@BillyBigtime69@Jake03377640938@GhostGamingG That doesn’t make it right, and supporting these systems will just cause publishers to become even more predatory. This is why boosters count down in real time, $20 skins exist, and everything preys on FOMO.
@BattlefieldComm Doubling down on anti-consumer decisions. The ability to play against bots is an accessibility feature. You enable menu narration by default, but don’t allow basic progress in any PvE mode? You need a new community manager.
@HDTX4@101WolfStar101@BF_Portal_Hub Yes it does. If people want to farm XP, that’s fine. They grossly underestimated demand, and need to remove the cap. It isn’t like free players exist and can create servers, everyone paid full price for this game.
@BF_Portal_Hub The server cap is arbitrary. They could raise it same day, but are cheating out on it and blaming the community. It’s cloud, they only pay for what is actually used, and can instantly increase the cap.
@HopeOfTheRealm That’s awesome! Can we exponentially increase the arbitrary server cap so that it meets demand? Every single player attempting to host has paid for the full game, yet we can’t host private matches due to the low cap.
@Rex_Smashington They need to increase the cap on Portal servers. It’s cloud hosted, so the scalability is built in, just remove the freaking cap so every player has the option to host. Their cap obviously does not meet demand.
@BattlefieldComm Raise the cap. If this many people are actively using live instances, then you need this many live instances. It’s evident that empty persistent servers are actually spun down, and that all of this is cloud hosted, so just increase the cap to meet demand.
@bradynelson100@creation247 They’re a bunch of anti-American assholes. There is no such thing as Christian Nationalist patriot, you’re either a Christian Nationalist, or you’re a patriot. Can’t be both.