Independent researcher bridging the gap between geometric logic & AI auditing. Author of the TGM framework. Building the industrial voltmeter for the AI era. 📊
Stable Objects in an Expanding Universe: how an ‘awareness field’ can keep reality rigid while every underlying point never stops moving. https://t.co/9tesEJ6PJC
@PBDsPodcast This comment is a lazy, self-defeating gotcha that confuses "they do it" with sound policy. It's the geopolitical equivalent of "Mom, all the cool dictators are doing it."
The flaw in Thomas' reasoning is that it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance.
@marklevinshow First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates. The sky isn’t falling.
The flaw in Thomas' reasoning is that it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance.
And flawed. Thomas' reasoning is that birthright conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance.
@MegynKellyShow First-generation babies are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates.
The flaw in Thomas' reasoning is that it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance. Fwiw: First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates.
@KariLake@OANN@DanNewsManBall Fwiw: First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates.
@TrustDML Fwiw: First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates.
@SenRandPaul Fwiw: First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates.
The basis for Dershowitz's reasoning is flawed--it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His argument relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. Fwiw, first-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates.
The flaw in Justice Thomas' reasoning is that it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance. Fwiw: First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates.
The flaw in Justice Thomas' reasoning is that it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance. Fwiw: First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates.
The flaw in Justice Thomas' reasoning is that it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance.
Fwiw: First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates.
The flaw in Justice Thomas' reasoning is that it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance.
Fwiw: First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates.
The flaw in Justice Thomas' reasoning is that it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance.
@RedWavePress First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates. But exaggeration, not fact, is the requirement for MAGA membership.
@Geiger_Capital First-generation immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than native-born U.S. citizens. First-generation immigrant youth specifically show the most sizable decrease in offending rates. You shouldn't be trusted to manage anyone's money other than your own.
The flaw in Trump's reasoning is that it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance.
The flaw in Justice Thomas' reasoning is that it conflates citizenship with loyalty. A person’s hatred of the United States, or even future criminal intent, may create a national-security problem, but it does not answer the constitutional question of whether that person was born subject to U.S. jurisdiction. His hypothetical relies on an extreme fear case to attack a general legal rule. That is not strictly an equivocation, though it does blur the meaning of “jurisdiction” by sliding from legal authority to political allegiance.