Nelson.R.Bilobran

Moro em minha própria casa, e nada imitei de ninguém. E ainda ri de todo mestre, que não riu de si também.
Nietzsche

[IMPERATOR @IMPERATORAUS]

Does a civilisation have a right to exist?

The answer is no.

A civilisation exists only so long as it has the power, the virtue, and the will to exist.

This is the hard realism of history, the principle Thucydides captured in his History of the Peloponnesian Wars when he wrote that "the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must".

Every civilisation – Eastern or Western – was forged by war, tempered by religion, and stabilised by law. Yet none of the people who lived in those empires imagined that their world could vanish within a single lifetime, since decline always arrives more swiftly than those living through it can comprehend.

The paradox is that we study the past yet remain blind to the present.

Every civilisation believes it is the exception – until it isn't.

Civilisations do not die because they are conquered, they die because they surrender. Strength fades first in memory, then in custom, and finally in the character of a people.

When a people abandon the moral and religious foundations that formed them, when institutions decay, when borders dissolve, when wealth replaces virtue, and when comfort dulls duty, decline follows with astonishing speed – not as a sudden catastrophe, but as the final stage of a long defeat.

The West's achievements are extraordinary, but past greatness guarantees nothing.

Our ancestors built something remarkable, but they cannot save us.

We must save ourselves.

Cities can be remade, but once your civilisation is gone, it's gone forever.

[Денис Казанський @den_kazansky]

Российский военный Даниил Туленков, откровенно написал о том, как его командир пытал гражданских в Бердянске. Людей насиловали при их детях.

Это не украинская пропаганда, не ИПСО. Это пишет реальный российский участник «СВО», который уже успел стать писателем и написать книгу “Шторм Z” про свой опыт на войне.

Фильм «Груз 200», который многие считали какой-то адской чернухой - на самом деле просто детский мультик, в сравнении с тем, что в реальности творят российские выродки.

Все это никогда нельзя забывать. Каждое такое признание очень важно запоминать и документировать. Чтобы никто потом не сказал, что этого не было.

[Aristotle 🏛️ @Aristotle7777]

Women used to be 30 years old married with 3 children and a husband living in a house they owned, with a high enough standard of living that she didn’t even need to work and could stay home.

Now 30 year old women have slept with 30 guys, have no children, are not married, live in an apartment and have to go to work full time just to survive.

This isn’t progress, this is societal decline and a dramatically lower quality of life being sold to women as their liberation when in reality it is their enslavement.

[Ruslan Volkov @RuslanVolkov25]

Я в одном согласен с российскими патриотами:
Россию действительно очень трудно победить.
Только не потому, что там передовая страна, сильные институты, доблестное гражданское общество и великая государственная машина.
А по другой причине.
Очень трудно погрузить во тьму то, что уже давно живёт во тьме.
Трудно напугать бедностью людей, которые привыкли к бедности.
Трудно напугать бесправием людей, которые давно живут без прав.
Трудно напугать закрытием границ тех, кто никогда не был свободен.
Трудно напугать цензурой тех, кто давно живёт внутри телевизора.
Трудно напугать произволом тех, кто считает произвол нормой.
Трудно напугать государственным насилием тех, кто всю жизнь называл насилие порядком.
В этом и трагедия.
Россия устойчива не как здоровый организм.
А как организм, который привык жить с болезнью и уже не отличает болезнь от нормы.
Её трудно “победить” ухудшением жизни, потому что для миллионов ухудшение жизни - это и есть привычная форма существования.
Но это не сила.
Это не величие.
Это не цивилизационная стойкость.
Это просто способность долго жить ненормально.
И задача будущей России - не доказать миру, что её невозможно победить.

А впервые построить страну, которую вообще не нужно будет побеждать.
Потому что она перестанет быть угрозой для других и тюрьмой для своих.

[MAXIMUS BROADCAST @MAXALEXHARDY]

С ранних лет я слышал сказки советской, а потом и российской пропаганды:
1. Наше ПВО — лучшее в мире.
2. Наши ракеты и танки не имеют аналогов.
3. Наши военные самолёты — самые самолётистые самолёты в галактике.
4. Наши корабли — кораблястей, чем у всех стран бесконечно загнивающего запада.
Но только глядя на отечественные машины, я почему-то во всём этом сомневался.
Если Жигуль — ведро, то почему ракета должна быть не ведром?
ЧТО Я ВИЖУ В ИТОГЕ:
1. Российское ПВО может попасть только по огромному гражданскому Боингу
(и то вроде бы случайно) или по собственному резервуару с топливом в Капотне.
2. Российские "высокоточные" ракеты попадают не только не в тот объект по которому их запускали, но даже не в ту страну!
(Спросите об этом у жителей Воронежа).
Наши танки опережают западную технику только тем, что башня у них отлетает выше, нежели поделки Роскосмоса.
3. Российская военная авиация — это примерно такая же поебень, как и российский автопром, только со звёздочками.
4. Наши русские военные корабли идут нахуй ровной кильватерной колонной.
Сука, ебаное государство, в котором меня угораздило родиться — это даже не бензоконка.
Точнее, бензоколонка без бензина.
Мы нихуя не можем.
Но главное, что далеко не все из нас это понимают!
Чем вы гордитесь, уроды?
Чем?
У вас, сука, даже самый хуевый в мире президент — и тот подделка.
Ебало, как калейдоскоп — сколько раз не посмотришь, столько раз оно разное.
Короче, такие вот наблюдения.

МАКСИМУС

[Humble Flow @HumbleFlow]

This is what forgetting Christianity does to a civilization:

“The modern world imagines that it has outgrown religion. It has done nothing of the kind. It has merely forgotten it. And because it has forgotten it, it no longer understands itself.

Men do not realize that the whole framework of their moral judgments, their political habits, and even their intellectual methods were formed within a Christian society and cannot exist long outside it. When that framework breaks, they will not find themselves enlightened, but bewildered; not free, but enslaved; not rational, but confused.”

— Hilaire Belloc, Europe and the Faith

[José Mario @JoseMarioMX]

En la Roma de hace más de 2,500 años, la ley no protegía a todos. Los patricios prometían tierras y derechos a la plebe para que peleara sus guerras, pero cuando terminaban las batallas, las promesas se desvanecían. Hasta que un día ocurrió algo extraordinario: la plebe abandonó la ciudad y se negó a seguir sosteniendo un sistema que sólo exigía sacrificios, pero nunca cumplía su palabra.

Su exigencia fue tan sencilla como revolucionaria: “Ya no queremos promesas. Queremos que los derechos queden escritos.” De esa rebelión nacieron los tribunos de la plebe, las XII Tablas y una idea destinada a cambiar la historia: el poder también debía someterse a reglas públicas, conocidas y permanentes. El Estado de derecho no nació cuando los poderosos decidieron ser justos; nació cuando los ciudadanos lograron poner límites al poder.

Cada vez que un gobierno pretende sustituir la ley por su voluntad, cada vez que un funcionario cree que su palabra vale más que la norma escrita, volvemos a la Roma anterior a las XII Tablas. El Estado de derecho existe para recordar una lección que costó siglos de lucha: la libertad nunca descansa en la buena fe de quien gobierna, sino en la fuerza de una ley que obliga por igual a gobernantes y gobernados.

[Australischer Austauschstudent @VceOfReason]

Man hat man vor einer neuen Eiszeit gewarnt.
Es ist nichts passiert.

Man hat vor dem Untergang der Malediven gewarnt.
Sie wachsen.

Man hat vor saurem Regen gewarnt, der die Meere abtöten wird.
Es ist nichts passiert.

Man hat vor einem Klima-Doomsday und dem Point of no Return gewarnt.
Es ist nichts passiert.

Man hat vor einer eisfreien Antarktis gewarnt.
Der Eisschild wächst jedes Jahr um 68 Gigatonnen.

Man hat vor erschöpften Ölquellen gewarnt.
Die Förderung läuft besser als je zuvor.

Man hat vor dem Weltuntergang im Jahr 2000/2005/2010/2015/2020/2025 gewarnt.
Ich sitze hier und tippe diesen Text.

Keine Prognose der Klimavoodoo-Wissenschaft hat sich jemals als wahr herausgestellt.
Aber jede einzelne hat zu höheren Steuern geführt.

Merkwürdig.

[VAN MUTOKA @vanmutoka1]

Sigmund Freud pensait qu’un père devait être une « menace », et non un ami, sinon le fils ne devient jamais pleinement un homme.
Un garçon naît dans le monde de la mère : chaleur, pardon, sécurité. Mais la maturité ne commence que lorsque le père introduit les limites, la hiérarchie et la résistance.
Freud appelait cela la « Loi du Père » — non pas la violence, mais une autorité qui ne s’effondre pas sous l’émotion.
Lorsqu’un père devient trop tôt un copain, le garçon ne quitte jamais vraiment l’enfance. Historiquement, l’initiation impliquait la séparation d’avec la mère, la peur, la discipline, parfois même la douleur. Le père était le guide vers le danger, la responsabilité et la compétition.
Aujourd’hui, ce rôle est dilué dans le réconfort et une empathie sans fin. Le résultat est visible partout : des hommes adultes attachés au confort, terrifiés par la critique, évitant le risque, cherchant l’approbation.
L’amitié avec le père est possible — mais seulement après que la force a été éprouvée, pas avant. Jusque-là, la fermeté n’est pas de la cruauté. C’est une préparation. Le monde, lui, ne négocie pas. Le père existait pour s’assurer que son fils puisse survivre à cette réalité.

[Ted Davis @Snolleygoster]

@DanBurmawy From 1979. Proof of your excellent post

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

The Left and Islam, these two ideologies should be at war, one claims to fight for feminism, LGBTQ rights, secularism, and equality, while the other is rooted in medieval theocracy, submission, and absolute control.

Yet, they’ve formed a perfect symbiotic relationship, using each other for power, influence, and the destruction of Western civilization from within.

For the left, Islam is a weapon.

It is the ultimate tool to dismantle Western values, weaken national identity, and push their own radical agenda.

They don’t care about Islam itself, they exploit it, knowing that the ideology carries a powerful victim narrative that they can weaponize against their political enemies.

The left thrives on oppression narratives.

Islam, with its deep-rooted sense of historical grievance, fits perfectly into the intersectional hierarchy of the “oppressed.”

The left despises Christianity because it upholds traditional morality. But they need a battering ram to dismantle it.

Islam, with its aggressive opposition to Christianity, becomes a convenient ally.

The left knows that Western-educated, patriotic voters won’t buy into their radical agenda.

So they import millions of people from Islamic countries who are more likely to vote for big government, hate Western traditions, and demand “tolerance” while refusing to assimilate.

The more chaos, the better, because a broken society is easier to control.

The left thrives on censorship.

What better way to shut down debate than by labeling any criticism of Islam as “hate speech”?

The left uses Islam as a shield, calling any factual discussion about jihad, sharia, or terrorism “racist.”

But Islam is not a passive tool, it is using the left just as much, if not more.

While the left believes it is controlling Islam, Islam is infiltrating and manipulating the left to expand its dominance.

Islamic jihadists understand that they don’t need a military conquest to take over the West, they just need to infiltrate.

With leftist backing, they gain positions in politics, media, academia, and law enforcement, where they can quietly reshape policy in their favor.

The left’s obsession with open borders and unrestricted immigration is Islam’s golden ticket.

Once a Muslim population reaches a critical mass, it doesn’t assimilate, it dominates.

London, Paris, and Sweden’s no-go zones are the results of Islam using democracy to establish enclaves where sharia law reigns supreme.

Islamic jihadists have learned to disguise their theocratic ambitions under the language of human rights.

They attach themselves to LGBTQ movements, feminist causes, and racial justice protests, even though Islam itself stands against everything these groups claim to support.

It’s a calculated move, gain leftist support, then turn against them when power is secured.

The left believes it can control Islam.

But history shows that every time Islam allies with a non-Islamic force, it ultimately turns against its so-called allies.

The communists in Iran learned this the hard way when they helped overthrow the Shah in 1979, only to be executed en masse by the same Islamic jihadists they had supported.

The same fate awaits the left.

Radical feminists think they’re empowering women, until they’re forced into hijabs.

LGBTQ activists think they’re fighting for equality, until they’re thrown off rooftops.

Socialists think they’re creating utopia, until they find themselves living under the Caliphate.

Islam is not here to be anyone’s pawn. It is here to conquer. And the left, in its blind hatred of the West, is paving the way for its own destruction.

[Enior @EniorJimenez]

Los celtas, francos, sajones, suevos, godos, vikingos, eslavos, germanos, lituanos, letones, etc. ... en fin, los grupos étnicos europeos precristianos adoraban a los anímales, árboles y manantiales, se veían en brutales conflictos interétnicos constantes, practicaban la esclavitud de sus vecinos (esclavitud de blancos) y ofrecían sacrificios humanos a sus falsas deidades.

No tenían códices (es decir, libros; eran principalmente culturas orales con una alfabetización muy limitada), hospitales, universidades ni orfanatos. Eran polígamos, las mujeres tenían pocos o ningún derecho, y los padres podían abandonar (matar) a los hijos no deseados por puro capricho.

No existía la igualdad ante la ley.
No existían los derechos humanos inalienables.
La fuerza bruta y la codicia determinaban quién explotaba y quién era esclavizado.

Pero luego Cristo y Su Iglesia vino a occidente, y tomando lo mejor de Jerusalén, Atenas y Roma, civilizó a paganos, gente tan violenta como los indios mesoamericanos.

Lo que hizo grande a España, lo que hizo grande a Alemania, lo que hizo grande a Francia, lo que hizo grande a Inglaterra, Holanda y al resto de Europa, no fueron paganos meramente blancos, fueron Cristianos.

Esa es la fuente y el fundamento de su grandeza, no solo de Europa, sino de toda la Civilización Occidental.

No se trata de un elemento racial, es mucho más profundo que eso, es espiritual: aquellos pueblos y naciones que verdaderamente abracen al Cristo Crucificado y como nación son cristianizadas, serán iluminadas, saldrán de las sombras y prosperarán en todas sus dimensiones: espiritual, económica, científica, política, etc.

Occidente no construyó el Cristianismo, fue el Cristianismo que construyó a Occidente. Y si lo olvida, se convertirá en lo que era antes de que Cristo lo iluminará: un vil y brutal pagano.

Sin Cristo no hay Europa ni las Américas.

[Jarl Finland @jalle51]

You honestly have to stand up and give a slow clap for the absolute strategic genius of Vladimir Putin. He launched a three-day war to completely "demilitarize" Ukraine and turn it into a defenseless buffer zone. 1,600 days later, he has accidentally created the most lethal, high-tech military superpower in modern European history right on his own doorstep.. 🇷🇺🤡🇺🇦

A massive new briefing from the atlantic council confirms what military analysts have been watching unfold by mid-2026: Putin’s master plan has backfired in the most spectacular way imaginable. Back in 2014, the Ukrainian military was an underfunded ghost town. Today? They have treated the battlefield like a brutal tech start-up. By ditching old-school bureaucracy and empowering young, creative commanders with domestic tech companies, Ukraine has built a drone arsenal so advanced it is literally making NATO generals blush during joint exercises. 🚀💻

Ukraine is now an undisputed drone superpower. They have single-handedly neutralized Russia's Black Sea Fleet using homemade naval drones, and are currently executing a complete "logistics lockdown" on the ryska armén using massive mid-range drone swarms. If Putin accepts peace now, he has to live next door to a permanently hostile, hyper-militarized powerhouse. If he keeps fighting, Ukraine just keeps upgrading its sci-fi arsenal while Russian troops are still begging for diesel for their 1980s tanks. This is the Kremlin’s ultimate geopolitical nightmare unfolding in 4K. Grab your popcorn, the coping is reaching terminal velocity! 😂🍿

Source: Strategic defense analysis by the Atlantic Council on Ukraine's military evolution (June 24, 2026).

[Hugo Freitas @hugofreitas_r]

No Brasil, os tribunais são revolucionários e o partido comunista trotskista defende o respeito às leis.

O jornal do PCO criticou duramente a ação conjunta do MPT e da Justiça do Trabalho que equivaleu, na prática, ao Estado aplicar uma multa a uma empresa privada por não cumprir uma cota de mulheres na gerência que não é prevista em lei.

Art. 5º, II, da Constituição: "ninguém será obrigado a fazer ou deixar de fazer alguma coisa senão em virtude de lei"

O jornal do PCO criticou o desrespeito ao princípio da legalidade, a intervenção indevida do Estado sobre o funcionamento interno de uma empresa (e é um partido comunista que está dizendo!) e o desrespeito às regras legais de ônus da prova, com o Judiciário essencialmente presumindo que a empresa era culpada de discriminação até que ela provasse o contrário (o TST afirmou que empresa não apresentou "explicação objetiva plausível" para a composição da equipe).

[Florence Bergeaud-Blackler 🎓 @FBBlackler]

En ce moment, les américains sont très curieux de savoir comment les européens se laissent islamiser. Plusieurs reporters franchissent l'Atlantique.
Ils découvrent ce que les européens refusent de voir : que cela leur plaise ou non, les musulmans - et pas seulement la frange islamiste - pensent que l'adoptation de la norme et de la culture islamique globale (ou islamisation) n'est qu'une question de temps. L'islamisme est devenu hégémonique en Europe.

[Eve Keneinan 𝛗☦️ن @EveKeneinan]

My dude, stop.

It isn't "2 billion Muslims" that is being blamed.

It is ISLAM.

Islam itself. It is a creed. It believes things and teaches things.

And many of these things are evil.

If a self-described Christian launches into a campaign of mass murder, claiming he is following the teachings of Christianity, people can and will say "That's not loving one's neighbor. That's not in line with the teachings of Christ."

But when a Communist launches into a campaign of mass murder, claiming he is following the teachings of Marx, people will just nod and say "Yes, that's right. Marx does want to murder the bourgeoisie in a bloody revolution. That is what he teaches."

And when a Muslim goes on a campaign of mass murder, claiming he is following the teachings of Islam, people rightly also say "Yes, that's right. Muhammed does actually command killing the kaffir in blood jihad. That is what he teaches."

What the rest of the world sees is

• Muslims who do the evil stuff, which is entirely consistent with their faith (the ones you call "extremists")

• Muslims who don't do it themselves but support it (which appears to be the vast majority of the 2 billion Muslims)

• Muslims who don't like the evil stuff in Islam, but appear to simply be hypocritical Muslims who in fact reject any parts of Islam they don't like

That is, almost everyone in the world agrees that what "the extreme Islamists" are doing is genuine Islam, whether they are for it or against it.

I think it is very much real Islam, which is why Islam needs to be kept out of any countries which it hasn't already invaded and rooted out of any it has but hasn't devoured.

Muslims who want to disavow the worst parts of Islam, like you apparently, are still a danger because they BRING IN ISLAM.

And Islam leads to all the bad stuff you disavow.

They fact that you are a Muslim and ALSO disavow the worst parts of Islam is a property of YOU, not a property of ISLAM.

Just as there are professing Communists who wouldn't hurt a fly. If such personally harmless Communists nevertheless spread Communism, before long hundreds of millions of flies do get hurt.

So even your sanitized version of Islam is a danger.

And all that assumes you are honest about your own beliefs — which one wishes in charity to assume, but since one tenet of Islam is the moral goodness of lying about Islam to further the cause of Islam, one cannot even be sure you aren't running a stealthy justification for the kind of Islam you denounce, working to spread Islam by falsely convincing as many people as you can that any bad Islamic things "wasn't real Islam."

When a Communist tells us that the horrors of Communism "wasn't real Communism", we aren't inclined to think he is being particularly honest.

[Christian Emergency Alliance @ChristianEmerg1]

Brazil: For the first time ever, a Brazilian husband and wife were sentenced to prison for the “crime” of homeschooling their daughters.

The judge held that the children needed more diversity, gender and sex education.

Keep in mind, the mother holds degrees in mathematics and pedagogy and the children perform well.

The sentence is suspended, pending appeal.

Pray for this precious family.

[Matheus Leandro Ferreira @matheuslf]

Dicas de um especialista em finanças para "ter paz financeira":

Dica 1: pega o seu salário e multiplica por 6, essa é a sua primeira meta de investimento para você montar a sua reserva de emergência.

Dica 2: pega o seu salário e divide por 2, esse deve ser o valor máximo ideal para os seus gastos fixos, como aluguel, condomínio, água, luz e outros gastos essenciais.

Dica 3: pega o seu salário e multiplica por 0.3, esse dinheiro é seu, para o seu lazer, para você usar como você quiser durante o mês.

Dica 4: pega o seu salário e multiplica por 120, esse é o valor que você precisa ter investido para receber o equivalente ao seu salário todos os meses sem precisar trabalhar para viver de renda.

Dica 5: pega o salário multiplica por 0.2, esse é o valor que você precisa investir todos os meses para conseguir chegar na meta número 4.

[Sérgio Camargo @CamargoDireita]

A Grã-Bretanha acorda e trata muçulmanos como uma praga a ser vencida. Não está errada. Ontem, em Birmingham, pediu que muçulmanos façam o caminho de volta para a idade das pedras, de onde saíram. Especialmente ilegais, criminosos e estupradores. Força, patriotas, salvem sua civilização da barbárie!

[Desiree Rugani @desireerugani]

Elon Musk acabou de provar que a propriedade na América é uma ficção legal.

Musk: “Você é tributado pelo que ganha, tributado pelo que compra e tributado pelo que possui.”

Pense no que o imposto predial realmente significa.

Você trabalhou por décadas. Pagou tudo integralmente. A escritura está em seu nome.

Pare de pagar à governo sua taxa anual. Veja-os tomarem e venderem para alguém que pagará.

Você nunca possuiu aquela casa. Você estava apenas alugando de uma entidade com a qual nunca assinou um contrato.

O imposto de renda conta a mesma verdade em uma embalagem mais suave.

O governo não toma uma porção dos seus ganhos. Eles decidem quanto do seu próprio trabalho você tem permissão para manter.

Isso não é semântica. É uma confissão de quem o sistema acredita que seu tempo pertence primeiro.

O imposto sobre vendas enterra-se no recibo. Duas pessoas trocam valor voluntariamente. Um terceiro que não contribuiu nada leva uma fatia simplesmente por permitir que isso aconteça.

Agora empilhe todos os três.

Tributado quando você cria. Tributado quando você gasta. Tributado quando você segura. Tributado novamente quando você morre e tenta passá-lo para seus filhos.

Em nenhum ponto desse ciclo o sistema reconhece sua produção como sua.

Porque o dinheiro não é uma abstração. É a vida humana cristalizada.

Todo dólar tributado é uma hora que você já viveu, já sangrou por ela, já se foi.

O Estado não está gerenciando uma economia. Está reivindicando domínio sobre o tempo que você nunca recuperará.

E gastando em sistemas que você nunca pediu e ativamente se opõe.

A instituição que extrai tudo isso não enfrenta nenhuma obrigação de desempenho. Um contratado que não entrega nada é demitido. Uma burocracia que queima trilhões recebe um aumento de orçamento no próximo ano fiscal.

A SpaceX paga impostos às agências que obstruem seus lançamentos. A Tesla financia os reguladores que redigem regras para proteger seus concorrentes.

Os construtores não estão subsidiando o governo. Eles estão financiando seu próprio atrito.

O código tributário tem 74 mil páginas. Não porque a economia exija isso. Porque a extração teve que ser enterrada em complexidade suficiente para que você parasse de perguntar para quem ele foi desenhado para proteger.

O passado pertencia às pessoas que tributavam o mundo.

O futuro pertence às pessoas que o constroem.