Tigre Negro

Modelo 1980, metalero de corazón, videojugador vieja escuela, necio, ácido, ateo y apartidista... En general, como cualquier güey viendo como matar el tiempo!

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@guy_that_C @BenYousef_E The first thing he did was clapping… so yes, he celebrated she got raped by her father.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@TheHistoryGuy07 “No, no, no, no! You don’t understand it!!! My holy book doesn’t mean what it explicitly says!!!”
You, with your tweet.

By the way, how dangerous are the sucklings in the battlefield? Form 0 to 10? A 7? The sheep are tanks because they are fluffy?

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@wendelltalks As thousand times told Wendell, because atheism doesn’t accounts for any of those things.
Atheism only has to do with one question: “do you believe in any god?” And the answer is “no”.
Please, stop being deliberately ignorant, because this is literally your choice.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@MartinusLogicus As always, playing semantic games.
I would call it an equivocation fallacy, but we know that you are just doing it because you are dishonest, Martinus.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@ChristiansSTDT It’s not banned in 52 countries, that is a complete lie.
It’s banned in 15, but those include countries like North Korea and Turkmenistan, where every religious book is banned.
Those “52 countries” includes Mexico, where 89% of the population is Christian, soooo…

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@MartinusLogicus Again, no. They are “juridic persons” as “legal entity capable of having rights and duties” and not “an individual human being”. You are literally applying a semantic game applying on purpose the wrong definition.
As always, being dishonest, Martinus.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@VideoArtGame Thanks no thanks, I hate it.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@MartinusLogicus And you became another dishonest meme apologist creator, damn, you dug that hole too fast.

Now I really know that you are just another dishonest grifter.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@illustriousone5 @NB247886 @wendelltalks Wrong, you cherry picked the definition.
Literally says “not believing in god or gods, OR the belief that no god or gods exist”.
Again, no fallacy of incredulity.

Please, next time, don’t use dishonest arguments and accept when you get corrected.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@illustriousone5 @NB247886 @wendelltalks Funny, you are just saying the part that is good for your discourse. Suppressing evidence or just cherry picking? Or maybe both? Still, it’s a dishonest move.
Do you like the Cambridge definition? Or prefer another one?

Basic semantics is hard for theist, I know.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@illustriousone5 @NB247886 @wendelltalks Damn, you are bad at this kid…

Saying “i don’t believe you” is not a fallacy, is just the affirmation that… guess what, I don’t believe you!
It’s not an argument. Atheism has nothing to explain.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@illustriousone5 @wendelltalks I think that you don’t know what a “fallacy” means…

Atheism doesn’t make an argument, it is just a position about one question: “do you believe in any god” answer “no”.
No fallacy in it.

If a theist makes an argument about their god, the burden of proof is on them.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@TheHistoryGuy07 False dichotomy fallacy.
It’s not “Christianity or atheism”. It’s all versions of god/gods and the absence of them.
Oh, and the burden of proof is on the ones making the positive assertion.

So, yea, all religions unless proven are mere myths.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@evilsteveve Yes, I have a single argument that defeats every one of the infinite iterations of a god definitions that humans can possibly conceive…
I don’t believe you.
That’s the only thing that need to be an atheist: not believing in any god.
Agnosticism is just “you don’t know”.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@imnotbatmanhehe @MartinusLogicus @AntosteIIa You haven’t demonstrated that I’m wrong.

I’m not making presumptions, I’m stating facts.

Is there any argument over there or are we done in here?

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@imnotbatmanhehe @MartinusLogicus @AntosteIIa Is the same debate, not another.
A zygote/fetus is a human in development, not a human being. It doesn’t suppress the bodily autonomy of the pregnant person.

Demonstrate the existence of a soul.

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@imnotbatmanhehe @MartinusLogicus @AntosteIIa *hypocrite

Not a sentient life. And it doesn’t override the pregnant person bodily autonomy.

You are just a hypocrite who wants to transform pregnant persons in mere incubators 🤷‍♂️

[Tigre Negro @GBlackTiger]

@imnotbatmanhehe @MartinusLogicus @AntosteIIa You know that you can still take precautions and get pregnant, right?
You know that females can get raped and get pregnant, right?

And it’s not a human being, it’s a zygote.

Keep living in your bubble.