Tigre Negro

Modelo 1980, metalero de corazón, videojugador vieja escuela, necio, ácido, ateo y apartidista... En general, como cualquier güey viendo como matar el tiempo!

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@erichovind

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@Tsar_Martyr My claim is that I don’t believe in any god… oh! Look!!! I defended my claim!!!

I’m pretty sure that your parents are ashamed of you.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@darwintojesus False equivalency fallacy from you, as always David.
Most religious people (any religion) can practice their religion and still believe in science. Only blind fanatics and extremists (as you) are the ones that deny facts (evolution).

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@c_h_e_m @Sosleepy8999 @luckydogtwit88 @JennMGreenberg Would you like that the assassin of Charlie Kirk was released the next day?
Paying his bail to release him it’s literally the intention, therefore “freeing him because he did something good”, in C.K. eyes, the “why” is an extra for him.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@c_h_e_m @Sosleepy8999 @luckydogtwit88 @JennMGreenberg It literally says that specific words… and yes, in that same sense.
You know why? Because he disintegrated needed to be bailed out to ask him questions, the intention was just to bail him out.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@mguajardoal @ChumelTorres Su técnica era ir a debatir a universitarios sin preparación y editar videos para que parezca que siempre ganó dichas discusiones… excepto cuando fue a Oxford, ya que ellos publicaron el video completo donde le pusieron su arrastrada.
Era un “con-artist”.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@guy_that_C @BenYousef_E The first thing he did was clapping… so yes, he celebrated she got raped by her father.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@TheHistoryGuy07 “No, no, no, no! You don’t understand it!!! My holy book doesn’t mean what it explicitly says!!!”
You, with your tweet.

By the way, how dangerous are the sucklings in the battlefield? Form 0 to 10? A 7? The sheep are tanks because they are fluffy?

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@wendelltalks As thousand times told Wendell, because atheism doesn’t accounts for any of those things.
Atheism only has to do with one question: “do you believe in any god?” And the answer is “no”.
Please, stop being deliberately ignorant, because this is literally your choice.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@MartinusLogicus As always, playing semantic games.
I would call it an equivocation fallacy, but we know that you are just doing it because you are dishonest, Martinus.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@ChristiansSTDT It’s not banned in 52 countries, that is a complete lie.
It’s banned in 15, but those include countries like North Korea and Turkmenistan, where every religious book is banned.
Those “52 countries” includes Mexico, where 89% of the population is Christian, soooo…

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@MartinusLogicus Again, no. They are “juridic persons” as “legal entity capable of having rights and duties” and not “an individual human being”. You are literally applying a semantic game applying on purpose the wrong definition.
As always, being dishonest, Martinus.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@VideoArtGame Thanks no thanks, I hate it.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@MartinusLogicus And you became another dishonest meme apologist creator, damn, you dug that hole too fast.

Now I really know that you are just another dishonest grifter.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@illustriousone5 @NB247886 @wendelltalks Wrong, you cherry picked the definition.
Literally says “not believing in god or gods, OR the belief that no god or gods exist”.
Again, no fallacy of incredulity.

Please, next time, don’t use dishonest arguments and accept when you get corrected.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@illustriousone5 @NB247886 @wendelltalks Funny, you are just saying the part that is good for your discourse. Suppressing evidence or just cherry picking? Or maybe both? Still, it’s a dishonest move.
Do you like the Cambridge definition? Or prefer another one?

Basic semantics is hard for theist, I know.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@illustriousone5 @NB247886 @wendelltalks Damn, you are bad at this kid…

Saying “i don’t believe you” is not a fallacy, is just the affirmation that… guess what, I don’t believe you!
It’s not an argument. Atheism has nothing to explain.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@illustriousone5 @wendelltalks I think that you don’t know what a “fallacy” means…

Atheism doesn’t make an argument, it is just a position about one question: “do you believe in any god” answer “no”.
No fallacy in it.

If a theist makes an argument about their god, the burden of proof is on them.