Excited to share this analysis of @ElemBio’s data (and their new Cloudbreak chemistry). We see accuracy advantages in Element data, especially at 20x-30x coverages and in homopolymers and repeats. Longer sequening inserts can further improve recall through hard genome regions.
@GenomixKid@GenomeInABottle A comprehensive comparison study, in collaboration with Google, will be published on bioRxiv in mid-July. Here is a preview figure comparing AVITI with NovaSeq data. HG003 was selected as it's excluded from DeepVariant training. #Genomics#NGS#AVITI”
@mason_lab@PacBio@GenomeInABottle Great to see some data on the Onso platform!! Looking forward to seeing how it looks beyond a single end read and hopefully release of the data. It's an impressive start for sure!
@GenomixKid@illumina@UltimaGenomics@MGI_Technology The NovaSeqX is a $1000/day instrument (5 year life, reasonable guess at service). Genomes at 100Gb based on $2/Gb or is it 125Gb/genome based on spec page listing 128 genomes per run? Surprising inconsistency for Illumina.
@coregenomics @manal_mehta @JoshWarburton2@OmicsOmicsBlog@SanDiegOmics@JuliaKarow @MGI_BGI @illumina Sequencing costs are like cell phone plans and hotels. They rarely include everything. Ultimately don't think anyone will be disappointed as long as the cost details have transparency. @MGI_BGI aimed for that at AGBT.