassen und vermutlich nicht mal seine Organisation als deutsch ansehen.

[ɢʌᴠпᴛʟᴇᴛ ᴏғ ɢʀᴏʌпıпɢ​​ ☩ ᴡʜıᴛᴇ ʙʌᴛᴏп, ıпᴘ. @gavntlet]

Zehn Gebote für die Kriegsführung des deutschen Soldaten:

1. 𝘋𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘶𝘵𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘢𝘵 𝘬ä𝘮𝘱𝘧𝘵 𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘧ü𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘚𝘪𝘦𝘨 𝘴𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘝𝘰𝘭𝘬𝘦𝘴. 𝘎𝘳𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘬𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘻𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘡𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵ö𝘳𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘳 𝘶𝘯𝘸ü𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘨.

2. 𝘋𝘦𝘳 𝘒ä𝘮𝘱𝘧𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘶ß 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘦𝘳𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘪𝘵 𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘮 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘧ü𝘩𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘯, 𝘸𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵𝘣𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘈𝘣𝘻𝘦𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘦𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘪𝘯. 𝘒ä𝘮𝘱𝘧𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘡𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭𝘬𝘭𝘦𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘩𝘯𝘦 𝘦𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴 𝘈𝘣𝘻𝘦𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘯.

3. 𝘌𝘴 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘧 𝘬𝘦𝘪𝘯 𝘎𝘦𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘳 𝘨𝘦𝘵ö𝘵𝘦𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘯, 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘪𝘣𝘵, 𝘢𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘩ä𝘳𝘭𝘦𝘳 𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘱𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘋𝘪𝘦𝘣𝘦 𝘦𝘳𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘩𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘵𝘦 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘦 ��𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘥𝘪𝘦 𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵𝘦.

4. 𝘒𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘨𝘴𝘨𝘦𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦 𝘥ü𝘳𝘧𝘦𝘯 𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵 𝘮𝘪ß𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘵 𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘪𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘯. 𝘞𝘢𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘯, 𝘗𝘭ä𝘯𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘈𝘶𝘧𝘻𝘦𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘣𝘻𝘶𝘯𝘦𝘩𝘮𝘦𝘯. 𝘝𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘳 𝘏𝘢𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘧 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘯.

5. 𝘋𝘶𝘮-𝘋𝘶𝘮-𝘎𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘯. 𝘎𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘥ü𝘳𝘧𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘮𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘦𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘯.
6. 𝘋𝘢𝘴 𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦 𝘒𝘳𝘦𝘶���� 𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘻𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘩. 𝘝𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘎𝘦𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘻𝘶 𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘯. 𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵ä𝘵𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘍𝘦𝘭𝘥𝘨𝘦𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘥ü𝘳𝘧𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘳 ä𝘳𝘻𝘵𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘻𝘸. 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘛ä𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘬𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘯.

7. 𝘋𝘪𝘦 𝘡𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭𝘣𝘦𝘷ö𝘭𝘬𝘦𝘳𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘻𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘩. 𝘋𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘧 𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵 𝘱𝘭ü𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘶𝘵𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘨 𝘻𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵ö𝘳𝘦𝘯. 𝘎����𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘋𝘦𝘯𝘬𝘮ä𝘭𝘦𝘳 𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘎𝘦𝘣ä𝘶𝘥𝘦, 𝘥𝘪𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘮 𝘎𝘰𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘵, 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘒𝘶𝘯𝘴𝘵, 𝘞𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘧𝘵 𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘞𝘰𝘩𝘭𝘵ä𝘵𝘪𝘨𝘬𝘦𝘪𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘯, 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 ��𝘶 𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘯. 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘋𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘷𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘉𝘦𝘷ö𝘭𝘬𝘦𝘳𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘥ü𝘳𝘧𝘦𝘯 𝘯𝘶𝘳 𝘢𝘶𝘧 𝘉𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘩𝘭 𝘷𝘰𝘯 𝘝𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘻𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘨𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘌𝘯𝘵𝘴𝘤𝘩ä𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘩𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘯.

8. 𝘕𝘦𝘶𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘎𝘦𝘣𝘪𝘦𝘵 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘧 𝘸𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘉𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳 Ü𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘤𝘩 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘉𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘦ß𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘪𝘦 𝘒𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘨𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘣𝘦𝘻𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘯.

9. 𝘎𝘦𝘳ä𝘵 𝘦𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘶𝘵𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘰��𝘥𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘎𝘦𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘧𝘵, 𝘴𝘰 𝘮𝘶ß 𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘶𝘧 𝘉𝘦𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘯 𝘕𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘋𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘣𝘦𝘯. 𝘜𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘬𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘜𝘮𝘴𝘵ä𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘧 𝘦𝘳 ü𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘡𝘶𝘨𝘦𝘩ö𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘬𝘦𝘪𝘵 𝘻𝘶 𝘴𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘮 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘪𝘭 𝘶𝘯𝘥 ü𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵ä𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘦, 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘝𝘦𝘳𝘩ä𝘭𝘵𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘶𝘧 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘶𝘵𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯. 𝘞𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘝𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘤𝘩 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘤��� 𝘋𝘳𝘰𝘩𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘧 𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘥𝘢𝘻𝘶 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘯.

10. 𝘡𝘶𝘸𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘨𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘥𝘪𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘩𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘉𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘩𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘋𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘴𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘣𝘢𝘳. 𝘝𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵öß𝘦 𝘥𝘦�� 𝘍𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘨𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘥𝘪𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳 1-8 𝘢𝘶𝘧𝘨𝘦𝘧ü𝘩𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘎𝘳𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘴ä𝘵𝘻𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘻𝘶 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘥𝘦𝘯. 𝘝𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘴𝘮𝘢ß𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘭𝘯 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘶𝘳 𝘢𝘶𝘧 𝘉𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘩𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘩ö𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘧ü𝘩𝘳𝘶𝘯𝘨 𝘻𝘶𝘭ä𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘨.

Es ist eine lustige Aufgabe, selbst für die gefälligsten und selbstgefälligsten Christen unter uns, zu versuchen, sich einen tugendhafteren militärischen Verhaltenskodex auszudenken, der nicht durch überspitzen Idealismus seine Funktion verfehlt.